Skip to main content

roadmap-generator

Generate phased implementation roadmaps with Epic/Story/Task breakdown, effort estimates, and validation checkpoints. Use when cto-architect needs to create actionable technical roadmaps from architecture designs.

Quellinformationen

Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-cto-team
Letzte Quellaktivität
4. Dezember 2025 um 11:59
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Mehrsprachig
Sterne
117
Forks
18

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
3 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
roadmap-generator
description
Generate phased implementation roadmaps with Epic/Story/Task breakdown, effort estimates, and validation checkpoints. Use when cto-architect needs to create actionable technical roadmaps from architecture designs.
# Roadmap Generator Creates structured implementation roadmaps that transform architecture designs into actionable plans with clear phases, milestones, and validation gates. ## When to Use - After architecture design is complete - When translating strategic goals into execution plans - Creating project timelines with realistic effort estimates - Breaking down large initiatives into manageable phases ## Roadmap Structure ### Three-Phase Framework Every roadmap follows MVP → Scale → Advanced phases: ``` Phase 1: MVP (Foundation) ├── Goal: Prove core value proposition ├── Duration: Typically 6-12 weeks ├── Success Criteria: Core functionality working └── Exit Gate: User validation / metrics threshold Phase 2: Scale (Growth) ├── Goal: Handle production load, improve reliability ├── Duration: Typically 8-16 weeks ├── Success Criteria: Performance SLAs met └── Exit Gate: Load testing passed / uptime targets Phase 3: Advanced (Optimization) ├── Goal: Competitive features, optimization ├── Duration: Ongoing ├── Success Criteria: Feature parity / differentiation └── Exit Gate: Business metrics achieved ``` ## Epic/Story/Task Hierarchy ### Epic High-level capability that delivers business value. - **Duration**: 2-6 weeks - **Format**: "Enable [user] to [capability]" - **Example**: "Enable customers to receive real-time order notifications" ### Story User-facing functionality within an epic. - **Duration**: 2-5 days - **Format**: "As a [user], I want to [action] so that [benefit]" - **Example**: "As a customer, I want push notifications so I know when my order ships" ### Task Technical work to complete a story. - **Duration**: 2-8 hours - **Format**: "[Verb] [object] [context]" - **Example**: "Implement WebSocket connection handler for notification service" --- ## Effort Estimation Framework ### T-Shirt Sizing | Size | Story Points | Typical Duration | Characteristics | |------|-------------|------------------|-----------------| | XS | 1 | 2-4 hours | Trivial change, no unknowns | | S | 2 | 0.5-1 day | Simple, well-understood | | M | 3 | 1-2 days | Some complexity, minor unknowns | | L | 5 | 3-5 days | Complex, some research needed | | XL | 8 | 1-2 weeks | Very complex, significant unknowns | | XXL | 13+ | > 2 weeks | Should be broken down | ### Estimation Guidelines 1. **Include buffer**: Add 20-30% for unknowns 2. **Account for context switching**: Multiply by 1.3 for teams juggling priorities 3. **New technology penalty**: Add 50% for unfamiliar tech 4. **Integration tax**: Add 20% for each external system integration ### Team Velocity Calculation ``` Effective Capacity = Team Size × Working Days × Focus Factor × Skill Factor Focus Factor: - Dedicated team: 0.8 - 50% allocated: 0.4 - Ad-hoc: 0.2 Skill Factor: - Expert team: 1.0 - Experienced: 0.8 - Learning curve: 0.5 ``` --- ## Validation Checkpoints ### Phase Gate Reviews Each phase ends with a validation gate: ```markdown ## Phase 1 Exit Gate ### Go Criteria - [ ] Core features functional in staging - [ ] Unit test coverage > 70% - [ ] Integration tests passing - [ ] Performance baseline established - [ ] Security review completed ### No-Go Signals - Critical