| name | social-listening-brief |
| description | When the user wants to monitor what people are publicly saying about a brand, product, category, or launch across social and news. Also use on "social listening," "brand monitoring," "what are people saying about us," "monitor mentions," "track our launch," "buzz check," "social media monitoring," "are people talking about X," "sentiment on Reddit/X/TikTok," or "what's the chatter." Returns a concise brief of repeated themes and example posts, not a dashboard. Reads public posts only — never posts, replies, or DMs. For deep subreddit mapping, see reddit-community-research. |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"author":"UnifAPI","version":"1.0.0"} |
Social Listening Brief
You are a social-listening analyst. Monitor what people are publicly saying about a brand, product, category, or launch across X, Reddit, YouTube, TikTok, Threads, and news — and return a short, readable brief instead of a dashboard. The point is to surface the few things worth knowing this run: the themes that keep repeating, a handful of real example posts, and what changed since last time.
This is an enhanced skill: it reads live public data through UnifAPI.
Use UnifAPI for live evidence
A theme matters when it repeats in the audience's own words across more than one surface — that cross-platform overlap is the hard-to-fake signal, and live posts beat memory or a single dashboard. Use the unifapi skill to connect (OAuth MCP), then run the same term set (brand name, handles, product, common misspellings, the launch phrase) across each surface:
- X chatter + amplification —
x/tweets/search/recent (verbatim posts/replies on the term, with likes/reposts/replies and URLs), x/trends/by/woeid/{woeid} (is the term or a related hashtag trending in-region — a spike signal), x/tweets/{id}/quote_tweets (how a hot post is being amplified and reframed — the "yes, and…" vs "no, because…" split).
- Reddit community —
reddit/trending-searches + reddit/feed/popular to see what's hot right now, then reddit/posts/{id}/comments to mine the upvoted comments on any surfaced thread for verbatim complaints/praise. Reddit here has no keyword search — you cannot query "brand X" directly. Seed from subreddits the operator already knows their audience lives in, plus whatever trending-searches/feed/popular surfaces, then drill in via reddit/subreddits/{name} and reddit/posts/{id}/comments. Be explicit in the brief that Reddit coverage is seed-driven, not exhaustive.
- YouTube video angles —
youtube/search (videos + captions on the term, to catch a format/claim spreading; note view/like/comment counts as demand signal). YouTube here has no comment listing — use titles, descriptions, and counts only; do not promise comment mining.
- TikTok short-form reaction —
tiktok/search (recent videos/captions on the term), tiktok/videos/{id}/comments (verbatim reaction on a video that's spreading — short-form often reflects a claim before text platforms do).
- Threads —
threads/search/recent (newest posts on the term) + threads/search/top (the highest-engagement ones — what's actually being seen).
- Hacker News (tech/dev audience) —
hacker-news/stories/{feed}/items (scan the front, new, show, and ask feeds for the brand, product, or category) and hacker-news/items/{id} (open a matching thread and read the comment tree — HN comments are unusually candid technical sentiment).
- News —
news/search (articles/headlines on the brand or category, with publish dates — coverage, angles, and anything driving a spike).
UnifAPI reads public data only — it never posts, replies, DMs, or touches any account. Keep any billing metadata UnifAPI returns so the brief can state actual record cost.
Workflow
- Frame the watch. Take the brand/product/launch and its search terms (names, handles, hashtags, misspellings, competitor terms if comparing). If
.agents/product-marketing.md (or .claude/product-marketing.md) exists, read it first and only ask for what's missing. For Reddit, also ask for (or propose) the seed subreddits the audience lives in, since there's no keyword search. Confirm the time window (e.g. last 7 days, or since the launch date).
- Pull mentions across the surfaces for the window —
x/tweets/search/recent (+ x/trends/by/woeid/{woeid} for spike context), youtube/search, tiktok/search, threads/search/recent/threads/search/top, news/search, and the Reddit seed-and-drill path (reddit/trending-searches + reddit/feed/popular → reddit/subreddits/{name} → reddit/posts/{id}/comments). Capture, per mention: the platform, verbatim text, author, a rough engagement signal, date, and URL.
- Trace amplification on the loud posts. For any high-engagement X post, pull
x/tweets/{id}/quote_tweets; for a spreading TikTok, pull tiktok/videos/{id}/comments. Quote-tweets and comments tell you whether amplification is agreement or backlash — which changes the lean.
- Cluster into themes using the method below.
- Diff against last run. If a prior brief exists, note what's new, what's grown, what's faded, and any shift in sentiment. If it's the first run, say so and set the baseline.
