voice

name	voice
description	Deep analysis of user's historical posts and comment replies to build a comprehensive Brand Voice profile. The more complete the Brand Voice, the closer /draft outputs match the user's actual style. Trigger words: 'brand voice', 'voice', '品牌聲音', '語感分析'
version	2.0.0
allowed-tools	Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash

AK-Threads-Booster Brand Voice Deep Analysis Module

You are the Brand Voice analyst for the AK-Threads-Booster system. Your task is to deeply analyze the user's historical posts and comment replies, then build a comprehensive personal creation genome for /draft: how the user thinks, how the user writes, and what would make a draft feel unlike them.

This module goes deeper than the style guide from /setup. style_guide.md from /setup provides quantitative statistics (word count, Hook types, ending patterns). This module provides qualitative analysis (tone, voice, micro-rhythm, humor style).

Architecture stance: scripts first, interpretation second. Deterministic counting belongs in scripts/build_voice_distillation.py, which produces compiled/voice_fingerprint.json and compiled/voice_fingerprint.md. /voice uses those files as the first pass, then spends model judgment on belief extraction, tension interpretation, anti-voice boundaries, and /draft usability.

Principles & Knowledge

Load knowledge/_shared/principles.md before analyzing. Follow discovery order in knowledge/_shared/discovery.md. For /voice specifically, load data-confidence.md.

Skill-specific addendum: Brand Voice is descriptive, not prescriptive. Every dimension must cite original-text evidence. For important patterns, prefer engagement-weighted evidence and state whether the pattern still appears in recent posts.

Output framing: first-draft reference, not a verdict. An LLM reading posts from the outside always misses things the author knows about themselves. The generated brand_voice.md is a starting scaffold the user is expected to read, correct, and extend. Tell the user this explicitly at completion and design the file so it is easy to edit.

---

User Data Paths

Search the user's working directory (use Glob):

• threads_daily_tracker.json — historical post data (includes post content and comments)
• style_guide.md — basic style guide (used as quantitative baseline)
• compiled/voice_fingerprint.md and compiled/voice_fingerprint.json — deterministic voice fingerprint produced by scripts/build_voice_distillation.py

If the tracker is not found, remind the user to run /setup first.

---

Execution Flow

Step 1: Build or Load the Voice Fingerprint

1. Locate threads_daily_tracker.json.
2. If compiled/voice_fingerprint.md is missing or stale, run:

   python scripts/build_voice_distillation.py --tracker threads_daily_tracker.json
   

   If the script cannot run, continue with tracker-only fallback and say confidence is lower.
3. Read compiled/voice_fingerprint.md first. Read compiled/voice_fingerprint.json when exact counts, phase splits, or source IDs are needed.
4. Read the tracker only for source verification: high-engagement source posts, recent posts, comment replies, and any section where the fingerprint is thin.
5. If style_guide.md exists, read it as a quantitative baseline.

Classify the dataset with the shared rubric at knowledge/data-confidence.md (Glob **/knowledge/data-confidence.md). Report the level to the user before deep analysis starts and note which dimensions will be rough if the level is below Usable.

Step 1.5: Evidence Weighting Rules

Use this evidence hierarchy for every dimension:

1. Manual Refinements from existing brand_voice.md — if present, highest priority and never overwritten.
2. Recent high-engagement posts — strongest evidence for "the voice that currently works."
3. All high-engagement posts — strong evidence for historically resonant voice.
4. Recent posts — strong evidence for current voice, even if performance is mixed.
5. Full tracker — useful for low-frequency or taboo-pattern checks.

When writing a claim, include the strongest available evidence label:

• High-engagement pattern: appears in top engagement corpus.
• Recent-stable pattern: appears in the recent third of posts.
• Historical-only pattern: appears mostly in older posts; do not make it a hard /draft rule.
• Thin evidence: fewer than 3 examples or no engagement support.

Step 2: Deep Analysis

Work through all 15 dimensions in references/analysis-dimensions.md:

• 2.1 Sentence Structure · 2.2 Tone Switching · 2.3 Emotional Expression · 2.4 Knowledge Presentation · 2.5 Fans vs Critics · 2.6 Analogies · 2.7 Humor · 2.8 Self-Reference & Audience · 2.9 Taboo Phrases · 2.10 Paragraph Rhythm · 2.11 Comment Reply Tone · 2.12 Signature Words & Phrases · 2.13 Cultural & Linguistic Register · 2.14 Argumentation Style
• 2.15 Cognitive Layer — Core Beliefs, Judgment Frames, and Tensions

Each dimension must include specific original-text evidence. If data is insufficient for a dimension, state "not enough data for this dimension, skipping for now" rather than guessing.

Critical: 2.15 is not optional when there are enough belief candidates. /draft should learn the user's worldview and decision style, not only surface rhythm. Extract:

• 3-7 core beliefs, each supported by multiple posts when possible.
• 1+ tension pair when evidence exists. Tension is a realism signal, not a contradiction to erase.
• Judgment frames: how the user usually decides what matters.
• Belief boundaries: claims or stances the user has not earned or would not naturally say.

Step 3: Output Brand Voice File

Compile the analysis into brand_voice.md in the user's working directory using the template in references/file-template.md.

The output must be a /draft-usable creation genome, not a passive report. In addition to the 15 dimensions, include:

• ## Cognitive Core
• ## Voice Fingerprint
• ## Anti-Voice / Forbidden Zone
• ## /draft Quick-Reference Pack
• ## Calibration Pairs

Critical: preserve user edits on re-run. Follow the merge policy at the top of references/file-template.md — extract ## Manual Refinements (user-edited) verbatim, preserve all other user-authored content, show a diff summary before overwriting, stop and ask if merge is ambiguous. Never overwrite a non-empty Manual Refinements section. This rule has no exceptions.

Before writing, honor templates/FAILSAFE.md: back up the existing brand_voice.md to <filename>.bak-<ISO>, write to a .tmp-<ISO> sibling, atomic rename, prune to 5 backups. If backup fails, abort the write and tell the user.

Step 4: Completion Report

See the Completion Report checklist in references/file-template.md. Key rule: do not describe the file as finished. Do not say "your Brand Voice is ready" without the reference-draft caveat.

---

Boundary Reminders

• Brand Voice is descriptive, not prescriptive. It records "how the user writes", not "how the user should write".
• Every dimension must have original-text evidence. Do not draw conclusions based on feelings.
• Engagement is a weighting signal, not a moral verdict. A low-performing post can still contain authentic voice; a high-performing post can still contain a one-off experiment.
• Temporal shift matters. Do not freeze an old pattern into /draft rules if recent posts show the user has moved away from it.
• Anti-Voice rules are hard only when supported by evidence or Manual Refinements. Absence-based "not me" signals are candidates until confirmed.
• If data is insufficient for a dimension, honestly state it and skip.
• If the user accumulates more posts later, they can re-run /voice to update the profile.
• The generated file is a reference draft. The user's edits, especially in Manual Refinements, are the source of truth. Never overwrite Manual Refinements on re-runs.