Skip to main content

git-commit-message

Generates conventional-commit messages from staged changes: type prefix + English imperative subject (≤50 chars) + optional body explaining why. Use when the user asks to write, generate, or polish a git commit message.

Quellinformationen

Repository
alapha888/agent-skills-en
Letzte Quellaktivität
4. Oktober 2026 um 10:47
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
0
Forks
0

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
git-commit-message
description
Generates conventional-commit messages from staged changes: type prefix + English imperative subject (≤50 chars) + optional body explaining why. Use when the user asks to write, generate, or polish a git commit message.
license
MIT
# Git Commit Message Generation Generate a commit message from the actual staged changes (`git diff --cached`). The message must let a reader know "what changed and why" without opening the diff. ## Workflow 1. **Look at the changes**: run `git status --short` and `git diff --cached --stat` to confirm there is something staged. If the staging area is empty, stop and ask the user — never invent a commit message out of nothing. 2. **Pick a type**: choose exactly one type prefix based on the changes (if one commit mixes types, ask the user to split it): - `feat`: new feature - `fix`: bug fix - `docs`: documentation only - `refactor`: refactor (behavior unchanged) - `test`: add or change tests - `chore`: build, dependencies, misc 3. **Write the subject**: format `type: English imperative phrase`, ≤50 characters. Start with a verb: "Add…", "Fix…", "Remove…", "Unify…". Ban empty subjects like "update code", "some changes", "fix bug". 4. **Write the body (optional but recommended)**: 1–3 lines explaining *why*, not a play-by-play of *how*. Bug fixes must state the trigger conditions; features should describe the user-visible change. 5. **Output**: give a ready-to-run command, not bare text the user has to assemble. ## Rules - The subject is for skimmers; the body is for future-you in three months. Keep the two jobs separate. - A change mixing a feature and a refactor should become two commits, not one `feat` that papers over the mess. - No meta-commentary in the message ("generated by AI", etc.) — the message is about the change, nothing else. ## Minimal example (runnable) ```bash # 1. Look at the changes first git status --short git diff --cached --stat # 2. Suppose the change: added CAPTCHA verification to the login endpoint # Generated commit: git commit -m "feat: add CAPTCHA verification to login endpoint" -m "Blocks automated credential stuffing; CAPTCHA valid 5 minutes, account locks 10 minutes after 3 failures." ``` Another example (bug fixes must state trigger conditions): ```bash git commit -m "fix: keep order-list filters across pagination" -m "Trigger: filter first, then turn the page. Cause: page turns dropped the query params." ``` ## Anti-patterns - ❌ Writing a message for an empty staging area: no `git diff --cached`, no commit message. - ❌ Catch-all `chore`: labeling every feat and fix as `chore` until the type system means nothing. - ❌ Novel-length subjects: `feat: add a really useful feature that greatly improves the user experience` — the subject says *what*, leave praise to the user. - ❌ Body as implementation log: "first changed line 20 of a.py, then b.py…" — the diff already shows that; the body explains why.
Auf GitHub ansehen