visual-explainer

name	visual-explainer
description	Generate beautiful, self-contained HTML pages that visually explain systems, code changes, plans, and data. Use when the user asks for a diagram, architecture overview, diff review, plan review, project recap, comparison table, or any visual explanation of technical concepts. Also use proactively when you are about to render a complex ASCII table (4+ rows or 3+ columns) — present it as a styled HTML page instead.
metadata	{"version":"0.2.1","author":"arisng"}

Visual Explainer

Generate self-contained HTML files for technical diagrams, visualizations, and data tables. Always open the result in the browser. Never fall back to ASCII art when this skill is loaded.

Environment Detection

Before executing any skill operations, resolve the output path from the current working directory and use the runtime-resolved skill root for skill assets.

Path Identification

import os

# Resolve output under the active working directory.
cwd = os.path.abspath(os.getcwd())
diagrams_output = os.path.join(cwd, '.docs', 'diagrams')

# `skill_dir` is resolved by the Coding Agent runtime.
# Treat it as the canonical root for this skill's files.
skill_dir = "{{skill_dir}}"

Path Resolution

Use skill_dir as the base path when referencing skill files:

• Skill Path: {skill_dir}/SKILL.md
• Script Path: {skill_dir}/scripts/share.sh
• Reference Path: {skill_dir}/references/<file>.md
• Output File: {diagrams_output}/<filename>.html

Available Commands (Prompts)

Detailed prompt templates are available in {skill_dir}/commands/. In Copilot Chat, these can be invoked as workflow shortcuts (e.g., /diff-review) if registered as .prompt.md files in the workspace or user prompts directory.

Command	What it does
generate-web-diagram	Generate an HTML diagram for any topic
generate-visual-plan	Generate a visual implementation plan for a feature
generate-slides	Generate a magazine-quality slide deck
diff-review	Visual diff review with architecture comparison and code review
plan-review	Compare a plan against the codebase with risk assessment
project-recap	Mental model snapshot for context-switching back to a project
fact-check	Verify accuracy of a document against actual code
share	Deploy an HTML page to Vercel via deploy-to-vercel skill

Workflow

1. Resolve Paths: Set diagrams_output from the current working directory and use runtime-resolved skill_dir for skill assets.
2. Analyze Intent: Determine if the content is architecture, flowchart, sequence, or data-heavy.
3. Select Aesthetic: Pick a constrained aesthetic (Blueprint, Editorial, Paper/ink) to avoid generic output.
4. Draft Structure: Use the appropriate rendering approach (Mermaid vs. CSS Grid vs. HTML Table).
5. Generate HTML: Write the self-contained HTML to {diagrams_output}/<filename>.html.
6. Open Browser: Launch the file using start (Windows) or open/xdg-open (Unix).
7. Proactive Delivery: If the task involves a 4+ row/3+ column table, skip ASCII and go straight to HTML.

Core Principles

• Visual is Always Default: Extract structure into cards, diagrams, grids, or tables.
• Proactive Transformation: Don't wait for ASCII tables to become unreadable — render as HTML automatically.
• Aesthetic Commitment: Commit to a specific visual direction; vary choices between sessions.
• Self-Contained: No external assets except CDN links (fonts, Chart.js, Mermaid).
• Interactive: Always include zoom/pan/expand controls for Mermaid diagrams.

1. Think (5 seconds, not 5 minutes)

Before writing HTML, commit to a direction. Don't default to "dark theme with blue accents" every time.

Visual is always default. Even essays, blog posts, and articles get visual treatment — extract structure into cards, diagrams, grids, tables.

Prose patterns (lead paragraphs, pull quotes, callout boxes) are accent elements within visual pages, not a separate mode. Use them to highlight key points or provide breathing room, but the page structure remains visual.

For prose accents, see "Prose Page Elements" in ./references/css-patterns.md. For everything else, use the standard freeform approach with aesthetic directions below.

Who is looking? A developer understanding a system? A PM seeing the big picture? A team reviewing a proposal? This shapes information density and visual complexity.

What type of content? Architecture, flowchart, sequence, data flow, schema/ER, state machine, mind map, class diagram, C4 architecture, data table, timeline, dashboard, or prose-first page. Each has distinct layout needs and rendering approaches (see Diagram Types below).

What aesthetic? Pick one and commit. The constrained aesthetics (Blueprint, Editorial, Paper/ink) are safer — they have specific requirements that prevent generic output. The flexible ones (IDE-inspired) require more discipline.

Constrained aesthetics (prefer these):

• Blueprint (technical drawing feel, subtle grid background, deep slate/blue palette, monospace labels, precise borders) — see websocket-implementation-plan.html for reference
• Editorial (serif headlines like Instrument Serif or Crimson Pro, generous whitespace, muted earth tones or deep navy + gold)
• Paper/ink (warm cream #faf7f5 background, terracotta/sage accents, informal feel)
• Monochrome terminal (green/amber on near-black, monospace everything, CRT glow optional)

Flexible aesthetics (use with caution):

• IDE-inspired (borrow a real, named color scheme: Dracula, Nord, Catppuccin Mocha/Latte, Solarized Dark/Light, Gruvbox, One Dark, Rosé Pine) — commit to the actual palette, don't approximate
• Data-dense (small type, tight spacing, maximum information, muted colors)

Explicitly forbidden:

• Neon dashboard (cyan + magenta + purple on dark) — always produces AI slop
• Gradient mesh (pink/purple/cyan blobs) — too generic
• Any combination of Inter font + violet/indigo accents + gradient text

Vary the choice each time. If the last diagram was dark and technical, make the next one light and editorial. The swap test: if you replaced your styling with a generic dark theme and nobody would notice the difference, you haven't designed anything.