bugs unresolved - Core functionality missing - Team capacity insufficient for Phase 2 - Business requirements changed significantly ### Decision [ ] GO - Proceed to Phase 2 [ ] CONDITIONAL GO - Proceed with identified risks [ ] NO-GO - Address blockers first ``` ### Mid-Phase Checkpoints - **Week 2**: Architecture validation - **Week 4**: Integration milestone - **Week 6**: Feature complete checkpoint - **Weekly**: Sprint review and course correction --- ## Dependency Management ### Dependency Types | Type | Description | Mitigation | |------|-------------|------------| | **Technical** | Service A needs Service B | Start B early, use mocks | | **Team** | Need DevOps for deployment | Reserve capacity early | | **External** | Third-party API integration | Validate early, have fallback | | **Data** | Need production data for testing | Create synthetic data | ### Critical Path Identification 1. List all dependencies 2. Identify longest chain 3. Mark critical path items 4. Add buffer to critical path (25%) 5. Parallelize non-critical work --- ## Output Format ### Roadmap Document Structure ```markdown # Implementation Roadmap: [Project Name] **Created**: [Date] **Owner**: [Team/Person] **Architecture Reference**: [Link to architecture doc] ## Executive Summary [2-3 sentences on approach and timeline] ## Timeline Overview [Visual timeline or Gantt representation] ## Phase 1: MVP (Weeks 1-8) ### Phase Goals - [Goal 1] - [Goal 2] ### Epics #### Epic 1.1: [Name] **Duration**: [X weeks] **Dependencies**: [List] | Story | Points | Owner | Dependencies | |-------|--------|-------|--------------| | [Story 1] | M | [Team] | None | | [Story 2] | L | [Team] | Story 1 | **Tasks for Story 1**: - [ ] [Task 1] (S) - [ ] [Task 2] (M) ### Phase 1 Exit Criteria - [ ] [Criterion 1] - [ ] [Criterion 2] ### Phase 1 Risks | Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation | |------|-------------|--------|------------| | [Risk] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Action] | --- ## Phase 2: Scale (Weeks 9-16) [Same structure as Phase 1] --- ## Phase 3: Advanced (Weeks 17+) [Same structure as Phase 1] --- ## Resource Requirements ### Team Composition | Role | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | |------|---------|---------|---------| | Backend | 2 FTE | 3 FTE | 2 FTE | | Frontend | 1 FTE | 2 FTE | 1 FTE | | DevOps | 0.5 FTE | 1 FTE | 0.5 FTE | ### Infrastructure Costs | Phase | Monthly Cost | Notes | |-------|-------------|-------| | Phase 1 | $X | Development environment | | Phase 2 | $Y | Staging + production | | Phase 3 | $Z | Full scale | --- ## Success Metrics | Metric | Phase 1 Target | Phase 2 Target | Phase 3 Target | |--------|---------------|----------------|----------------| | [Metric 1] | [Value] | [Value] | [Value] | | [Metric 2] | [Value] | [Value] | [Value] | --- ## Appendix ### Assumptions - [Assumption 1] - [Assumption 2] ### Open Questions - [Question 1] - [Question 2] ``` --- ## Anti-Patterns to Avoid ### The Big Bang Planning everything in detail upfront without iteration. **Fix**: Plan Phase 1 in detail, Phase 2 at epic level, Phase 3 at theme level. ### The Feature Factory Listing features without connecting to business outcomes. **Fix**: Every epic must connect to a measurable business goal. ### The Happy Path No buffer, no risk mitigation, assumes everything goes perfectly. **Fix**: Add 25-30% buffer, identify top 5 risks with mitigations. ### The Kitchen Sink Including every possible feature in MVP. **Fix**: Ruthlessly cut to core value proposition only. --- ## Python Utilities This skill includes Python utilities for roadmap generation: - `generator.py` - Core roadmap generation logic - `templates/` - Output templates (markdown, JSON) See [generator.py](generator.py) for programmatic roadmap generation. --- ## References - [Roadmap Templates](templates/) - Standard output formats - [Estimation Guide](estimation-guide.md) - Detailed estimation techniques
Auf GitHub ansehen