make-skill

name	make-skill
description	Use this skill when sedimenting a session into a reusable workspace skill. Triggers when the user wants to turn the current conversation, workflow, or troubleshooting path into a SKILL.md. Phrases like 'turn this into a skill', 'remember how I did X', 'save this workflow', 'make a skill from this', and any /make-skill <focus> invocation should fire this skill.
metadata	{"builtin_skill_version":"1.1","qwenpaw":{"emoji":"✍️","requires":{}}}

Make Skill

Turn the current session into a reusable workspace skill.

You orchestrate a two-phase flow:

• Phase A. Propose a compact plan, yield the turn for user approval.
• Phase B. On approval, write the full SKILL.md body based on THIS conversation, then persist via materialize_skill.

Do not call write_file to create the SKILL.md or any auxiliary files (scripts, JSON, etc.) directly. All initial file creation must go through materialize_skill (via the body and extra_files parameters), which runs the security scanner and writes the manifest atomically. After successful creation, use edit_file to modify existing files if needed.

Step 0. Determine the focus and derive a skill name

0a. Determine the focus

Two invocation paths:

• /make-skill <focus>. The focus follows the command verbatim.
• Natural language ("turn this into a skill", "save this workflow", "把刚才的 X 流程变成 skill"). Derive a short focus phrase from the conversation topic the user wants to capture. If ambiguous, ask a one-line clarification first.

0b. Derive the skill name

Derive the skill name from focus with this exact rule:

skill_name = "-".join(focus.split())

Internal whitespace (space, tab, full-width space, multiple spaces) collapses to a single -. Other characters stay as is.

Examples:

• cooking → cooking
• view image debug → view-image-debug
• 烹饪 食谱 → 烹饪-食谱
• Stock Price → Stock-Price (case preserved)

Use this skill_name consistently as plan.name in Step 1 and as the name= argument to materialize_skill in Step 3.

Step 1. Propose the plan and yield for approval

Call create_plan with all four required arguments (name, description, expected_outcome, subtasks):

• name: the normalised skill_name from Step 0.
• description: a COMPACT preview the user reviews. Two parts:
  • Part 1: Trigger preview. 2 to 4 sentences, plain language. Cover all three of:
    • Goal. The end result this skill produces.
    • Trigger. User phrasings and contexts that should invoke it. Be a bit pushy on synonyms.
    • I/O. What inputs it expects, what outputs it produces. Not yet SKILL.md frontmatter format; that gets distilled later.
  • Part 2: Step outline and batch plan. Two parts:
    • Step outline. Numbered list, one short verb phrase per line. No per-step detail, no parameters, no error handling, no sub-bullets, no ## sub-headings. Just the shape, so the user can judge ordering and scope. Draw step names from what actually happened in THIS conversation. Don't fabricate; omit anything not grounded in the conversation. Example layout (do NOT copy this content):

      1. <verb phrase, ~5-10 words>
      2. <verb phrase, ~5-10 words>
      3. <…>
      

    • Batch plan. Briefly describe how the steps above will be organised into run_tool_batch JSON files:
      • Which steps chain into one batch (or need to be split into multiple batch files).
      • Which intermediate steps would normally require agent involvement but can actually be replaced by scripts (regex matching, keyword filtering, JSON parsing, etc.), reducing agent interaction and keeping more steps in the automated batch.
      • List the expected files, e.g.:

        scripts/main.json      — main batch workflow
        scripts/parse.py       — parse snapshot to extract target content
        

      The goal is to replace as much agent-in-the-loop judgement as possible with scripts, so the skill executes with a single run_tool_batch call and avoids multi-round agent-tool interaction. This lets the user see the batch structure before approving.
• expected_outcome (plan-level, REQUIRED — distinct from the subtask's expected_outcome): one concrete sentence about what success looks like for the whole skill creation. Use the literal string "A new workspace skill <skill_name> is created, enabled, and invocable via /<skill_name>." with <skill_name> substituted.
• subtasks: a list with a single subtask:
  • name: "Write and materialize skill"
  • description: "Write the SKILL.md body and call materialize_skill."
  • expected_outcome: "Skill created and visible via /skills."

