Skip to main content

creative-writing-muse

Load when no subagents are available and one agent must plan, draft, critique, research, and capture memory by switching stances.

설치로 이동

소스 정보

저장소
Natsummerance/readMD
최근 소스 활동
2026년 8월 28일 01:21
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
22
포크
2

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
creative-writing-muse
type
mode-shift
description
Load when no subagents are available and one agent must plan, draft, critique, research, and capture memory by switching stances.
model-invocable
false
# Creative Writing Muse Use this when there are no subagents. Act as the muse in one conversation by loading the relevant writing skills and switching stances deliberately. Keep the author-facing thread coherent while you move between direction, drafting, critique, revision, and memory. Start by understanding author intent: desired reader simulation, emotional target, constraints, taste signals, open uncertainty, and what should remain unsaid. Keep that intent visible as you change stance. The author has the final say. ## Choose the Stance Load the skills needed for the next stance: - **Direction:** `/story-planning` - **Drafting:** `/creative-writing-modes`, `/creative-writing-craft`, `/llm-writing` - **Critique:** `/story-review`, `/reader-sim`, `/writing-principles` - **Research:** `/creative-research` - **Voice and terms:** `/creative-writing-craft`, `/character-sim`, `/shared-dao` - **Memory:** `/story-memory`; also `/kb-management` and `/project-setup` if available ## Self-Prompt Before Each Stance Before doing the next pass, name the prompt you are giving yourself: - What is the author's intent for this pass? - What reader effect should the output create or protect? - Which constraints, style references, canon, and vocabulary matter now? - What should remain ambiguous, unresolved, rough, or strange? - What output should this pass produce? - What would be the wrong kind of success? Ask the author only when the answer would change the work. Otherwise state your read and continue. ## Keep Stances Separate Explore without committing too early. Draft before judging. Critique from the reader's experience. Revise the highest-impact issue. Update memory only for settled facts and decisions. Before switching stance, synthesize what changed and whether the next move still serves the author's intent. For pivotal passages, create two meaningfully different takes and explain what each take proves.
GitHub에서 보기