| name | solution-analyzer |
| description | Extract solution details from vendor pages for ecosystem entries |
| user-invocable | true |
| argument-hint | <url> |
Vendor Solution Analyzer
Extract solution details from a vendor page, product doc, or announcement — features, architecture, competitive positioning, and battle card claims.
Usage
/solution-analyzer <url>
Examples
/solution-analyzer https://developer.nvidia.com/isaac-ros
/solution-analyzer https://www.physicalintelligence.company/blog/pi0
Instructions
When this command is invoked:
-
Fetch the page using WebFetch
-
Extract solution details:
- Functional features: What it does — capabilities, supported tasks, modalities
- Non-functional claims: Performance metrics, latency targets, throughput, hardware support, supported platforms, scale targets, certifications — what they highlight in comparisons
- Competitive positioning: Who they compare against (explicitly or implicitly), on which dimensions, what they claim to be better at
- Architecture / integration points: APIs, data formats, protocols, dependencies, deployment model
- Openness and lock-in signals: License, hardware requirements (CUDA-only?), proprietary APIs, data format lock-in
- Pricing model signals: Free/paid/enterprise tiers, compute requirements
-
Identify building blocks: Which building blocks from building-blocks.md does this solution cover?
-
Identify competitive relationships:
- Competes with: Other solutions in same building block(s) — on which dimensions
- Complements: Solutions it integrates with or depends on
-
Produce output using the solution-entry.md template, ready for inclusion in ecosystem.md
-
Archive source: Download a screenshot or PDF of the source page to research/library/screenshots/ if feasible
Style Guide
- Use factual feature comparisons, not marketing language
- Quote specific metrics when vendors provide them
- Note claims that seem inflated or unverified
- Distinguish between announced and shipping features