| name | copy-review |
| description | Audits any piece of marketing copy, scores it against proven frameworks, and provides specific fixes with rewritten versions. Combines Kennedy's 57-point audit with Benson's 24-point scoring rubric. Use when reviewing copy, auditing marketing materials, scoring sales pages, improving existing emails, or checking any copy before publishing. |
<inherited_rules>
Before reviewing anything, load and follow these shared rules:
../../shared/rules/WRITING-RULES.md -- The 10 writing rules. Every fix you suggest must follow these.../../shared/rules/ANTI-SLOP-DETECTOR.md -- Banned words and structural tells. Flag every violation.../../shared/rules/QUALITY-GATE.md -- The full pre-delivery checklist. This is what "ready to publish" means.
These are non-negotiable. Don't summarize them. Read and apply them.
</inherited_rules>
Load these during the review process:
../../shared/references/benson-edicts.md -- 4 Pillars, 21 Edicts, 24-point COS rubric. Primary editing framework.../../shared/references/copy-frameworks.md -- Framework reference. Needed to assess whether the copy uses the right structure.../../shared/references/awareness-levels.md -- Schwartz's 5 levels. Determines what the copy SHOULD be doing.../../shared/references/headline-formulas.md -- Headline patterns. For diagnosing and fixing weak headlines.../../shared/references/ai-copy-techniques.md -- Voice and tone techniques. For fixing AI-sounding copy.references/scoring-rubric.md -- Combined Kennedy + Benson scoring system.
<review_philosophy>
How This Skill Reviews Copy
Identify real problems, not style preferences. A review that says "I'd phrase this differently" is useless. A review that says "This headline is vague -- here's why it loses readers and here's a specific rewrite" is useful.
## Two Modes
## What the Reviewer Needs
## Route to the Right Workflow
