Skip to main content

requirements-manager

Manage space engineering requirements in a human-readable, trackable format. Use this skill whenever the user wants to define, update, trace, or review system requirements, component specifications, verification criteria, mass/power budgets as requirements, or perform traceability audits. Trigger for "requirement," "specification," "shall statement," "traceability," or "requirements review."

Source facts

Repository
LunCoSim/space-engineering-skills
Last source activity
March 2, 2026 at 11:53
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
11
Forks
2

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

File Explorer
3 files

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
requirements-manager
description
Manage space engineering requirements in a human-readable, trackable format. Use this skill whenever the user wants to define, update, trace, or review system requirements, component specifications, verification criteria, mass/power budgets as requirements, or perform traceability audits. Trigger for "requirement," "specification," "shall statement," "traceability," or "requirements review."
# Requirements Management Skill > Read `CONVENTIONS.md` at the repo root before proceeding. This skill defines how to manage engineering requirements. It is the foundation skill — every other skill checks requirements before doing analysis. ## Before You Begin Ask the user (if not already known): 1. What requirements standard/format do they follow? - INCOSE Guide for Writing Requirements - ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148 - NASA NPR 7123.1 - ECSS-E-ST-10-06 - Or project-specific — this skill's Markdown format is always acceptable 2. Where should requirements be stored? Default: `/requirements/` at project root. 3. Is there an existing requirements database to import from? (DOORS, Jama, Polarion) ## Applicable Phases - **Primary**: All phases — requirements are a living document from Phase A through operations. - **Critical gates**: SRR (System Requirements Review), PDR, CDR. ## Core Philosophy Requirements change frequently. They should be easy to read, easy to diff in git, and easy to parse by scripts if needed. We use **Markdown** with structured blocks. ## The Requirements Format ### Structure of a Requirement Block ```markdown ### [REQ-PWR-001] Minimum Battery Capacity **Status**: DRAFT | APPROVED | VERIFIED **Parent**: [REQ-SYS-050] **Verification Method**: Test | Analysis | Inspection | Demonstration The spacecraft shall have a minimum usable battery capacity of 1500 Wh at end-of-life (EOL) to support eclipse operations. **Rationale**: Based on worst-case eclipse duration of 35 minutes and average power draw of 2 kW, with 20% margin. ``` ### File Organization Store requirements by subsystem in `/requirements/`: - `requirements/system_level.md` — Top-level mission and system requirements - `requirements/power_system.md` — EPS requirements - `requirements/thermal.md` — Thermal requirements - etc. ### ID Convention `REQ-[SUBSYSTEM]-[NUMBER]` — e.g., `REQ-PWR-001`, `REQ-STR-003`, `REQ-SYS-100`. ## Workflows ### 1. Creating Requirements - Ask for the subsystem and goal. - Generate new requirement blocks with unique IDs. - Ensure every requirement has a clear, testable "shall" statement and a rationale. ### 2. Updating Requirements - Use search to find the relevant requirement ID. - Update text and rationale. - Add a `**History**:` note summarizing the change. ### 3. Traceability Audit - Scan the requirements directory. - Build a Parent → Child tree. - Flag orphan requirements (no parent, unless top-level system). - Flag requirements with no verification method. ### 4. Requirements Flowdown When a domain skill (e.g., `thermal-assessment`) derives a requirement from analysis: - Create the requirement in the appropriate file. - Trace it to the parent system requirement. - Set verification method based on how it will be confirmed. ## Writing Style - Use "shall" for requirements, "will" for facts/declarations, "should" for goals. - Avoid "soft" words: ~approximately, sufficient, robust, flexible~. - Every requirement must be testable — if you can't verify it, rewrite it. - Be concise. ## Interface - **Reads from**: User input, existing requirements files - **Writes to**: `/requirements/` - **Consumed by**: All other skills (as their starting point), `v-and-v-manager` (for verification closure)
View on GitHub