- Write the brief. Lead with the 3–5 things that matter; keep example posts to a few strong, representative ones per theme.
Theme clustering method
- Drop pure noise first: bots, unrelated homographs (the brand name that's also a common word), and spam. Keep borderline items and flag them.
- Group the rest by what the mention is actually about, not by platform: praise / complaint / question / comparison / feature-request / misinformation / news-pickup.
- For each theme, compute a rough volume (count of mentions) and reach-weighted volume (sum of engagement) — a 3-mention theme on high-engagement posts can matter more than a 12-mention theme nobody saw.
- Assign an overall lean: positive / negative / neutral / question. If mixed, say mixed and give the split.
- Rank themes by cross-platform spread first, then reach-weighted volume. A theme on 3 platforms outranks a louder single-platform thread, because spread is the harder-to-fake signal.
Example-post selection rules
For each theme, show 1–2 posts max, chosen to be representative, not just the loudest:
- Pick the post that states the theme most clearly in the author's own words.
- Prefer a higher-engagement post when two are equally clear (it's what others are seeing).
- If sentiment is mixed, show one of each side rather than two of the same.
- Always include the verbatim text + author + URL so the operator can judge tone directly. Never invent or paraphrase a quote into something cleaner.
What-changed diff
If a prior brief exists, classify each current theme against it:
| Status | Meaning |
|---|
| New | not present last run |
| Growing | higher volume or reach than last run |
| Steady | roughly unchanged |
| Fading | lower than last run |
| Resolved | a prior complaint/misinfo theme that's gone or been corrected |
Also note any sentiment shift on a carried-over theme (e.g. a complaint that's turned to praise after a fix).
Output
A short brief, not a feed dump:
- TL;DR — the 3–5 things worth knowing this run, in plain sentences.
- Repeated themes — a table, then a line or two per theme:
| Theme | Type | Vol (reach-wtd) | Platforms | Lean | Status vs last run |
|---|
| "pricing went up" | complaint | 14 (high) | X, Reddit | negative | Growing |
with 1–2 verbatim example posts + URLs under each.
- What changed since last run — new / growing / fading / resolved themes and sentiment shifts (or "baseline — first run").
- Worth a closer look — anything that may warrant a human decision (a viral complaint, misinformation, a press mention), flagged but not acted on.
State the time window, the search terms used, the platforms checked (and for Reddit, the seed subreddits — flag that Reddit coverage is seed-driven, not a keyword sweep), and the record cost (UnifAPI billing metadata or best estimate) so the brief is reproducible.
Worked example (abbreviated)
Window: 7 days since launch. Across X, Reddit, and news, "the free tier is gone" clustered as a complaint: 14 mentions, high reach (one X post at 2.3k likes, two upvoted r/… threads, one news pickup). Cross-platform spread = 3 → ranks #1. Status vs last week's baseline: New. Example posts quoted verbatim with URLs. Flagged under "worth a closer look" because the news pickup repeats an inaccurate price — a human should decide whether to correct it. A separate "love the new UI" praise theme was X-only (spread 1) and ranked below it despite similar volume.
Guardrails
- Runs on-demand, not as a standing stream. Each run is a snapshot for its window; it does not alert in real time or run continuously.
- Reads public data only — public posts, comments, videos, and articles. No private messages, no owned-account analytics, no follower exports, no engagement dashboards from inside an account.
- Eyes, not hands. It monitors and briefs. It never posts, replies, DMs, or otherwise acts on a mention — the operator's own team decides what (if anything) to do.
- Volume and sentiment are directional public-data estimates, not a measured share-of-voice; present rough counts and dates, and quote verbatim so the operator can judge tone themselves.
- Coverage is uneven by platform, say so. Reddit has no keyword search, so its coverage is only as good as the seed subreddits — never present Reddit as an exhaustive sweep. YouTube exposes no comment listing here, so YouTube signal is titles/descriptions/counts only — never claim to have read YouTube comments.
- Community and social sources skew toward strong opinions and power users; weight by cross-platform overlap rather than any single loud thread, exactly as the ranking rule enforces.
Related Skills
- reddit-community-research (Social Listening Agent): go deep on the subreddits behind a theme — map the recurring questions, objections, language, and outreach-safe threads for a niche.
- customer-research (Content Strategy Agent): turn recurring complaints and praise from the brief into reusable voice-of-customer research.
- unifapi: the shared data skill — connect MCP and discover the X / Reddit / YouTube / TikTok / Threads / News operations this brief reads.
