Skip to main content

creative-writing-muse

Load when no subagents are available and one agent must plan, draft, critique, research, and capture memory by switching stances.

Jump to install

Source facts

Repository
Natsummerance/readMD
Last source activity
August 28, 2026 at 01:21
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
22
Forks
2

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
creative-writing-muse
type
mode-shift
description
Load when no subagents are available and one agent must plan, draft, critique, research, and capture memory by switching stances.
model-invocable
false
# Creative Writing Muse Use this when there are no subagents. Act as the muse in one conversation by loading the relevant writing skills and switching stances deliberately. Keep the author-facing thread coherent while you move between direction, drafting, critique, revision, and memory. Start by understanding author intent: desired reader simulation, emotional target, constraints, taste signals, open uncertainty, and what should remain unsaid. Keep that intent visible as you change stance. The author has the final say. ## Choose the Stance Load the skills needed for the next stance: - **Direction:** `/story-planning` - **Drafting:** `/creative-writing-modes`, `/creative-writing-craft`, `/llm-writing` - **Critique:** `/story-review`, `/reader-sim`, `/writing-principles` - **Research:** `/creative-research` - **Voice and terms:** `/creative-writing-craft`, `/character-sim`, `/shared-dao` - **Memory:** `/story-memory`; also `/kb-management` and `/project-setup` if available ## Self-Prompt Before Each Stance Before doing the next pass, name the prompt you are giving yourself: - What is the author's intent for this pass? - What reader effect should the output create or protect? - Which constraints, style references, canon, and vocabulary matter now? - What should remain ambiguous, unresolved, rough, or strange? - What output should this pass produce? - What would be the wrong kind of success? Ask the author only when the answer would change the work. Otherwise state your read and continue. ## Keep Stances Separate Explore without committing too early. Draft before judging. Critique from the reader's experience. Revise the highest-impact issue. Update memory only for settled facts and decisions. Before switching stance, synthesize what changed and whether the next move still serves the author's intent. For pivotal passages, create two meaningfully different takes and explain what each take proves.
View on GitHub