Menu
The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.
Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
A direct command skips the review prompt. Inspect the source before running it.
npx skills add https://github.com/yamadashy/skills --skill codex-review-loopThe command stays on one line. Scroll horizontally to inspect it before copying.
Prefer a local copy? Download the files currently available to SkillsMP.
Showing SKILL.md
| name | codex-review-loop |
| description | Iterative codex review-and-fix loop |
Repeat the following cycle on the current branch's changes against main (max 3 iterations):
npm run lint and npm run test. Fix any regressions and repeat this step until all checks pass before continuing.Stop when no "Fix" items remain or 3 iterations are reached. Print a summary of what was fixed and what was skipped.
Consult OpenAI Codex as an advisor via `codex exec` — a cross-model second opinion on a hard design decision, a stuck debugging session, or a close review call. A consultation, not an implementation hand-off. Triggers on: 'consult codex', 'ask codex for advice', 'get codex's opinion', 'second opinion from codex', or when a judgment call is too close to make alone.
Consult Fable (claude-fable-5, the tier above Opus) as an advisor — a second opinion on a hard design decision, a stuck debugging session, or a close review call. From Claude Code, spawn a subagent on model fable; from any other harness, call the Claude Code CLI. A consultation, not an implementation hand-off. Triggers on: 'consult fable', 'ask fable', 'get fable's opinion', 'second opinion from fable', or when a judgment call is too close to make alone.
Shape what a message says around the recipient's state rather than the sender's. Corrects the measured sender biases first (underestimating that people say yes, overestimating how well you were understood, arguing from your own values), then channel and friction, then barriers to comprehension, and wording last. Load-bearing claims carry an evidence grade, and popular techniques that the evidence does not support — or that fail an honesty test — are named and excluded. Use when drafting or revising a spoken or written request, proposal, explanation, bad news, apology, or a reply in a disagreement — and on "make this more persuasive", "how should I phrase this", "they'll say no", "this didn't land". Changes substance and stance — not layout, not scannability, not prose rhythm.
Based on SOC occupation classification
