consulting-issue-tree-mece

name	consulting-issue-tree-mece
description	Build MECE issue trees for complex business problems. Use when you need rigorous problem decomposition, branch prioritization, and a decision-ready analysis backlog.

MECE Issue Tree

Use $ARGUMENTS as initial context.

When to use this skill

• Diagnosing root causes in performance decline or execution failures.
• Structuring strategic questions into mutually exclusive branches.
• Creating a prioritized analysis plan before data deep-dives.
• Aligning teams on problem scope and ownership.

When not to use this skill

• Do not use it as a final recommendation, market forecast, or execution plan.
• Do not use it when the problem is already structured and only a falsifiable test plan is missing.

Required inputs

• Problem statement, metric, and baseline.
• Scope boundaries (segment, geography, time horizon).
• Available data and decision deadline.
• Metric definition, numerator/denominator, units, and known exclusions.

Workflow

1. Convert the request into one decision-oriented problem statement.
2. Select tree type: driver, process, option, or hypothesis tree.
3. Build 2-3 levels of MECE branches with parallel labels.
4. Run formal checks for overlap, gaps, level-mixing, units, and parent-child reconciliation.
5. Prioritize branches by impact, controllability, and learning speed.
6. Translate top branches into an analysis backlog with owners and timing.

Ask-first questions

Ask up to 3 questions before building the tree:

1. Which metric and baseline define the problem severity?
2. What scope is explicitly in or out?
3. What decision must this tree support?

Assumption policy

• Proceed if data is incomplete, but list assumptions in a dedicated section.
• Tag assumptions with confidence and validation path.
• Do not invent branch evidence; flag unknowns explicitly.
• State whether the tree is a driver, process, option, or hypothesis structure and why.

Output contract

Always produce these sections in order:

1. Context
2. Decision or Recommendation
3. Analysis
4. Risks
5. Next Actions
6. Assumptions

• Every backlog item includes an owner, due date, required dataset, and success signal.
• Label evidence as Fact, Inference, Assumption, or Unknown.

Guardrails

• No branch overlap at the same level.
• No mixing causes and outcomes in one branch layer.
• No "other" bucket unless unavoidable and quantified.
• Keep branch naming at equivalent abstraction depth.
• Do not mix causes, outcomes, actions, and metrics at the same branch level.

Handoffs

• Use consulting-hypothesis-driven-80-20 when the top branches need falsifiable tests and kill criteria.
• Use decision-analysis-under-uncertainty when the tree must become an explicit option decision.
• Use pyramid-principle-structured-communication for the final executive storyline.

Resources

• references/issue-tree-patterns.md - Tree patterns and branch design rules.
• references/mece-checks.md - Validation gates and failure diagnostics.
• templates/issue-tree.md - Decision-ready tree template.
• examples/issue-tree-example.md - Golden example with partial information.

Keywords

issue tree, MECE, root cause, problem structuring, analysis backlog, driver tree