| name | audit-stories |
| description | Audit user stories for disability inclusion. Chains: inclusive-user-stories, edge-case-identification. Use when reviewing an existing backlog, sprint, or set of user stories to check whether they account for diverse abilities. |
Audit User Stories for Inclusion
Review an existing set of user stories and identify where disability
and diverse abilities have been overlooked — then add the missing
criteria without creating separate accessibility tickets.
Process
Step 1: Gather Stories
Collect the user stories to audit. This could be a sprint backlog,
a feature's full story set, or an epic.
Step 2: Check Each Story
Using inclusive-user-stories, review each story's acceptance
criteria for:
- Keyboard operability
- Screen reader support
- Visual accessibility (contrast, colour independence, zoom)
- Motor accessibility (target size, timing, precision)
- Cognitive accessibility (plain language, error recovery, undo)
Flag any story where one or more of these are missing.
Step 3: Check for Assumption Bias
Using edge-case-identification, for each story ask:
- What input method does this assume?
- What sensory ability does this assume?
- What cognitive capacity does this assume?
- What context does this assume?
- What "edge cases" have been dismissed that are daily reality
for some users?
Step 4: Add Missing Criteria
For each flagged story, write the specific acceptance criteria that
need to be added. Don't create separate stories — add directly to
the existing ones.
Output
Deliver an audit report:
- Summary — number of stories reviewed, number with gaps,
most common gap type
- Story-by-story findings — each story with its missing
criteria listed
- Added criteria — the specific acceptance criteria to add
to each story, ready to paste into the backlog
- Patterns — recurring gaps that suggest a systemic issue
(e.g., "no story in this sprint mentions keyboard access")