| name | society-of-mind |
| description | Strategy: Multi-agent collaborative debate based on Du et al. Society of Mind. Agents share perspectives iteratively until convergence or divergence is detected. |
| type | strategy |
| tactics | ["perspective-rotation"] |
| dependencies | {"tactics":["stress-test-perspective-rotation"],"sops":["confidence-calibration","debate-architect","divergence-detection","perspective-critic"]} |
Society of Mind Strategy
Multiple agents evaluate independently, then share and revise through iterative rounds.
Method
- debate-architect assigns N distinct perspectives to agents
- Each perspective-critic evaluates artifact from assigned viewpoint
- All perspectives shared — agents revise positions given others' arguments
- divergence-detection identifies agreement clusters and persistent disagreements
- Repeat sharing rounds until convergence or saturation
Budget Table
| Parameter | S | M | L |
|---|
| Debate rounds | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| Participating agents | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Coverage dimensions | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| External evidence searches | 2 | 5 | 10 |
Orchestration
debate-architect → [assign perspectives]
→ [parallel]: perspective-critic × N
→ [for each sharing round]:
share all outputs → perspective-critic revises
→ divergence-detection → (converge or continue)
→ debate-transcript-analysis → verdict-synthesis
Subagents
- debate-architect (perspective assignment)
- perspective-critic × N (perspective evaluation)
- divergence-detection (convergence tracking)
- confidence-calibration (termination decision)
Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|
| stress-test-perspective-rotation | Tactic: Sequential perspective evaluation with divergence aggregation. Each agent evaluates from a distinct viewpoint, then disagreements are surfaced and resolved. |
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|
| confidence-calibration | Calibrates confidence scores based on debate progression. Determines whether to escalate, continue, or terminate based on cumulative evidence. |
| debate-architect | Designs debate structure based on artifact type — selects attack vectors, assigns perspectives, determines escalation ladder, and configures round parameters. |
| divergence-detection | Identifies agreement and disagreement patterns across multiple perspective evaluations. Maps consensus clusters and persistent divergence points. |
| perspective-critic | Evaluates artifact from a specific assigned perspective. Produces assessment grounded in that viewpoint's values, priorities, and expertise. |
