yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine - Page 10

constraint-identification

Find blockers and showstoppers using TOC, TRIZ contradiction analysis, and Pre-mortem techniques.

constraint-identification-sop

Identify constraints for a candidate using TOC, TRIZ, and Pre-mortem methods.

constraint-injection

Inject artificial constraints to force creative divergence. Generates and applies constraints (resource, time, material, audience, scale) to existing ideas to produce variants.

constraint-protocol

Inject constraints → force creative response → extract transferable principles. Orchestrates constraint injection, response generation, and principle extraction.

constraint-response

Generate creative solutions under extreme constraints — no "impossible" allowed, find a way.

constraint-tree-building

Build Current Reality Tree from UDEs through causal chains to core conflicts

construct-validity-assessment

Evaluate whether benchmark measures its claimed capability

constructive-rebellion

Build constructive alternatives from destructive negation. Transform violated assumptions into viable innovation directions.

contamination-audit

Detect train-test data leakage and memorization artifacts

contradiction-derivation

Negate a claim, derive logical consequences step by step, detect whether a genuine contradiction or absurdity emerges.

contradiction-detection

Evaluate whether a derivation chain has reached a genuine contradiction, absurdity, or inconclusive state.

contradiction-identification

Identify technical and physical contradictions in a system through functional modeling and matrix analysis.

contradiction-matrix-lookup

Query the 39x39 TRIZ contradiction matrix to find recommended inventive principles for a given technical contradiction.

controlled-perturbation

Systematically vary parameters along defined axes, recording performance at each point to identify degradation thresholds.

convergence-assessment

Compare results across multiple model variants — quantitative agreement metrics and qualitative conclusion stability.

convergence-check

Evaluate whether the ranking has stabilized by analyzing rating history and computing stability metrics.

convergence-distillation

Iterative convergence to a single answer through Classic Delphi, Modified Delphi, or Nominal Group Technique rounds.

core-conflict-extraction

Extract core conflict in Evaporating Cloud format (A-B-C-D-D')

counter-assumption-generation

Generate dialectical opposites for governing variables — coherent alternative worldviews where the opposite is true.

counter-thesis-construction

Construct the strongest possible counter-argument to the convergence decision using Dialectical Inquiry and Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis methods.

counterexample-generation

Systematically generate counterexamples (monsters) to a given claim using diverse heuristic strategies.

counterexample-heuristics

Generate counterexamples (monsters), attempt monster-barring, incorporate surviving counterexamples as lemma refinements (Lakatos method).

counterfactual-reasoning

Tactic for reasoning about what would happen if variables were different — supports causal identification and intervention analysis.

counterfactual-scenario-construction

Construct precise, internally consistent counterfactual scenarios where specified factors are altered, then reason about the resulting conclusion.

courtroom-structured

Strategy: Legal adversarial structure — prosecution presents case, defense responds, evidence is cross-examined, judge delivers verdict. Emphasizes evidence quality and procedural rigor.

coverage-analysis

Systematic coverage evaluation pipeline — benchmark inventory, method-problem crossing, and intersection evaluation to map explored vs unexplored solution space.

coverage-gap-detection

Detect uncovered regions in the solution space, producing a prioritized gap list.

coverage-mapping

Map evaluation coverage, identify untested capability dimensions — 20 benchmarks, 30 papers, 50 web searches

coverage-scoring

Compute coverage completeness, redundancy, and gap severity scores from a coverage map.

creative-ideation

Creative Generation Engine — transforms research hypotheses into diverse solution spaces via 10 parallel creativity campaigns spanning structural, analogical, destructive, and combinatorial methods.

criteria-interrogation

Challenge the evaluation criteria themselves using Assumption-based Planning, Critical Systems Heuristics, and Boundary Critique to ensure the framework is sound.

criterion-definition

Extract evaluation criteria from research goals and candidate alternatives.

critic-attack

Attack an advocate's case with multiple arguments rated by severity.

critic-defender-judge

Strategy: Classic triangular debate — Critic attacks, Defender responds, Judge adjudicates. Based on Irving AI Safety via Debate with Toulmin argumentation structure.

critical-case-design

Flyvbjerg critical case methodology: select most-likely and least-likely cases to maximize inferential power.

critical-chain-identification

Identify the critical chain — longest path considering resource contention

critical-path-calculation

CPM forward/backward pass with float calculation to identify the critical path

critical-path-identification

Identify which input uncertainties contribute most to output uncertainty and compute EVPI for research prioritization.

critical-path-planning

Identify the shortest execution path via CPM forward/backward pass, resource leveling, and buffer insertion

cross-consistency-analysis

CCA: pairwise consistency checking to reduce solution space 90-99%