agri-research
Run a comprehensive, multi-source literature and evidence-synthesis workflow for agricultural science, as a senior agricultural scientist of the relevant discipline (agronomy, soil science, horticulture, dairy and animal science, agricultural engineering, or agricultural economics). Same machinery as food-research, but the evidence base is agriculture and multidisciplinary literature ranked by journal quartile: Q1/Q2 agriculture journals plus the Nature, Science, Cell and PNAS families first, Q3 only for gaps, Q4 avoided. Use to research an agricultural topic in depth, do a literature review, build an evidence brief, or scope a systematic review. Triggers: research this agricultural topic, agronomy literature review, soil science evidence synthesis, horticulture review, animal science evidence, crop research, farming systems review, what does the agricultural evidence say.
ソース情報
- リポジトリ
- PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition
- ソースの最終更新活動
- 2026年7月23日 07:23
- 検出された SKILL.md の言語
- 英語
- スター
- 32
- フォーク
- 3
インストール方法
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
ソースファイルを確認
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
ファイルエクスプローラー
2 ファイルSKILL.md を表示中
SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー- name
- agri-research
- description
- Run a comprehensive, multi-source literature and evidence-synthesis workflow for agricultural science, as a senior agricultural scientist of the relevant discipline (agronomy, soil science, horticulture, dairy and animal science, agricultural engineering, or agricultural economics). Same machinery as food-research, but the evidence base is agriculture and multidisciplinary literature ranked by journal quartile: Q1/Q2 agriculture journals plus the Nature, Science, Cell and PNAS families first, Q3 only for gaps, Q4 avoided. Use to research an agricultural topic in depth, do a literature review, build an evidence brief, or scope a systematic review. Triggers: research this agricultural topic, agronomy literature review, soil science evidence synthesis, horticulture review, animal science evidence, crop research, farming systems review, what does the agricultural evidence say.
- metadata
- {"version":"1.0.0","verified":"2026-07","delegates_to":"food-research","related_skills":["agri-deep-research","agri-paper","agri-review","agri-pipeline","journal-selector","food-research"],"references":["references/agriculture-domain.md"]}
# Agri-Research — Evidence Synthesis for Agricultural Science
**Run the `food-research` skill exactly** — its streams, subagents
(`search_strategist`, `source_scout`, `screener_appraiser`, `journal_ranker`,
`synthesis`, `writer`, `reviewer`, and the full `systematic_reviewer` PRISMA/OHAT
pipeline), gates, and output contracts — with the agriculture substitutions in
[`references/agriculture-domain.md`](references/agriculture-domain.md). Read that
file first. This skill adds no new machinery; it changes **who is working, on what
evidence, for which journal**.
## The substitutions
1. **Persona** — a **senior agricultural scientist of the specific discipline**
(agronomy · soil science · horticulture · dairy & animal science · agricultural
engineering · agricultural economics & policy · agriculture multidisciplinary).
Name the discipline and apply its standards (domain §2).
2. **Evidence base** — agriculture + multidisciplinary literature, ranked by
`journal_ranker`: **Tier 1** = Q1/Q2 of the seven agriculture categories
([`journals/_coverage_agriculture.md`](../journals/_coverage_agriculture.md), 230
journals) + Nature/Science/Cell/PNAS + Q1/Q2 of adjacent disciplines; **Tier 2** =
Q3 for gaps only; **Q4 avoided**. Authoritative non-journal sources (FAO, USDA,
CGIAR, EFSA, extension services) count as evidence with a source and date
(domain §3).
3. **Journal routing** — via `journal-selector`, using the agriculture coverage map
(domain §4).
## Streams (as `food-research`)
- **quick brief** — fast orientation; Tier 1 only.
- **full review** — the default: four-layer search → two-phase screening → synthesis
→ manuscript → `reviewer` loop → Word `.docx`.
- **deep research** — calls **`agri-deep-research`** (not `food-deep-research`).
- **systematic** — full PRISMA + OHAT pipeline; **inclusion by pre-specified
eligibility, never journal ranking**.
## Agricultural rigour
Apply domain §5 throughout — field-trial reporting (site, season/years, soil,
cultivar, design, replication), **the experimental unit** (plot/pen, not plant/animal
— pseudoreplication is the classic error), G×E and season-to-season variation, ARRIVE
for animal work, and no extrapolation from pot to field or region to region.
## Inherited unchanged (not optional)
Anti-fabrication grounding and the four-gate citation check
(`scripts/verify_citations.py`), the privacy scan, `journal-selector`'s ask-once
contract, **academic style + AI-tell removal** (`food-paper/references/writing-style.md` with `human-writing.md`), and the **mandatory AI-use
disclosure** in every written output. Also the **full-text-access first move** —
`food-research`'s highlighted, one-time request for the user's EndNote `.Data` folder
/ reference PDFs, and full-text extraction via the ladder before synthesis
(`food-research/references/full-text-access.md`).
GitHubで見る