2. Structure

Read the reference material before generating. Don't memorize it — read it each time to absorb the patterns.

• For text-heavy architecture overviews (card content matters more than topology): read ./templates/architecture.html
• For flowcharts, sequence diagrams, ER, state machines, mind maps, class diagrams, C4: read ./templates/mermaid-flowchart.html
• For data tables, comparisons, audits, feature matrices: read ./templates/data-table.html
• For slide deck presentations (when --slides flag is present or /generate-slides is invoked): read ./templates/slide-deck.html and ./references/slide-patterns.md
• For editorial spreads, booklets, magazine-style layouts with cover + content pages: read ./templates/editorial-spread.html
• For prose-heavy publishable pages (READMEs, articles, blog posts, essays): read the "Prose Page Elements" section in ./references/css-patterns.md and "Typography by Content Voice" in ./references/libraries.md

For CSS/layout patterns and SVG connectors, read ./references/css-patterns.md.

For pages with 4+ sections (reviews, recaps, dashboards), also read ./references/responsive-nav.md for section navigation with sticky sidebar TOC on desktop and horizontal scrollable bar on mobile.

Choosing a rendering approach:

Content type	Approach	Why
Architecture (text-heavy)	CSS Grid cards + flow arrows	Rich card content (descriptions, code, tool lists) needs CSS control
Architecture (topology-focused)	Mermaid	Visible connections between components need automatic edge routing
Flowchart / pipeline	Mermaid	Automatic node positioning and edge routing
Sequence diagram	Mermaid	Lifelines, messages, and activation boxes need automatic layout
Data flow	Mermaid with edge labels	Connections and data descriptions need automatic edge routing
ER / schema diagram	Mermaid	Relationship lines between many entities need auto-routing
State machine	Mermaid	State transitions with labeled edges need automatic layout
Mind map	Mermaid	Hierarchical branching needs automatic positioning
Class diagram	Mermaid	Inheritance, composition, aggregation lines with automatic routing
C4 architecture	Mermaid	Use graph TD + subgraph for C4 (not native C4Context — it ignores themes)
Data table	HTML <table>	Semantic markup, accessibility, copy-paste behavior
Editorial spread / booklet	CSS two-page layout	Magazine-style presentation with cover + content spread
Timeline	CSS (central line + cards)	Simple linear layout doesn't need a layout engine
Dashboard	CSS Grid + Chart.js	Card grid with embedded charts

Mermaid theming: Always use theme: 'base' with custom themeVariables so colors match your page palette. Use layout: 'elk' for complex graphs (requires the @mermaid-js/layout-elk package — see ./references/libraries.md for the CDN import). Override Mermaid's SVG classes with CSS for pixel-perfect control. See ./references/libraries.md for full theming guide.

Mermaid containers: Always center Mermaid diagrams with display: flex; justify-content: center;. Add zoom controls (+/−/reset/expand) to every .mermaid-wrap container. Include the click-to-expand JavaScript so clicking the diagram (or the ⛶ button) opens it full-size in a new tab.

⚠️ Never use bare <pre class="mermaid">. It renders but has no zoom/pan controls — diagrams become tiny and unusable. Always use the full diagram-shell pattern from templates/mermaid-flowchart.html: the HTML structure (.diagram-shell > .mermaid-wrap > .zoom-controls + .mermaid-viewport > .mermaid-canvas), the CSS, and the ~200-line JS module for zoom/pan/fit. Copy it wholesale.

Mermaid scaling: Diagrams with 10+ nodes render too small by default. For 10-12 nodes, increase fontSize in themeVariables to 18-20px and set INITIAL_ZOOM to 1.5-1.6. For 15+ elements, don't try to scale — use the hybrid pattern instead (simple Mermaid overview + CSS Grid cards). See "Architecture / System Diagrams" below.

Mermaid layout direction: Prefer flowchart TD (top-down) over flowchart LR (left-to-right) for complex diagrams. LR spreads horizontally and makes labels unreadable when there are many nodes. Use LR only for simple 3-4 node linear flows. See ./references/libraries.md "Layout Direction: TD vs LR".

Mermaid line breaks in flowchart labels: Use <br/> inside quoted labels. Never use escaped newlines like \n (Mermaid renders them as literal text in HTML output). Example: A["Copilot Backend<br/>/api + /api/voicebot"].

