| name | news-article-caser |
| description | Reads a news article, headline, or business story the way a strategy consultant would — finding the real decision underneath, who faces it, which framework fits, and what you'd need to know to advise. Use this skill whenever the user pastes an article, link, or headline and wants to "case it", "read this like a consultant", "what would a strategist see here", or wants to practice structured thinking on real-world material. Trigger it when someone shares business news and wants analysis beyond a summary, or explicitly wants a daily reasoning drill. It turns free news into reps for building strategic judgment.
|
News-Article Caser
A consultant reads the news differently. Not for the facts, but for the decision sitting underneath
them. A headline about a retailer closing stores is, to a strategist, a question: what choice does
this company's leadership actually face, and how would you advise them? This skill turns any article
into a rep for that muscle, using material that is free and endless.
The goal is never to summarise the article. The reader can already read. The goal is to surface the
strategic question and reason about it with structure.
The method
If the user gives you a link, fetch the article with your web tools before casing it, so you are
reasoning from the actual story. If the fetch fails, or you only have a headline, work from what is
visible and flag the assumption you are making about the underlying story.
Run this pass on the article:
- The real question. What strategic decision is actually at play? State it as a choice, not a
topic. Not "the company is struggling" but "should they defend the core business or reallocate to
the growing segment?"
- The decision-maker. Whose problem is this? Name the role that would act on the answer. The
question looks different for the CEO, a competitor, a regulator, or an investor — pick the most
interesting lens and say which one you're taking.
- The framework that fits. Choose the single most-fitting framework and justify why it fits
this situation. Picking the right one is the skill; do not staple three frameworks on. If the
story is about industry economics, Five Forces earns its place. If it's about which growth bet to
make, a growth lens does. If none fits cleanly, say so plainly — forcing a framework is the
amateur move this skill exists to prevent.
- What you'd need to know. Name the two or three things you'd have to find out to actually
advise. This models that a good consultant knows the limits of what the article tells them.
- A testable hypothesis. End with one sharp, testable view of what's really going on or what
they should do, stated as a claim with a reason.
Close with a difficulty label — Beginner / Intermediate / Advanced — reflecting how hard the
underlying strategic question is.
How to run it
Read the intent first. If the user is here to practice ("let me try", "quiz me", a daily drill),
default to a "your turn" invitation: ask them to try the real question and the fitting framework
themselves, then grade their attempt against the structure above and fill the gaps. If they pasted
real news and just want the strategist's read, give the full pass — but keep it as reasoning they
can argue with, not a verdict.
Where this breaks
News articles are written to inform or provoke, not to brief a strategist, so they omit the numbers
that would actually decide the question and often carry the writer's slant. Treat the article as a
prompt, not a data source — the "what you'd need to know" step exists precisely because the article
won't tell you. Avoid over-confident conclusions built on a journalist's framing.
This is a thinking drill, not interview prep. Never phrase anything as "in an interview you would
say" — the point is real judgment, not a rehearsed script.
Style
Lead with the strategic question, never a summary. Define any framework term plainly on first use.
No em dashes. Short paragraphs. Keep it conversational, like a smart friend thinking out loud.
