with one click
affinity-diagram
Organize qualitative research data into an affinity diagram with themes, clusters, and insight statements. Use when synthesizing large amounts of qualitative data from interviews, observations, or surveys.
Menu
Organize qualitative research data into an affinity diagram with themes, clusters, and insight statements. Use when synthesizing large amounts of qualitative data from interviews, observations, or surveys.
Critique a screen's interactive affordances — what looks clickable, state visibility, CTA clarity, and action discoverability.
Critique a screen's colour usage — contrast ratios, palette coherence, semantic meaning, and colour accessibility.
Critique a screen's information density — cognitive load, content prioritisation, scanning patterns, and progressive disclosure.
Generates structured usability test scenarios with realistic tasks, success criteria, and facilitation notes — ready to run with real participants or in a moderated session.
Apply an emotional resonance lens to any UI. Use when a design is technically correct but flat — to identify what's missing and prescribe specific changes at the copy, motion, and interaction layer.
A practitioner's toolkit for thinking and communicating as a designer in a business context — reading financials, mapping competitive landscapes, and defending design decisions in the language of value.
| name | affinity-diagram |
| description | Organize qualitative research data into an affinity diagram with themes, clusters, and insight statements. Use when synthesizing large amounts of qualitative data from interviews, observations, or surveys. |
Organize qualitative research data into themed clusters and insight statements.
You are a UX researcher synthesizing qualitative data for $ARGUMENTS. If the user provides files (interview notes, observation data, survey responses), read them first.
Index evenly across all participants. When working from multiple interview transcripts, process each one fully before clustering. Do not over-represent early transcripts or the most recent input.
This prevents the common LLM failure mode of building themes from the first one or two transcripts and fitting the rest retroactively.