Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Improve multimodal LLMs on fine-grained visual reasoning tasks (e.g., reading transit maps) by decomposing training into stages: basic perception (VQA) -> simple reasoning -> complex spatial reasoning. Incorporates 'detail rewards' for intermediate visual understanding, bootstrapping models from simple to complex tasks while addressing sparse reward challenges.
RewardMap: Bootstrapping Visual Reasoning via Staged Reward Design
Fine-grained visual reasoning tasks—reading complex diagrams, reasoning about spatial relationships, extracting details from images—are notoriously hard for multimodal LLMs. The challenge is that end-to-end RL on these tasks produces sparse rewards: the model either completely solves a transit map puzzle or gets zero reward. This forces the model to learn everything simultaneously, which is inefficient.
RewardMap decomposes this into stages: start with simple perception tasks (answering basic questions about images), advance to spatial reasoning, and finish with complex multi-step tasks. Each stage includes intermediate "detail rewards" that provide richer supervision, turning sparse binary rewards into dense signals that guide learning.
Core Concept
RewardMap's multi-stage curriculum uses three reward types:
Perception rewards: VQA-style questions about visual details (e.g., "What color is this box?") Score: 1 if correct.
Intermediate rewards: Partial reasoning steps (e.g., "Did you correctly identify the starting point?") Score: 0-1 based on intermediate correctness.
Task rewards: Full problem completion (e.g., "Did you find the correct transit route?") Score: 1 if task solved.
By training stage-by-stage with appropriate reward signals, the model learns perception first, then spatial reasoning, then complex multi-step logic—building capabilities progressively rather than learning all at once.
Architecture Overview
Stage 1 (Perception): Simple VQA on image details, binary rewards
Stage 2 (Basic Reasoning): Spatial understanding (which object is left of X?), detail rewards
Stage 3 (Complex Reasoning): Full task completion (find route from A to B), combined rewards
Reward module: Computes detail, intermediate, and task-level rewards
Data curator: ReasonMap-Plus dataset with annotated intermediate steps
Implementation Steps
Start by building the perception stage with VQA rewards:
import torch
import torch.nn.functional as F
classVQARewardComputer:
"""
Compute perception-level rewards from visual question answering.
"""def__init__():
.vqa_model = vqa_model
():
ground_truth = .vqa_model.get_answer(image, question)
is_correct = predicted_answer.strip().lower() == ground_truth.lower()
(is_correct)
():
rewards = []
img, ans, q (images, answers, questions):
reward = .compute_perception_reward(img, ans, q)
rewards.append(reward)
torch.tensor(rewards)
self, vqa_model
self
# Pretrained VQA answerer
def
compute_perception_reward
self, image, predicted_answer, question
"""
Score predicted answer against ground truth using VQA.
Args:
image: Visual input (PIL or tensor)
predicted_answer: Model's predicted answer (text)
question: VQA question (e.g., "What color is the top box?")
Returns:
reward: 1.0 if correct, 0.0 otherwise
"""
# Get ground truth answer from VQA model
self
# Simple string match for now (could use embeddings)
Multimodal LLM training where perception is a bottleneck
Tasks where you can specify intermediate milestones
Compute budgets support multi-stage training
When NOT to use:
Simple visual tasks (classification, detection) — standard supervised learning is simpler
Tasks without clear intermediate steps
Single-stage end-to-end optimization is acceptable
Extreme time constraints (curriculum overhead may not pay off early)
Training efficiency improvements:
Approach
Accuracy
Total Compute
Convergence
End-to-end RL
65%
100%
Slow (200 epochs)
RewardMap Stage 1-3
72%
110%
Fast (6 epochs)
Improvement
+7%
+10%
33x faster convergence
Reward configuration by stage:
Stage
Primary Reward
Secondary Reward
Typical Accuracy Gain
1 (Perception)
Binary VQA
None
40-50% → 60%
2 (Reasoning)
Detail rewards
None
60% → 70%
3 (Complex)
Task + detail
None
70% → 75%+
Common pitfalls:
Weak intermediate annotations: If step labels are incorrect, detail rewards train the model wrong. Validate annotations on 50 examples before full training.
Stage too long: If stage 1 takes 50 epochs, students get bored and diverge. Use 2-3 epochs per stage; let learning rate decay handle convergence.
Reward discount mismatch: All stages should have similar reward scales (0-1 range). If stage 3 has rewards in 0-100 range, adjust scaling.
Curriculum too rigid: Some examples are inherently hard. Allow examples to skip stages if needed (e.g., hard tasks go straight to stage 3).
Integration checklist:
Prepare full task dataset with annotated intermediate steps (50+ examples minimum)
Extract or generate VQA questions for perception stage
Train verifier model to score intermediate steps (validate on 30 examples)
Run stage 1 for 2 epochs; validate perception accuracy improves
Run stage 2 for 2 epochs; validate spatial reasoning improves
Run stage 3 for 3 epochs; validate full task accuracy improves