Write plan.name and plan.description in the same language as the user's recent messages. expected_outcome can stay in English.

After create_plan returns, yield the turn. The user will reply approve, refine, or cancel. The /plan mode's standard machinery handles the rest:

• Refine: call revise_current_plan with feedback baked into name, description, or step outline.
• Cancel: call finish_plan with state="abandoned".

When presenting the plan, render the standard plan card. Do NOT add ad-hoc fields like Subtask: … or Focus: … in the chat message. Use the normalised plan.name, not the raw focus. This step only proposes the plan and waits for user confirmation — do not call materialize_skill here.

Choose execution mode

After the user approves, ask about execution mode (yield one turn):

Plan approved. Should Phase B (writing and persistence) continue in the current conversation or run in the background via subagent?

• Current conversation: complete Phase B in this turn. Best when iterative refinement is needed.
• Background: delegate Phase B to a subagent without blocking the current conversation. The subagent inherits this session's full context and the approved plan.

Yield the turn and wait for the user's reply. If the user does not explicitly choose, default to current-conversation mode.

• Current conversation mode: follow Steps 2–5 below as normal.
• Background mode: see the "Background Phase B" section below.

If you are already a subagent (spawned by the main agent via spawn_subagent), skip the question and execute Steps 2–4 directly (the main agent already handled plan closure; do not call any plan-related tools).

Background Phase B

Phase A (Steps 0–1) is already complete in the foreground. The user has approved the plan. Now delegate Phase B to a subagent.

In this step you do not need to call materialize_skill or perform any skill-creation work yourself — just assemble a task description and submit it to the subagent, which will handle everything.

1. Assemble the following into a task description for the subagent:
   • The approved plan.name (skill_name) and plan content
   • Clear instructions: "Based on the current session context and the approved plan, execute make-skill Steps 2–4 in full: write the SKILL.md body, call materialize_skill to persist, verify batch references, test-run the batch. Report the result when done. Do NOT call any plan-related tools (create_plan, finish_subtask, finish_plan). Skip user approval and complete all steps autonomously."
2. Call:

   spawn_subagent(
       task="<task description above>. Do NOT call any plan-related tools. Complete all steps autonomously.",
       fork=True,
       background=True,
   )
   

3. Immediately call finish_subtask for the single subtask, then call finish_plan with state="completed". Do not wait for the subagent to finish.
4. Inform the user the task has been submitted. They can check progress via check_agent_task(task_id=...). The subagent will create the skill in the workspace without requiring user approval mid-process.

Plan-tools-unavailable fallback

If create_plan is not in your toolkit (plan mode disabled in this workspace), fall back to a text-based plan:

1. Write the same compact preview (Part 1 trigger + Part 2 step outline) as a plain chat message to the user.
2. End the message asking the user to reply approve, refine, or cancel.
3. Yield the turn. On approve, jump to Step 2 (write the body) using the outline you proposed. On refine, revise the text plan and yield again. On cancel, stop here.
4. Skip the finish_subtask / finish_plan calls in Step 5; they don't apply when there's no plan.

Step 2. On approval, write the SKILL.md body

Once the user approves the plan and the single subtask is in-progress, write a complete, detailed SKILL.md body grounded in THIS conversation. Length is fine when content is load-bearing.

Writing style:

• Use the imperative form.
• Explain WHY non-obvious instructions matter (theory of mind for the next agent). Avoid heavy-handed MUSTs.
• Target body length under ~500 lines. If approaching that, split into sub-sections with clear pointers.

2a. Align with the approved step outline

Body sections align 1-to-1 with plan.description Part 2: same order, same scope. Use the step's verb phrase as the section heading. If the user refined Part 2 during approval, follow the refined version.

2b. Organise the full workflow into a batch JSON (preferred execution method)

The core of the SKILL.md body is a run_tool_batch call. When the future agent triggers this skill, it should call the batch directly rather than executing tools step by step. Per-step notes serve only as supplementary reference for debugging (see 2c), not as the primary execution instructions.

