Menú
De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.
Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Un comando directo omite el prompt de revisión. Revisa el origen antes de ejecutarlo.
npx skills add https://github.com/yamadashy/skills --skill codex-review-loopEl comando permanece en una sola línea. Desplázate horizontalmente para revisarlo antes de copiarlo.
¿Prefieres una copia local? Descarga los archivos que SkillsMP tiene disponibles ahora.
Mostrando SKILL.md
Consult OpenAI Codex as an advisor via `codex exec` — a cross-model second opinion on a hard design decision, a stuck debugging session, or a close review call. A consultation, not an implementation hand-off. Triggers on: 'consult codex', 'ask codex for advice', 'get codex's opinion', 'second opinion from codex', or when a judgment call is too close to make alone.
Consult Fable (claude-fable-5, the tier above Opus) as an advisor — a second opinion on a hard design decision, a stuck debugging session, or a close review call. From Claude Code, spawn a subagent on model fable; from any other harness, call the Claude Code CLI. A consultation, not an implementation hand-off. Triggers on: 'consult fable', 'ask fable', 'get fable's opinion', 'second opinion from fable', or when a judgment call is too close to make alone.
Shape what a message says around the recipient's state rather than the sender's. Corrects the measured sender biases first (underestimating that people say yes, overestimating how well you were understood, arguing from your own values), then channel and friction, then barriers to comprehension, and wording last. Load-bearing claims carry an evidence grade, and popular techniques that the evidence does not support — or that fail an honesty test — are named and excluded. Use when drafting or revising a spoken or written request, proposal, explanation, bad news, apology, or a reply in a disagreement — and on "make this more persuasive", "how should I phrase this", "they'll say no", "this didn't land". Changes substance and stance — not layout, not scannability, not prose rhythm.
| name | codex-review-loop |
| description | Iterative codex review-and-fix loop |
Repeat the following cycle on the current branch's changes against main (max 3 iterations):
npm run lint and npm run test. Fix any regressions and repeat this step until all checks pass before continuing.Stop when no "Fix" items remain or 3 iterations are reached. Print a summary of what was fixed and what was skipped.