Audits whether an existing test suite proves important behavior as a sustainable portfolio. Use when test confidence or lifecycle control is uncertain; not to implement tests or review one delivery.
Skills in this repository
TuYv/ccpm - Page 56
SkillsMP has collected 5,252 skills from TuYv/ccpm. Open a skill to review its source and details.
TuYv/ccpmShowing 40 of 5,252 collected skills.
RICE-scores Stories with market research and generates prioritization table. Use when Stories need business priority ranking for sprint planning.
Audits implemented architecture fitness, boundaries, contracts, dependencies, and configuration ownership. Use for system structure; not for current-state documentation, diagrams, or plan review.
Audits queries, transactions, data-path performance, and persistence resource lifecycle. Use when data correctness or scalability is at risk; not for general performance tuning.
Analyzes Story and builds optimal task plan (1-8 tasks), then routes to create or replan. Use when Story needs task breakdown or replanning.
Creates implementation, refactoring, and test tasks from templates. Use when an approved task plan needs tasks created via the configured tracker provider and reflected in kanban.
Compares ideal plan vs existing tasks and applies KEEP/UPDATE/OBSOLETE/CREATE changes. Use when Story tasks need re-sync with updated requirements.
Optimizes a measured latency, throughput, memory, CPU, or I/O problem through profiling and keep-or-discard experiments. Use for a known bottleneck; not unbiased A/B comparison.
Use when validating Stories, plans, or tasks through the evaluation platform with mandatory research, parallel evidence lanes, sequential merge, and bounded refinement. Modes: story | plan_review.
Use when an evaluation run needs mandatory official-doc, MCP Ref, Context7, and current best-practice research with a structured research summary.
Use when an evaluation coordinator needs normalized findings from target artifacts and research evidence.
Use when an evaluation run needs review-driven documentation updates and a structured documentation summary.
Use when accepted findings require bounded repair changes and a structured repair summary.
Use when an evaluation run must merge research, findings, documentation, and repair outputs into one verified result.
Use when an evaluation run requires bounded iterative refinement with trace and cleanup evidence.
Upgrades dependencies across package managers with breaking-change research and rollback-safe verification. Use for dependency maintenance; not general code modernization.
Modernizes a bounded capability by removing obsolete custom mechanisms or reducing bundle and maintenance cost. Use for proven modernization value; not routine upgrades or tuning.
Compares tools or implementations through reproducible A/B workloads, correctness oracles, and controlled measurements. Use to choose alternatives; not to optimize a known bottleneck.
Implements a bounded product-code change through the smallest complete root-cause solution. Use for scoped delivery; not for planning, review, audit, upgrades, modernization, or tuning.
Executes Story tasks in priority order (To Review, To Rework, Todo). Use when Story has planned tasks ready for implementation.
Executes implementation tasks through Todo, In Progress, To Review. Use when task needs coding with KISS/YAGNI. Not for test tasks.
Reviews task implementation for quality, code standards, and test coverage. Use when task is in To Review. Sets task Done or To Rework.
Fixes tasks in To Rework by applying reviewer feedback, then returns to To Review. Use when task was rejected during review.
Executes test tasks (label 'tests') through Todo to To Review with risk-based limits. Use for test task execution. Not for implementation tasks.
Designs risk-based test portfolio decisions and prioritized scenarios without changing code. Use when requirements need a test strategy; not for auditing or implementing tests.
Creates, updates, consolidates, retires, and runs scoped acceptance tests using project-native tooling. Use when executable acceptance evidence must change; not for audits or product fixes.
Story-level quality gate with 4-level verdict (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL/WAIVED) and Quality Score. Use when Story is ready for quality assessment.
Evaluates new product directions using current demand, acquisition, competition, economics, and validation evidence. Use before commitment; not for backlog or implementation planning.
Use when coordinating story quality evaluation with mandatory research, worker summaries, agent review, regression evidence, and bounded refinement.
Checks DRY/KISS/YAGNI/architecture compliance with quantitative Code Quality Score. Use when implementation tasks are Done and need quality scoring.
Auto-fixes low-risk tech debt (unused imports, dead code, commented-out code) with >=90% confidence. Use when audit findings need safe automated cleanup.
Runs existing test suite to catch regressions after implementation changes. Use when Story needs regression verification. No status changes.
Analyzes application logs: classifies errors, checks log quality, maps stack traces to source. Use when logs need review after test runs or during development.
Orchestrates test planning pipeline: research, manual testing, automated test planning. Use when Story needs comprehensive test coverage planning.
Researches real-world problems, competitor solutions, and customer complaints for a feature domain. Use before test planning to ground tests in actual user pain points.
Performs manual testing of Story AC via executable bash scripts in tests/manual/. Use when Story implementation needs hands-on AC verification.
Plans automated tests (E2E/Integration/Unit) using Risk-Based Testing after manual testing. Use when Story needs a test task with prioritized scenarios.
Reviews standalone skills and their configured distribution surfaces before publication. Use for skill release readiness; not for product code or implementation-plan review.
Use when auditing project documentation through the evaluation platform with mandatory research, coordinated audit workers, and structured summaries.
Checks hierarchy, links, SSOT, compression, requirements compliance, freshness, legacy cleanup. Use when auditing documentation structure.