Skip to main content

delegate-setup

Configure delegation fleet lanes: which implementer CLI handles which kind of work, with optional model and effort (or variant) dials. Discovers installed CLIs, proposes a lane map for user approval, and writes global or project config only after explicit yes. Use when the user asks to set up, configure, or reconfigure delegation lanes, a fleet of lanes, or which implementer handles feature/tests/ui work — not for dispatching a coding task to an implementer.

Quellinformationen

Repository
amElnagdy/delegate-skills
Letzte Quellaktivität
7. Oktober 2026 um 15:34
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
2.358
Forks
195

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
7 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
delegate-setup
description
Configure delegation fleet lanes: which implementer CLI handles which kind of work, with optional model and effort (or variant) dials. Discovers installed CLIs, proposes a lane map for user approval, and writes global or project config only after explicit yes. Use when the user asks to set up, configure, or reconfigure delegation lanes, a fleet of lanes, or which implementer handles feature/tests/ui work — not for dispatching a coding task to an implementer.
license
MIT
compatibility
Requires Node 18+. No implementer CLIs are required — the skill discovers what is available.
metadata
{"version":"0.5.0"}
# Delegate Setup You are the **orchestrator** in **setup mode**. Discover installed implementer CLIs, propose a **fleet of lanes**, and write configuration only after the user approves. This skill does **not** dispatch coding work. It only authors the lane map. One concept: **lanes**. Never say “routes.” Example lane: **feature** → implementer `opencode`, model `opencode/grok`, variant `high` (OpenCode uses `variant` for reasoning intensity, not `effort`). ## When NOT to use this - The user wants a task implemented — use the matching `*-delegate` skill instead. - A one-off model change on a single dispatch — pass `--model` / `--effort` / `--variant` on that relay. ## Hard rules 1. Every lane **must** include `implementer`. 2. Put dials on the same object (`model`, `effort` or `variant`, …) only if that implementer supports them — see [references/schema.md](references/schema.md). 3. Show a human-readable lane table **and** the full JSON before every write; re-show after every tweak. 4. Write **only** after an explicit approval (“yes”, “approve”, “write it”). 5. Ask scope unless already clear: **global** (all projects) vs **this repo only**. Never create a project file just because cwd is a git repo. If there is no git repo, default to global and say so. 6. Do not invent model identifiers. 7. In interview or usage-scan mode, never write **any** dial the user did not give you and the schema does not require — omit it, so the CLI’s or relay’s own default applies. 8. Prefer 3–5 useful lanes over a kitchen-sink map. 9. Never edit `AGENTS.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, or other user agent-instruction files. 10. Never run a `*-delegate` relay from this skill. (`<skill-dir>` is this skill’s install directory — the folder that contains this `SKILL.md`.) ## Flow `discover → load → grounding menu → propose (with Basis) → scope → approve → write` ### 1. Discover ```bash node "<skill-dir>/scripts/discover.mjs" ``` Summarize installed vs missing, auth (`true` / `false` / `null` = unknown), and whether models were `reported`, `aliases` (curated aliases in the registry, not live discovery — full model names also work), `unsupported`, or `failed`. ### 2. Load existing (effective map) ```bash node "<skill-dir>/scripts/config.mjs" load --cwd "$PWD" ``` - Neither present → “No lanes configured yet.” - Otherwise → table of **effective** lanes with a Source column (`global` / `project`). Do not paste both raw files unless asked. - If `projectPresent` is true and `projectTrusted` is false, label the project lanes **untrusted**. They cannot dispatch until the user reviews and approves a project write. ### 3. Propose Discovery reports capability, never task fit. So ask **one** grounding question before proposing anything — one question, three options, not a wizard: > How should I pick the lanes? **(1) Quick defaults** — I decide, no questions. > **(2) Interview** — about four questions on how you want work allocated. > **(3) Usage scan** — I re-read your CLIs’ local session folders (counts and dates only, never the > conversations) and let the numbers place your lanes — if one CLI dominates, expect one question > about its role. Happy to do 2 and 3 together. - **Quick defaults** → propose immediately. - **Interview** → the four questions (allocation policy, never model rankings) and how to ask them (one medium per round) live in [references/setup-dialogue.md](references/setup-dialogue.md) — read it before you ask. - **Usage scan** → `node "<skill-dir>/scripts/discover.mjs" --usage`. Tell the user it is metadata only before running it. Each discovered CLI gains `usage: { sessions, lastUsed }`; `null` means no probe is wired — unknown, not unused. - **Both** → run the scan first, then ask only what the numbers cannot answer. - Inside a git repo, repo signals (languages, test weight, frontend share) are a fourth source of evidence. They do not change the menu; they feed the proposal and the `repo` basis. **That menu is also the consent surface** — the option chosen sets how much of the map is yours to decide: - **Quick defaults** — the user hired your opinion. A full map is legitimate, dials included; label every lane `my opinion`, say plainly that the map is your opinion, and keep it cheap to revise. - **Interview / usage scan** — evidence modes, so **every** dial is gated (rule 7): set one only from the user’s answer, or where the schema requires it (opencode lanes require `model`). Omitting is always safe — every dial has a default the user already lives with, and a CLI’s configured default is their standing choice, better evidence than your priors. Choosing which installed implementer gets a lane is still yours — Basis `my opinion` — but a dial that raises spend is not: offer your dial picks only as an addendum after the proposal, see [references/setup-dialogue.md](references/setup-dialogue.md). - **An unanswered question shrinks the map; it never licenses a substitution.