Review the tool-call sequence from THIS session and capture the skill's complete end-to-end workflow as a single run_tool_batch JSON file. From start to finish, all steps that can be executed unconditionally in sequence should go into the batch.

When applicable

• The skill's core workflow contains ≥ 2 tool-call steps.

• Typical scenarios: bulk file operations, search-then-process, multi- file modification pipelines, multi-step browser automation, etc.

• Most workflows can be fully automated with scripts. Don't give up on including a step in the batch just because it "looks like it needs judgement". The vast majority of intermediate processing — content extraction, result filtering, format conversion, conditional logic, data cleaning — can be programmed by inserting execute_shell_command calls into the batch. Two approaches:

  • Inline short scripts: write python3 -c "..." one-liners directly in command.
  • Standalone script files: put complex logic in .py or .sh files etc. under scripts/ (bundled via extra_files), and call them in the batch with execute_shell_command, e.g. "command": "python3 <skill_dir>/scripts/parse.py --param1 ${steps.<index1>.<path>} --param2 ${steps.<index2>.<path>}". Pass previous steps' output to scripts via command-line arguments (${steps.<index>.<path>}), and the script's stdout feeds subsequent steps through ${steps} references. This chains the entire workflow into a single batch with no manual intervention. Only steps that truly require real-time user decisions (e.g. "ask the user which option to pick", "wait for user confirmation") need to be excluded.

  ${steps.<index>.<path>} is not limited to script calls — any tool's arguments can reference previous steps' output. For example, pass read_file results to write_file, or feed a browser_use snapshot into execute_shell_command.

  Example — take a browser snapshot, extract keyword-matching content with a standalone Python script, and write the result to a file. ${args.keyword} etc. are runtime variables passed in via the args parameter when calling run_tool_batch, substituted before execution.

  scripts/extract_headings.py (bundled via extra_files):

  import sys, re, json
  
  keyword = sys.argv[1]
  snapshot_file = sys.argv[2]
  with open(snapshot_file) as f:
      text = f.read()
  items = [
      m.group(1)
      for m in re.finditer(
          r'heading "([^"]*' + re.escape(keyword) + r'[^"]*)" \[ref=(\w+)\]',
          text,
      )
  ]
  print(json.dumps(items, ensure_ascii=False))
  

  Batch JSON (scripts/extract.json):

  [
    {
      "tool_name": "browser_use",
      "arguments": {"action": "snapshot"}
    },
    {
      "tool_name": "write_file",
      "arguments": {
        "file_path": "${args.work_dir}/snapshot.txt",
        "content": "${steps.0.text}"
      }
    },
    {
      "tool_name": "execute_shell_command",
      "arguments": {
        "command": "python3 ${args.skill_dir}/scripts/extract_headings.py ${args.keyword} ${args.work_dir}/snapshot.txt"
      }
    },
    {
      "tool_name": "write_file",
      "arguments": {
        "file_path": "${args.output_file}",
        "content": "${steps.2.text}"
      }
    }
  ]
  

  This automates the "extract keyword-matching content from a snapshot" step that would otherwise require manual inspection: step 0 takes the page snapshot, step 1 writes it to a temp file, step 2 calls the standalone script which reads the file and extracts matches with regex, step 3 writes the result to the output file. Complex parsing logic goes into standalone .py files under scripts/. Both scripts and batch JSON are bundled into the skill directory via extra_files. When triggering the skill, just call:

  run_tool_batch(
    file_path="<skill_dir>/scripts/extract.json",
    args={
      "keyword": "search keyword",
      "skill_dir": "<this skill dir>",
      "work_dir": "<working directory>",
      "output_file": "result.json"
    }
  )
  

When NOT applicable (fall back to pure step-by-step)

The vast majority of workflows can be automated. Only fall back to step-by-step logic when ALL of the following apply:

• Content understanding cannot be rule-based — impossible to handle with keyword matching, regex, JSON parsing, or any rule-based approach; requires semantic understanding. (Note: if the user provides explicit search terms or filter criteria, that IS rule-based and should go into the batch.)
• Branching decisions cannot be predetermined — the user must judge what to do next based on runtime context, rather than being able to supply all parameters upfront when triggering the skill.
• The entire skill is a single tool call (no batch needed).

