with one click
consensus
多视角共识决策 - 使用 Codex 主线与只读 child agent 获取架构、实现和风险视角并综合决策。
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Menu
多视角共识决策 - 使用 Codex 主线与只读 child agent 获取架构、实现和风险视角并综合决策。
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
AI-native code annotation protocol that encodes intent, risk, dependencies, constraints, and test expectations in machine-parseable comments.
Professional Codex-native multi-agent code review with confidence scoring
架构规划专家 - 使用 Codex 本地上下文、仓库证据和只读 child agent 进行大型系统架构设计与规划。
Backend architecture patterns, API design, database optimization, and server-side best practices for Node.js, Express, and Next.js API routes.
Imported from everything-codex command checkpoint
Universal coding standards, best practices, and patterns for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and Node.js development.
| name | consensus |
| description | 多视角共识决策 - 使用 Codex 主线与只读 child agent 获取架构、实现和风险视角并综合决策。 |
| auto_invoke | true |
| tags | ["consensus","decision","codex-native","multi-agent"] |
| version | 0.2.0 |
| source | fork |
| checksum | 8f5a3a75601e12c985ba02ce5a487e6b8afa846cd47eb1e2667cdec962bc3e5a |
| updated_at | "2026-05-29T03:50:00.000Z" |
| layer | research |
针对技术选型、架构决策、方案取舍和高风险变更,使用 Codex 主线协调多个只读 child agent 形成共识。不调用外部模型 CLI。
手动触发:
使用 consensus 分析:<决策问题>
收集:
推荐三个视角:
spawn_agent(agent_type="explorer", message="<architecture/context perspective>")
spawn_agent(agent_type="reviewer", message="<risk/correctness perspective>")
spawn_agent(agent_type="docs-researcher", message="<docs/facts verification perspective>")
wait_agent
close_agent
如 agent 不可用,在当前回复内用 [ARCHITECTURE]、[REVIEW]、[FACTS] 三块自演。
每个视角必须输出:
Codex 主线对比观点:
## Consensus Decision
### Decision
[决策问题]
### Perspectives
| Perspective | Position | Key Reasons | Risks | Confidence |
### Agreements
- [共同结论]
### Disagreements
- [分歧 + 原因]
### Recommendation
[最终建议]
### Verification Plan
1. [step] -> verify: [check]
### When To Revisit
[触发重新决策的条件]