| name | council-codereview |
| description | Use for code review and quality feedback from both Codex and Gemini. Triggers on "council review code", "council code review", "have council review this", "get council feedback on code". |
Council Code Review Skill
Comprehensive code review with both Codex (GPT-5.2) and Gemini for quality, security, and best practices.
When to Use
- Before committing or creating PRs
- Reviewing new code implementations
- Checking for security vulnerabilities
- Getting quality feedback
- When user asks for code review from the council
Reasoning Level
high (default for code review)
Execution
-
Identify the code to review:
- Specific files mentioned by user
- Staged git changes (
git diff --staged)
- Recent modifications
-
Gather the code content and context
-
Formulate a review prompt:
Review this code for quality, security, and best practices:
File: <filename>
```
Please analyze:
- Potential bugs or logic errors
- Security vulnerabilities
- Performance issues
- Code style and readability
- Suggestions for improvement
-
Run BOTH commands in parallel:
Codex:
codex exec --sandbox read-only -c model_reasoning_effort="high" "<prompt>"
Gemini:
gemini -s -y -o json "<prompt>"
-
Synthesize review findings
Response Format
## AI Council Code Review
### Codex (GPT-5.2) Review:
**Issues Found:**
- [Severity: High/Medium/Low] [Issue description]
**Security Concerns:**
- [Any security issues]
**Suggestions:**
- [Improvement suggestions]
---
### Gemini Review:
**Issues Found:**
- [Severity: High/Medium/Low] [Issue description]
**Security Concerns:**
- [Any security issues]
**Suggestions:**
- [Improvement suggestions]
---
### Council Synthesis:
**Critical Issues (Both Agree):**
- [Issues identified by both - highest priority]
**Additional Concerns:**
- [Issues only one model caught]
**Agreed Best Practices:**
- [Suggestions both models recommend]
**Final Verdict:** [LGTM / Needs Changes / Blocking Issues]
---
*Session IDs: Codex=[id], Gemini=[id]*
