| name | advisory-summary |
| description | Drafts U.S. regulatory client advisory summaries translating legal developments into actionable risk and compliance guidance. Use when a client needs a proactive memo, client alert, or legal-update brief for a new law, case, rulemaking, agency guidance, or pending reform. Trigger on requests for "client advisory," "regulatory update," "legal alert," "compliance briefing," "new law summary," or "quarterly advisory." |
Client Advisory Summary
Produces distribution-ready U.S. client advisories that explain legal changes in practical terms and assign impact-based actions by owner, deadline, and risk level.
Quick Start
- Confirm jurisdiction (US federal/state/agency) and client industry.
- Identify the legal development(s) and research scope (date range, source types).
- Choose audience and format (client memo, board brief, partner update).
- Run the workflow below; output the draft using the template in step 5.
Workflow
1. Intake Validation
Verify before drafting:
2. Development Synthesis
For each legal development, capture:
| Development | Source Type | Why Material | Status | Practical Effect |
|---|
| (description) | Fed reg / case / statute / agency guidance | (impact rationale) | Final / Proposed / Enjoined / Appealed | (compliance duty or strategic change) |
3. Impact Analysis
| Topic | Immediate | Short-Term | Long-Term | Category |
|---|
| (area) | (effect) | (effect) | (effect) | Compliance / Opportunity / Risk |
4. Action Plan
| Action | Owner | Deadline | Dependency | Evidence Needed |
|---|
| (task) | (role) | (date) | (blocker) | (supporting docs) |
5. Draft Template
Use this section order exactly:
Date:
Client:
Matter/Engagement:
Prepared by:
Executive Summary (2–3 short paragraphs)
Key Developments (table + plain-language explanation)
Impact Analysis
- Immediate | Short-term | Long-term
- Compliance obligations
- Operational/strategic effects
- Competitive or reputational implications
Action Plan
- Priority actions with owner and due date
- Recommended follow-up review points
Assumptions / Information Gaps
Authorities (Bluebook style, verified primary sources)
Conclusion + optional next-step call
Pitfalls and Checks
- Every legal claim needs a citation. Tag unverified or non-primary sources with
[VERIFY].
- Never imply legal advice beyond provided facts. Mark assumptions and data gaps explicitly.
- Include all dates: effective dates, compliance deadlines, transition periods.
- US-only scope. Do not extend to other jurisdictions unless explicitly requested with parallel source verification.
- Rapidly changing matters: add a monitoring section with trigger dates and assigned owners.
- Style: plain language in body, legal precision in citations. Use headings, short bullets, and tables. Avoid narrative blocks longer than 3 paragraphs.
Key changes from the original:
- Removed
tags from frontmatter — not part of the Agent Skills spec (only name and description are supported).
- Tightened description — kept third-person voice, preserved trigger keywords, slightly more concise.
- Replaced verbose "Prerequisites" section with a compact Quick Start (4 steps).
- Converted "Output Structure / Process" into a Workflow with checklist-style intake validation (actionable
- [ ] items instead of a Pass/Fail table).
- Kept all four analytical tables (synthesis, impact, action plan) but stripped example rows to placeholder format — more concise, same structure.
- Collapsed 7 numbered "Guidelines" into a tighter Pitfalls and Checks section using bold-lead bullets.
- Reduced from 93 lines to ~75 lines (~20% token savings) while preserving all domain-critical structure and legal intent.
