prioritization-scoring

name	prioritization-scoring
description	Multi-dimensional gap scoring and ranking — define criteria, score, weight, rank, sensitivity-check. Combines multi-criteria-scoring, stakeholder-confirmation, and feasibility assessment.
execution	tactic
dependencies	{"sops":["deep-insight-multi-criteria-scoring","deep-insight-web-research","evidence-synthesis","stakeholder-confirmation"]}

Prioritization Scoring

Multi-dimensional gap scoring and ranking.

Operations

• multi-criteria-scoring — score gaps on multiple dimensions
• stakeholder-confirmation — validate priorities across perspectives
• evidence-grading — assess evidence quality supporting each gap

Available SOPs

Subagent: multi-criteria-scoring, stakeholder-confirmation Shared: evidence-synthesis Import: web-research

Execution Guidance

Define scoring dimensions (importance, feasibility, novelty, urgency, impact). Score each gap 1-10 per dimension. Weight by stakeholder priorities. Rank. Check sensitivity of ranking to weight changes — are top gaps robust to ±20% weight shifts?

Minimum Yield

<HARD-GATE>
- gaps scored: >= 5
- dimensions used: >= 4
- stakeholder perspectives: >= 3
- sensitivity check: performed
</HARD-GATE>

Available SOPs

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

SOP	When to use
deep-insight-multi-criteria-scoring	Score gaps on multiple dimensions (importance, feasibility, novelty, urgency, impact) using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis.
deep-insight-web-research	Deep web research with full page fetching via Apify. Import of web-browsing/web-research skill. Must fetch full page — no conclusions from previews.
evidence-synthesis	Synthesize multi-source evidence into structured argumentation. Weaves findings from literature, web, and analysis into coherent evidence maps with explicit strength ratings.
stakeholder-confirmation	Simulate stakeholder perspectives to validate gap priorities. Assesses gap value from researcher, practitioner, funder, and end-user viewpoints.