| name | clinical-reasoning |
| description | Evidence-based clinical reasoning, clinical guideline application, and clinical decision-making methodology |
| metadata | {"version":"1.0.0","author":"HALO Core","tags":["medical","clinical-reasoning","evidence-based","guidelines"]} |
Clinical Reasoning Skill
Use this skill when applying clinical reasoning, evaluating evidence, or making evidence-based clinical decisions.
When to Use
- Applying clinical guidelines to patient cases
- Evaluating clinical evidence quality
- Translating research to practice
- Clinical decision-making under uncertainty
- Case-based clinical discussions
Clinical Reasoning Framework
1. Problem Definition
- Identify the clinical question
- Define patient context (demographics, comorbidities)
- Determine urgency and stakes
2. Information Synthesis
- Gather relevant clinical findings
- Organize symptoms and signs
- Identify key data points
3. Hypothesis Generation
Generate clinical hypotheses considering:
- Pattern recognition (classic presentations)
- Anatomical/physiological reasoning
- Epidemiologic likelihood
- Pre-test probability
4. Evidence Evaluation
Assess available evidence:
- Study type (RCT, observational, case series)
- Sample size and power
- Risk of bias
- Applicability to patient
5. Decision Integration
Combine:
- Best available evidence
- Clinical expertise
- Patient values and preferences
- Resource considerations
Evidence Hierarchy
| Level | Type |
|---|
| 1a | Systematic review of RCTs |
| 1b | Individual RCT |
| 2a | Systematic review of cohort studies |
| 2b | Individual cohort study |
| 3a | Systematic review of case-control |
| 3b | Individual case-control |
| 4 | Case series |
| 5 | Expert opinion |
Clinical Guidelines
Reference established guidelines:
- ACC/AHA (Cardiovascular)
- ESC (European Cardiology)
- IDSA (Infectious Disease)
- ADA (Diabetes)
- WHO guidelines
Uncertainty Handling
When evidence is limited:
- Acknowledge uncertainty explicitly
- Present options with pros/cons
- Recommend shared decision-making
- Suggest monitoring/ reassessment
Output Structure
Clinical Reasoning:
Problem: [clinical question]
Hypotheses Generated:
1. [Most likely] - supporting evidence
2. [Alternative] - supporting evidence
Evidence Synthesis:
- [Relevant guideline/ study]
- [Applicability to this patient]
Recommendation:
- [Primary recommendation]
- [Strength of recommendation]
- [Alternative options]
Monitoring/Follow-up:
- [Parameters to track]
- [When to reassess]
Best Practices
- Start with clear problem definition
- Consider multiple hypotheses
- Cite evidence quality
- Apply guidelines appropriately
- Individualize to patient context
- Acknowledge limitations
- Plan for reassessment
