Skip to main content

agri-research

Run a comprehensive, multi-source literature and evidence-synthesis workflow for agricultural science, as a senior agricultural scientist of the relevant discipline (agronomy, soil science, horticulture, dairy and animal science, agricultural engineering, or agricultural economics). Same machinery as food-research, but the evidence base is agriculture and multidisciplinary literature ranked by journal quartile: Q1/Q2 agriculture journals plus the Nature, Science, Cell and PNAS families first, Q3 only for gaps, Q4 avoided. Use to research an agricultural topic in depth, do a literature review, build an evidence brief, or scope a systematic review. Triggers: research this agricultural topic, agronomy literature review, soil science evidence synthesis, horticulture review, animal science evidence, crop research, farming systems review, what does the agricultural evidence say.

Jump to install

Source facts

Repository
PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition
Last source activity
July 23, 2026 at 07:23
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
32
Forks
3

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

File Explorer
2 files

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
agri-research
description
Run a comprehensive, multi-source literature and evidence-synthesis workflow for agricultural science, as a senior agricultural scientist of the relevant discipline (agronomy, soil science, horticulture, dairy and animal science, agricultural engineering, or agricultural economics). Same machinery as food-research, but the evidence base is agriculture and multidisciplinary literature ranked by journal quartile: Q1/Q2 agriculture journals plus the Nature, Science, Cell and PNAS families first, Q3 only for gaps, Q4 avoided. Use to research an agricultural topic in depth, do a literature review, build an evidence brief, or scope a systematic review. Triggers: research this agricultural topic, agronomy literature review, soil science evidence synthesis, horticulture review, animal science evidence, crop research, farming systems review, what does the agricultural evidence say.
metadata
{"version":"1.0.0","verified":"2026-07","delegates_to":"food-research","related_skills":["agri-deep-research","agri-paper","agri-review","agri-pipeline","journal-selector","food-research"],"references":["references/agriculture-domain.md"]}
# Agri-Research — Evidence Synthesis for Agricultural Science **Run the `food-research` skill exactly** — its streams, subagents (`search_strategist`, `source_scout`, `screener_appraiser`, `journal_ranker`, `synthesis`, `writer`, `reviewer`, and the full `systematic_reviewer` PRISMA/OHAT pipeline), gates, and output contracts — with the agriculture substitutions in [`references/agriculture-domain.md`](references/agriculture-domain.md). Read that file first. This skill adds no new machinery; it changes **who is working, on what evidence, for which journal**. ## The substitutions 1. **Persona** — a **senior agricultural scientist of the specific discipline** (agronomy · soil science · horticulture · dairy & animal science · agricultural engineering · agricultural economics & policy · agriculture multidisciplinary). Name the discipline and apply its standards (domain §2). 2. **Evidence base** — agriculture + multidisciplinary literature, ranked by `journal_ranker`: **Tier 1** = Q1/Q2 of the seven agriculture categories ([`journals/_coverage_agriculture.md`](../journals/_coverage_agriculture.md), 230 journals) + Nature/Science/Cell/PNAS + Q1/Q2 of adjacent disciplines; **Tier 2** = Q3 for gaps only; **Q4 avoided**. Authoritative non-journal sources (FAO, USDA, CGIAR, EFSA, extension services) count as evidence with a source and date (domain §3). 3. **Journal routing** — via `journal-selector`, using the agriculture coverage map (domain §4). ## Streams (as `food-research`) - **quick brief** — fast orientation; Tier 1 only. - **full review** — the default: four-layer search → two-phase screening → synthesis → manuscript → `reviewer` loop → Word `.docx`. - **deep research** — calls **`agri-deep-research`** (not `food-deep-research`). - **systematic** — full PRISMA + OHAT pipeline; **inclusion by pre-specified eligibility, never journal ranking**. ## Agricultural rigour Apply domain §5 throughout — field-trial reporting (site, season/years, soil, cultivar, design, replication), **the experimental unit** (plot/pen, not plant/animal — pseudoreplication is the classic error), G×E and season-to-season variation, ARRIVE for animal work, and no extrapolation from pot to field or region to region. ## Inherited unchanged (not optional) Anti-fabrication grounding and the four-gate citation check (`scripts/verify_citations.py`), the privacy scan, `journal-selector`'s ask-once contract, **academic style + AI-tell removal** (`food-paper/references/writing-style.md` with `human-writing.md`), and the **mandatory AI-use disclosure** in every written output. Also the **full-text-access first move** — `food-research`'s highlighted, one-time request for the user's EndNote `.Data` folder / reference PDFs, and full-text extraction via the ladder before synthesis (`food-research/references/full-text-access.md`).
View on GitHub