Skip to main content

code-review-patterns

Multi-dimensional code assessment across security, quality, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting (>=80%) and Router Contract generation.

Quellinformationen

Repository
a5c-ai/babysitter
Letzte Quellaktivität
1. Juni 2026 um 07:46
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
1.813
Forks
111

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
code-review-patterns
description
Multi-dimensional code assessment across security, quality, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting (>=80%) and Router Contract generation.
allowed-tools
Read, Bash, Grep, Glob
graph
{"domains":["domain:software-engineering"],"skillAreas":["skill-area:agentic-loops","skill-area:orchestration-loop"],"workflows":["workflow:feature-development"],"topics":["topic:developer-experience"],"roles":["role:tech-lead","role:backend-engineer"]}
- Injection vulnerabilities (SQL, XSS, command) - Authentication and authorization patterns - Secrets handling (no hardcoded credentials) - Input validation and sanitization ### Quality (weight: 25%) - Naming conventions and consistency - Code structure (SRP, cohesion, coupling) - Error handling completeness - Type safety (no `any` escapes) ### Performance (weight: 20%) - Algorithmic complexity (flag O(n^2) or worse) - Resource and memory leaks - Database query efficiency (N+1) - Caching opportunities ### Maintainability (weight: 25%) - Documentation (JSDoc/TSDoc for public APIs) - Test coverage adequacy - Readability (function length, nesting depth) - Tech debt markers (TODO, FIXME) ## Confidence Gating - Only report issues with confidence >= 80% - Empty catch blocks are always critical (100% confidence) - Classify: critical, high, medium, low - Include actionable remediation for each issue ## Router Contract Every review must produce: STATUS, BLOCKING, REQUIRES_REMEDIATION, issue counts. ## When to Use - Code review step in BUILD workflow - Fix review in DEBUG workflow - Full REVIEW workflow ## Agents Used - `code-reviewer` (primary consumer) - `silent-failure-hunter` (error handling dimension)
Auf GitHub ansehen