** Propose fewer, more conservative lanes, name the axis you are blind on (no quota answer → say the map is quota-blind), and invite the answer anytime. Re-ask once at most; never backfill silence with priors. **Delegation economics.** The orchestrator reviews and lands every result — the review is the quality gate, so optimize total cost, not implementer prestige: - Prefer capable, authenticated, burnable, **low-usage** CLIs for bounded, objectively gated work (tests, mechanical refactors, straightforward fixes) when their reliability keeps review and rework economical — lanes push token burn away from the subscriptions the user is protecting. Low usage alone does not establish burnable: discovery cannot see plans, limits, or per-run cost, and a rarely-used CLI may be metered or deliberately avoided. Burnable comes from the user's quota answer — or, in quick defaults, from your labeled opinion. - Avoid binding a lane to a CLI the user is protecting or orchestrates from, by default; bind it only when the user asks for it or no acceptable alternative exists. Lanes are **orchestrator-blind**: the same lane fires from every seat the user drives from, and from that CLI's own seat it dispatches the CLI to itself. - Surplus placement breaks down when rework and review cost exceed the savings; when the implementer is flaky; when correctness rides on security, concurrency, migrations, or unstated domain knowledge; and when the output **is** the product (debate, architecture, research) — review limits damage, it does not manufacture a good first attempt. Bind those lanes to stronger implementers. - An explicit "spare X" answer removes X from proposed lanes by default, and overrides blanket posture answers on any lane the user explicitly retains for X — ask whether the posture applies there; omit the dial if unanswered. Never silently stretch one answer across an axis it conflicts with. Question phrasings for the burn/spare and trust interview live in [references/setup-dialogue.md](references/setup-dialogue.md). Then propose the lanes. Name them after the work the user described; fall back to `feature`, `tests`, `ui`, `fast`, `complex`. Installed implementers only. Show: | Lane | Implementer | Model | Effort / variant | Basis | Source (if updating) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | feature | opencode | opencode/grok | variant: high | your answer + schema requirement | — | | tests | codex | — | — | usage data | — | | ui | claude | — | — | my opinion (implementer) | — | **Basis** is mandatory on every lane: `your answer` / `usage data` / `repo` / `my opinion` / `schema requirement` (a dial the schema forces is neither evidence nor opinion — say so). A lane you picked from model-quality priors is `my opinion` — never present it as something the tooling determined, and “installed and authenticated” is capability, not evidence of fit. When a lane’s implementer and its dials come from different places, split the label — see [references/setup-dialogue.md](references/setup-dialogue.md). Then the **complete** JSON (`version`: `delegate-fleet.v1`). One line of why per lane; flag auth or model uncertainty. Schema and dial table: [references/schema.md](references/schema.md). ### 4. Scope - User said global / all projects / outside the project → `global`. - No git repo → `global` (say so). - Else ask once: global vs this repo only. ### 5. Approve and write On explicit yes, write **only** the chosen scope (validate first). Build the payload from that scope’s raw file (or an empty `lanes` object if new) — not from the effective merged `load` view, or a project write will shadow global-only lanes and a global write will promote project-only ones. Create a uniquely named file under the platform temporary directory (`$TMPDIR`, `%TEMP%`, or Node `os.tmpdir()`; never hard-code `/tmp`, which breaks on native Windows), write the **exact approved JSON** into it with the orchestrator's file-writing tool, and use that populated path as `<lanes-json>` below. Never validate an empty temp file. Remove the temp file after the validation/write attempt, whether it succeeds or fails. ```bash node "<skill-dir>/scripts/config.mjs" validate "<lanes-json>" node "<skill-dir>/scripts/config.mjs" write --scope global "<lanes-json>" # or: write --scope project --cwd /path/to/repo "<lanes-json>" ``` Re-read with `load`, then confirm the path written and the active lane names. Project writes bind approval to the exact config content; later changes fail closed until re-approved. On update, a short before/after is enough. ### 6. Ready to delegate Stop after confirming. Tell the user the map is ready. For later work: read the lane’s `implementer`, load that `*-delegate` skill, and dispatch with `--lane <name>` (explicit `--model` / `--effort` / `--variant` still win when passed). Do not start a delegate task unless they ask. ## Reconfigure Same flow. Show the effective current map, propose changes, approve, write one scope’s file. Reinstalling the skills package must not rewrite these files — they live outside the package.
Auf GitHub ansehen