Even when a workflow contains steps requiring human judgement, still extract all mergeable consecutive steps into batch files. This means a skill may ship with multiple batch files — e.g. scripts/phase1.json (data acquisition phase) and scripts/phase2.json (result processing phase), with the agent making semantic decisions in between. Automate as much as possible.

SKILL.md body structure (when using batch)

The body should lead with the batch call:

### Execution

This skill ships with a batch JSON file `scripts/<name>.json`.

**Call `run_tool_batch` strictly in the format below, using `file_path`
to load the file. Do not construct your own `actions` list inline.**

`run_tool_batch` requires an **absolute path** for `file_path`. Use the
absolute directory path you see when reading this SKILL.md to construct
the full path.

```
run_tool_batch(
  file_path="<this skill dir>/scripts/<name>.json",
  args={
    "param1": "<actual sample value>",
    "param2": "<actual sample value>"
  }
)
```

### Batch Parameters

Explain every parameter in `args`. Every variable used in the batch JSON
as `${args.<name>}` must be listed here:

* `param1`: what it controls; when the user should change it; the
  default/recommended value; example: `<actual sample value>`.
* `param2`: what it controls; when the user should change it; the
  default/recommended value; example: `<actual sample value>`.

When calling `run_tool_batch`, pass all parameters listed above. **Do not
pass `args={}` and do not omit `args`** when the batch JSON contains
`${args.<name>}` references; otherwise the placeholder may be used as a
literal filename, URL, or command argument.

### Batch failure handling

If `run_tool_batch` fails (returns `ok: false` or errors mid-way):
1. First verify every parameter listed in "Batch Parameters" was passed
   with a real value, especially that you did not pass empty `args={}`;
   then fix parameters based on the error message and retry.
2. If it still fails, try using `run_tool_batch` with an inline
   `actions` list instead of `file_path`.
3. If inline execution also fails, fall back to manual step-by-step
   execution using the "Step-by-step reference" section below.
4. After completing the task, tell the user: "The batch execution hit an
   issue so I completed the task manually. Would you like me to use
   edit_file to adjust and optimise this skill's batch script so it
   works correctly next time?"

### Step-by-step reference

The following details each batch step, for debugging or manual execution
only:

1. ...
2. ...

### Notes

(Place skill-specific notes here, such as parameter optimisation tips,
data format requirements, etc.)

**Execution reminder**: When triggering this skill, just call
`run_tool_batch(file_path=..., args=...)` as shown above to complete the
entire workflow. There is no need to write each action yourself
step by step. Only follow the "Batch failure handling" fallback if the
batch execution fails.

Path note: run_tool_batch only accepts absolute paths. Batch JSON files are written into the skill directory via the extra_files parameter of materialize_skill. The agent receives the skill directory's absolute path in its system prompt (the {dir} in Check "{dir}/SKILL.md"). The SKILL.md body must explicitly tell the future agent to use that absolute directory to construct the file_path.

Batch JSON writing guidelines

• file_path must be an absolute path. The SKILL.md body should explicitly say: "use the directory path you see when reading this SKILL.md and append scripts/xxx.json", so the future agent can construct the absolute path.
• Use ${args.<name>} to parameterise all values that vary by context (file paths, search keywords, URLs, etc.). Hard-code values that are always the same. The brace-delimited syntax is required so placeholders are unambiguous inside mixed-content strings like shell commands.
• The SKILL.md body must include a ### Batch Parameters section. That section must explain every ${args.<name>} used in the batch JSON: meaning, when the user should change it, default/recommended value, and one concrete sample value that can be used for a test run. The run_tool_batch example's args must contain those concrete sample values. Do not write {}, null, <description>, or only placeholder prose for required args.
• Use ${steps.<index>.<path>} for inter-step references — later steps can reference earlier steps' output. For example, "content": "${steps.0.text}" references step 0's text result. The <path> depends on the actual return value structure of the preceding tool. materialize_skill will automatically analyse all ${steps} references in the batch JSON and list them in its response. You must follow the prompts to call each referenced tool and verify that its return value actually contains the referenced field. If a field doesn't exist, use edit_file to fix the batch JSON file directly in the skill directory.
• Each action uses "tool_name" and "arguments" fields ("tool" + "args" also accepted).
• Max 50 steps per batch file. Split into multiple files if needed.
• JSON files are bundled into the skill directory via extra_files (see Step 3).

