Orchestrates pairwise consistency evaluation and narrative construction to filter the morphological field
Skills in this repository
yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine - Page 11
SkillsMP has collected 961 skills from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine. Open a skill to review its source and details.
yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engineShowing 40 of 961 collected skills.
Verify gap existence across multiple databases (Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar, arXiv, domain-specific). Distinguishes database-specific gaps from universal gaps.
Synthesize all cross-domain findings into a structured idea report. Integrates outputs from all strategies and SOPs.
Probes defender responses for inconsistencies, logical gaps, and unsupported claims. Acts as follow-up interrogation after initial defense.
Multi-source cross-validation of gap authenticity โ cross-database search, temporal sensitivity testing, false-gap filtering, stakeholder confirmation.
Apply Ulrich's Critical Systems Heuristics 12 questions across 4 dimensions (motivation, control, expertise, legitimacy) comparing is vs ought.
Track evidence accumulation over time โ cumulative meta-analysis protocol design. Budget: 40 studies, 40 effect sizes, 30 web searches.
Build TOC Current Reality Trees โ connect Undesirable Effects via sufficient-cause logic to identify 1-3 root causes.
Scan a pairwise comparison matrix for preference cycles and compute transitivity metrics.
Design structured data extraction form for systematic meta-analysis data collection
Designs debate structure based on artifact type โ selects attack vectors, assigns perspectives, determines escalation ladder, and configures round parameters.
Generates structured criticism from attack stance using Toulmin model. Produces claims, grounds, warrants, and rebuttals targeting artifact weaknesses.
Responds to attacks with counter-evidence and counter-arguments. Defends artifact using evidence, clarification, and rebuttal while acknowledging valid criticisms.
Evaluates debate exchanges, adjudicates argument quality, and produces round verdicts with confidence scores and reasoning.
Extracts key turning points, patterns, and insights from completed debate transcripts. Produces structured summary for verdict synthesis.
Identify which uncertainties would actually change the research direction decision. Compute EVPI to prioritize uncertainty reduction.
Strategy: decompose a complex research question into a hierarchy of independently answerable sub-questions
Derive logical consequences step by step from a given premise, building a traceable derivation chain.
Strategy: deduce hypotheses from existing theory
Deep Insight Engine with 5 campaigns (gap-analysis, insight, boundary-analysis, sensitivity-analysis, problem-reformulation). Use this skill whenever a user needs to deeply analyze research gaps, understand root causes, probe method boundaries, assessโฆ
Precise, targeted investigation of a specific sub-problem โ few papers, all read in full depth. High paper-research ratio (50% deep-read rate). Use when the user knows exactly what they need to understand and requires detailed technical analysis withโฆ
Full-page web reading for non-academic perspectives โ blogs, tech reports, product pages, industry analysis. Spawns a subagent to read pages in isolated context. Hard constraint: at least 30 web pages read in full.
Formalize search queries and inclusion/exclusion criteria for systematic surveys. Produces a reproducible search protocol document. Used by systematic-survey.
Strategy for small-N complete pairwise comparison using Bradley-Terry, Thurstone, AHP, and Borda methods to produce calibrated rankings.
What must be completed first? โ Dependency chain analysis + prerequisite graph construction
Build task dependency graph with predecessor/successor relationships
Identify critical dependencies from ablation results, producing a dependency graph and highlighting critical components.
Determine task dependencies and execution order
Complete DBA process: problem reframe โ source search โ map โ transfer โ adapt. Full Design-by-Analogy methodology for systematic analogical design.
Strategy: Research design-level FMEA โ function analysis, failure mode identification, severity/occurrence/detection scoring per AIAG-VDA 2019.
Build the experiment design matrix with proper orthogonality and balance
Parametric variation + constraint satisfaction combinatorial search
Visualize explored/unexplored regions of solution space
Generate structured description of design space
Synthesize all assumption destruction outputs into structured destructive innovation report.
Rate detectability 1-10 (inverted: 10 = hardest to detect). Estimates how likely current controls would catch the failure before impact.
Construct the strongest possible counter-argument against a position, steelmanning the opposition before attacking.
Surface Argyris governing variables and test whether the problem dissolves under alternative governing variables (double-loop learning).
Hegelian thesis-antithesis-synthesis cycle โ propose position, generate opposition, structured debate, synthesize transcending insight. Combines evaporating-cloud and polarity-mapping SOPs.
Score a single readiness dimension for a candidate with evidence and gap analysis.