Mermaid CSS class collision constraint: Never define .node as a page-level CSS class. Mermaid.js uses .node internally on SVG <g> elements with transform: translate(x, y) for positioning. Page-level .node styles (hover transforms, box-shadows) leak into diagrams and break layout. Use the namespaced .ve-card class for card components instead. The only safe way to style Mermaid's .node is scoped under .mermaid (e.g., .mermaid .node rect).

AI-generated illustrations (optional). If surf-cli is available, you can generate images via Gemini and embed them in the page for creative, illustrative, explanatory, educational, or decorative purposes. Check availability with which surf. If available:

# Generate to a temp file (use --aspect-ratio for control)
surf gemini "descriptive prompt" --generate-image /tmp/ve-img.png --aspect-ratio 16:9

# Base64 encode for self-containment (macOS)
IMG=$(base64 -i /tmp/ve-img.png)
# Linux: IMG=$(base64 -w 0 /tmp/ve-img.png)

# Embed in HTML and clean up
# <img src="data:image/png;base64,${IMG}" alt="descriptive alt text">
rm /tmp/ve-img.png

See ./references/css-patterns.md for image container styles (hero banners, inline illustrations, captions).

When to use: Hero banners that establish the page's visual tone. Conceptual illustrations for abstract systems that Mermaid can't express (physical infrastructure, user journeys, mental models). Educational diagrams that benefit from artistic or photorealistic rendering. Decorative accents that reinforce the aesthetic.

When to skip: Anything Mermaid or CSS handles well. Generic decoration that doesn't convey meaning. Data-heavy pages where images would distract. Always degrade gracefully — if surf isn't available, skip images without erroring. The page should stand on its own with CSS and typography alone.

Prompt craft: Match the image to the page's palette and aesthetic direction. Specify the style (3D render, technical illustration, watercolor, isometric, flat vector, etc.) and mention dominant colors from your CSS variables. Use --aspect-ratio 16:9 for hero banners, --aspect-ratio 1:1 for inline illustrations. Keep prompts specific — "isometric illustration of a message queue with cyan nodes on dark navy background" beats "a diagram of a queue."

3. Style

Apply these principles to every diagram:

Typography is the diagram. Pick a distinctive font pairing from the list in ./references/libraries.md. Every page should use a different pairing from recent generations.

Forbidden as --font-body: Inter, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, system-ui alone. These are AI slop signals.

Good pairings (use these):

• DM Sans + Fira Code (technical, precise)
• Instrument Serif + JetBrains Mono (editorial, refined)
• IBM Plex Sans + IBM Plex Mono (reliable, readable)
• Bricolage Grotesque + Fragment Mono (bold, characterful)
• Plus Jakarta Sans + Azeret Mono (rounded, approachable)

Load via <link> in <head>. Include a system font fallback in the font-family stack for offline resilience.

Color tells a story. Use CSS custom properties for the full palette. Define at minimum: --bg, --surface, --border, --text, --text-dim, and 3-5 accent colors. Each accent should have a full and a dim variant (for backgrounds). Name variables semantically when possible (--pipeline-step not --blue-3). Support both themes.

Forbidden accent colors: #8b5cf6 #7c3aed #a78bfa (indigo/violet), #d946ef (fuchsia), the cyan-magenta-pink combination. These are Tailwind defaults that signal zero design intent.

Good accent palettes (use these):

• Terracotta + sage (#c2410c, #65a30d) — warm, earthy
• Teal + slate (#0891b2, #0369a1) — technical, precise
• Rose + cranberry (#be123c, #881337) — editorial, refined
• Amber + emerald (#d97706, #059669) — data-focused
• Deep blue + gold (#1e3a5f, #d4a73a) — premium, sophisticated

Put your primary aesthetic in :root and the alternate in the media query:

/* Light-first (editorial, paper/ink, blueprint): */
:root { /* light values */ }
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) { :root { /* dark values */ } }

/* Dark-first (neon, IDE-inspired, terminal): */
:root { /* dark values */ }
@media (prefers-color-scheme: light) { :root { /* light values */ } }

Surfaces whisper, they don't shout. Build depth through subtle lightness shifts (2-4% between levels), not dramatic color changes. Borders should be low-opacity rgba (rgba(255,255,255,0.08) in dark mode, rgba(0,0,0,0.08) in light) — visible when you look, invisible when you don't.

Backgrounds create atmosphere. Don't use flat solid colors for the page background. Subtle gradients, faint grid patterns via CSS, or gentle radial glows behind focal areas. The background should feel like a space, not a void.

Visual weight signals importance. Not every section deserves equal visual treatment. Executive summaries and key metrics should dominate the viewport on load (larger type, more padding, subtle accent-tinted background zone). Reference sections (file maps, dependency lists, decision logs) should be compact and stay out of the way. Use <details>/<summary> for sections that are useful but not primary — the collapsible pattern is in ./references/css-patterns.md.

Surface depth creates hierarchy. Vary card depth to signal what matters. Hero sections get elevated shadows and accent-tinted backgrounds (ve-card--hero pattern). Body content stays flat (default .ve-card). Code blocks and secondary content feel recessed (ve-card--recessed). See the depth tiers in ./references/css-patterns.md. Don't make everything elevated — when everything pops, nothing does.