code-review

Systematic code analysis with evidence collection

Repository: SimHacker/moollm
Last source activity: February 7, 2026 at 14:40
Detected SKILL.md language: English
Stars: 49
Forks: 6

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.

A direct command skips the review prompt. Inspect the source before running it.

npx skills add https://github.com/SimHacker/moollm --skill code-review

The command stays on one line. Scroll horizontally to inspect it before copying.

Prefer a local copy? Download the files currently available to SkillsMP.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

File Explorer

7 files

SKILL.md

Source instructions · Read-only preview

Back to search Back to installation

protocol

Protocol names ARE K-lines.

2026-08-06

mind-mirror

Personality modeling system based on Timothy Leary's 1985 software + The Sims traits

2026-08-06

soul-city

Liminal place prototype — rooms, shops, tools, objects; souls walk here

2026-08-02

View all from this repository

Code Review

"Read with intent. Question with purpose. Document with care."

Systematic code analysis with evidence collection. Code review IS an adventure — the codebase is the dungeon, findings are clues.

Review Process

READ → NOTE ISSUES → CLASSIFY → REPORT

Step 1: Setup

Create REVIEW.yml
Identify files to review
Define focus areas

Step 2: Overview

List all changed files
Read PR/commit description
Note initial impressions

Step 3: Deep Review

For each file:

Read the code
Check against criteria
Note findings
Run relevant checks

Step 4: Verification

Run tests
Run linters
Check regressions

Step 5: Synthesize

Compile findings
Prioritize issues
Generate REVIEW.md
State recommendation

Finding Severity

Level	Symbol	Meaning	Action
Blocking	🚫	Must fix before merge	Request changes
Important	⚠️	Should fix or explain	Request changes
Minor	💡	Nice to fix	Comment only
Praise	🎉	Good work!	Celebrate

Finding Types

Security — Injection, auth, sensitive data
Correctness — Logic errors, edge cases
Performance — N+1 queries, memory leaks
Maintainability — Clarity, DRY, naming
Style — Formatting, conventions

Review Checklist

Security

Input validation
Output encoding
Authentication/authorization
Sensitive data handling
Injection vulnerabilities
Timing attacks

Correctness

Logic errors
Edge cases handled
Null/undefined handling
Error handling
Race conditions
Resource cleanup

Maintainability

Code clarity
Appropriate comments
Consistent naming
DRY (no duplication)
Single responsibility
Testability

Performance

Algorithmic complexity
Memory usage
Database queries
Caching
Unnecessary operations

Core Files

REVIEW.yml

review:
  name: "PR #123: Add user authentication"
  status: "in_progress"
  
findings:
  blocking:
    - id: "B1"
      file: "src/auth/login.ts"
      line: 45
      type: "security"
      summary: "Timing attack vulnerability"
      
  important: []
  minor: []
  praise: []

verification:
  tests: { ran: true, passed: true }
  linter: { ran: true, passed: false, issues: 3 }

REVIEW.md

Formatted document with:

Summary and counts
Issues by severity
Verification results
Recommendation

Verification Commands

tests:
  - "npm test"
  - "pytest"
  - "go test ./..."
  
linters:
  - "npm run lint"
  - "flake8"
  - "golangci-lint run"

Recommendation Output

Outcome	Meaning
`approve`	Good to merge
`request_changes`	Has blocking/important issues
`comment`	Minor feedback only

name	code-review
description	Systematic code analysis with evidence collection
allowed-tools	["read_file","run_terminal_cmd"]
tier	2
protocol	CODE-REVIEW
tags	["moollm","development","quality","review","security"]
related	["adventure","debugging","research-notebook","session-log","rubric","evaluator"]
templates	[{"file":"REVIEW.yml.tmpl","purpose":"Structured review tracking","parameters":["review_name","created_date","focus","files"]},{"file":"REVIEW.md.tmpl","purpose":"Formatted review document","parameters":["review_name","created_date","files"]}]

name	code-review
description	Systematic code analysis with evidence collection
allowed-tools	["read_file","run_terminal_cmd"]
tier	2
protocol	CODE-REVIEW
tags	["moollm","development","quality","review","security"]
related	["adventure","debugging","research-notebook","session-log","rubric","evaluator"]
templates	[{"file":"REVIEW.yml.tmpl","purpose":"Structured review tracking","parameters":["review_name","created_date","focus","files"]},{"file":"REVIEW.md.tmpl","purpose":"Formatted review document","parameters":["review_name","created_date","files"]}]