2c. Add step-by-step notes (reference documentation for the batch)

After the batch call section, provide brief per-step notes. These are reference material for the future agent when debugging or running manually — not the primary execution instructions.

For each step, answer from session facts (not common knowledge):

• Which tool, API, file, or command actually worked? Cite the real name. If multiple were tried, cite only the one that worked.
• What concrete parameters did it take? Use real argument values from the session.
• What errors hit this path, and how to avoid them? Phrase as preventive guidance.
• What dead-ends should be skipped? Mention failed paths only as terse avoid X reminders.

If the conversation doesn't contain a real answer for a question, omit it instead of inventing one. Inventing parameters or error notes is the most common failure mode of this skill.

When the skill is not suitable for batch (requires branching logic), these step-by-step notes become the body's main content and the future agent executes them sequentially.

2d. Optional sections

Add these only when they help a future agent. No fixed schema:

• Prerequisites. Env vars, auth credentials, expected input files, tool versions.
• Worked example. One realistic invocation, input through output.
• Failure modes and recovery. Known failure patterns and how to handle them.
• Edge cases. Anything surprising the next agent would otherwise stumble into.

Skip anything that doesn't apply. Empty sections are worse than omitted ones.

2e. Output format (only if stable)

If the session settled on a stable output shape (table, JSON schema, markdown template), document it once at the top of the producing step with an ALWAYS use this template: block. Example:

ALWAYS use this exact template:

| Ticker | Last close | Currency | Source |
|--------|-----------|----------|--------|
| <symbol> | <price> | <iso-4217> | <api-name> |

Skip this for skills whose output is genuinely free-form.

2f. Self-check before persisting

Re-read the body once and verify ALL THREE. Single pass, no second round:

• Concise. No redundancy; don't restate what's already obvious.
• Covers focus end-to-end. Every step from plan.description Part 2 is present in the body and substantiated by session facts.
• Correct. Every tool name, API name, parameter value, and error note accurately reflects what actually happened. No invented facts.

If any check fails, revise the body.

Step 3. Persist via materialize_skill

Call materialize_skill with:

• name: the same normalised skill_name you used for plan.name.
• description: a tight Use this skill when … string distilled from plan.description Part 1. ≤ 200 characters. Preserve synonyms and adjacent phrasings from the preview (LLMs tend to under-trigger skills, so a slightly pushy description is better than a narrow one).
• body: the reviewed SKILL.md body. No frontmatter; the tool renders it.
• extra_files (optional): if Step 2c produced batch JSON files or other auxiliary files, bundle them here. Keys are relative paths (e.g. "scripts/check-config.json"), values are file content strings. Example:

  materialize_skill(
      name="my-skill",
      description="Use this skill when ...",
      body="...",
      extra_files={
          "scripts/check-config.json": '{"actions": [...]}',
      },
  )
  

  extra_files keys are paths relative to the skill directory. The files are written into the corresponding locations under the skill directory. The SKILL.md body should tell the future agent to use the skill directory's absolute path (visible in the system prompt) to construct the full file_path for run_tool_batch.

Do not call write_file to create SKILL.md or auxiliary files directly. All initial creation must go through materialize_skill. After creation, use edit_file to modify existing files.

Step 4. Handle materialize_skill response

4a. Verify $steps references (when batch JSON is included)

When extra_files contains run_tool_batch JSON files, materialize_skill automatically analyses all ${steps.<index>.<path>} references and lists each reference's source tool and referenced field in its response.

