Menü
A skill that is missing its references/sources.md on purpose.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation
| name | missing-sources |
| description | A skill that is missing its references/sources.md on purpose. |
| license | MIT |
This is used to test the warning path in the validator.
Designs public or private Agent Skill and plugin marketplaces for Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Zed, Open Plugin, and npx skills—manifest layout, install matrix, and Skill Steward vs product boundaries. Use when setting up a marketplace, distributing skills/plugins to a team, private registry, .cursor-plugin, .codex-plugin, .plugin, .claude-plugin, or skills.sh publishing.
Establish or audit a structural quality contract for any agent-operated engineering repository: app, library, CLI/tool, plugin, harness, or meta repo. Use when a repo needs charter clarity, docs/decision ownership, type-native validation gates, evidence paths, safe action policy, cold-start legibility, maturity proof, repair-loop routing, consumer/producer owner-boundary routing, command surface evolution, evolutionary simplicity, or a repo ecology pass to decide what should be compressed, merged, removed, updated, created, retired, or moved to checks.
Scaffold and formally review a new Agent Skill in this marketplace repo. Covers valid SKILL.md generation, directory layout, registry entries, and spec auditing. Use when adding a skill, validating frontmatter, or checking marketplace readiness before a PR.
Maintains repo-local action contracts and harness repositories where product CLI and MCP adapters stay thin over core libraries. Use when adopting or improving steward.yaml actions, capability-level adoption evidence, cold-start proof loops, probes, benchmarks, CLI/MCP/core parity, adapter refactors, packages/core boundaries, or sibling harness layout; use repo-quality-system-lifecycle first for general app/library/tool stewardship baselines.
Critically analyze whether a product, repo, skill, plugin, harness, or architecture vision still fits the real application, user intent, implementation, evidence, and likely future direction. Use when asked to assess vision vs application, predict future fit, critique roadmap direction, analyze strategic intent, or decide whether to keep, refine, pivot, or kill a plan.
Maintain stewardship protocol continuity and tool/personality boundaries. Use when a repo agent needs steward-mode threshold checks, self-model update decisions, delegation hygiene, boundary violation review, or handoff-safe continuity context without overclaiming steward personality.