You must check the returned reference list and verify that each referenced tool's return value actually contains the referenced field. Record your verification in a markdown table like this:

Reference expression	Source tool	Referenced field	Verification method	Result
${steps.0.text}	read_file	text	Check previous read_file call result in this session	✅ exists
${steps.2.content}	grep_search	content	Call grep_search once with sample args to confirm	❌ field missing, should be text

Two verification methods, in order of preference:

1. Check session history: if you already called that tool in this session, inspect the previous return value for the field.
2. Call and test: if you haven't called that tool yet, call it once with sample arguments and observe the returned JSON structure.

If any field reference is incorrect:

1. Use edit_file to edit the batch JSON file directly in the skill directory, fixing the $steps path. The skill directory's absolute path is available from materialize_skill's success response.
2. If the SKILL.md body contains related reference documentation that also needs updating, edit the SKILL.md in the skill directory directly with edit_file.

Do not call materialize_skill again — the skill is already created, just edit the files in place.

All references must pass verification before proceeding to 4b.

4b. Test-run the batch (when batch JSON is included)

After reference verification passes, try running the batch once with sample arguments to confirm the entire chain works end-to-end:

run_tool_batch(
    file_path="<skill_dir>/scripts/<name>.json",
    args={
        "param1": "concrete sample value matching the SKILL.md Batch Parameters section",
        ...
    }
)

If the batch JSON contains any ${args.<name>} references, the test run must pass concrete sample values for those args. Do not test-run with args={} or args=None, because that does not verify argument expansion.

• If it returns ok: true, the batch works — proceed to Step 5.
• If it returns an error, use edit_file to fix the batch JSON or helper scripts based on the error message, then re-run. Iterate until it passes or you confirm the issue cannot be fixed in the current environment (e.g. missing external dependencies, requires live network, etc.).
• If environment constraints prevent a test run (e.g. requires a browser, specific files that don't exist yet, etc.), skip the test and note in Step 5: "Batch was not test-run; recommend verifying on first use."

Only proceed to Step 5 after the test run passes (or is explicitly skipped due to environment constraints).

4c. Conflict (skill name already taken)

The tool returns the conflicting name and a suggested rename. Recover automatically; don't gate this on a user question.

1. Pick a fresh name. The tool's suggestion (e.g. timestamped) is fine, but anything that avoids the conflict works. Examples for an existing cooking: cooking-v2, cooking-2, cooking-new.
2. Call revise_current_plan to set plan.name to the chosen name. (In the text-plan fallback, just update your working name in memory.)
3. Call materialize_skill again with the new name.
4. When reporting success in Step 5, mention the rename so the user knows the original was taken. Example: "Saved as cooking-v2 because cooking was already in your workspace. Delete the old one and re-run if you want the original name back."

4d. Format error

Fix the SKILL.md content (frontmatter fields, body sections, etc.) and call materialize_skill again. Do NOT call finish_subtask until it returns success.

4e. Security-scan rejection

Remove the flagged patterns from the body and retry.

4f. Other errors

Adjust inputs and retry, or abandon the plan if the failure is not recoverable.

Step 5. Finish

Once Step 4a reference verification and 4b test-run pass (or test-run is skipped due to environment constraints), and materialize_skill returns success:

1. Call finish_subtask for the single subtask.
2. Call finish_plan with state="completed".
3. Tell the user the new skill is created and enabled, and they can invoke it via /<skill_name>.

---

Complete flow summary

Step 0   Determine focus → derive skill_name
          │
Step 1   create_plan → yield turn → user approves/refines/cancels
          │
       Choose execution mode → yield turn → user picks foreground/background
          │
          ├─ Foreground ──────────────────────────────────────┐
          │                                                    │
          │  Step 2  Write SKILL.md body (batch-first)         │
          │  Step 3  Call materialize_skill to persist          │
          │  Step 4  Verify refs → test-run batch → handle err │
          │  Step 5  finish_subtask + finish_plan + inform     │
          │                                                    │
          ├─ Background ──────────────────────────────────────┐
          │                                                    │
          │  spawn_subagent(fork=True, background=True)        │
          │  Main agent immediately finish_subtask+finish_plan │
          │  Subagent executes Steps 2–4 (no plan tools)       │
          └────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