Skip to main content

phoenix-pr-description

Writes and maintains the body of a pull request opened by a coding agent on Arize-ai/phoenix, including a fixed "How this PR was made" section that reports steering, abandoned approaches, and verification gaps so a reviewer can pick a review depth. Use when opening a PR, editing a PR body, pushing more commits to an agent-authored PR, or when the user asks for a PR description, PR summary, or provenance section.

Quellinformationen

Repository
Arize-ai/phoenix
Letzte Quellaktivität
5. Oktober 2026 um 14:50
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
11.868
Forks
1.208

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
phoenix-pr-description
description
Writes and maintains the body of a pull request opened by a coding agent on Arize-ai/phoenix, including a fixed "How this PR was made" section that reports steering, abandoned approaches, and verification gaps so a reviewer can pick a review depth. Use when opening a PR, editing a PR body, pushing more commits to an agent-authored PR, or when the user asks for a PR description, PR summary, or provenance section.
user-invocable
true
metadata
{"internal":true}
# Phoenix PR Description A PR body lets a reviewer answer three questions at a glance: do I need to review this, how long will review and testing take, and should I hand it to my agent. Write only what serves those three. The author can always extend the body; a body nobody reads cannot be shortened after the fact. Default to short. A one-line What plus the provenance table is a complete body. Add a section only when a reviewer needs it to answer one of the three questions. ## Template Use these H2 headings in this order. Omit a heading when it would be empty. Never add others. ```markdown resolves #<issue> <- only when an issue exists ## What <one sentence: the change, ticket, dependency such as "Stacked on #16660"> <media: one video or screenshot; required when the PR changes rendered UI> <optional: up to 4 bullets, one sentence each, behavior not files> ## Try it <- only when a reviewer can exercise the change in under a minute 1. <step ending in what the reviewer should observe> ## How this PR was made | Agent | User turns | Steering turns | Questions asked | Sessions | |---|---|---|---|---| | <tool (model)> | n | n | n | n | **Starting point:** <the ask in a few words>; <bare / with constraints / with spec> **Steering:** <categories only, from: scope, approach, correctness, style> or none **Abandoned:** <approach, reason> or none **Verified:** <what ran>. Not verified: <gap> or none **Look hardest at:** <riskiest hunks> <sub>Stats as of <short sha>, counted from <method>.</sub> ``` Limits, all hard: - What: one sentence, then at most 4 bullets of one sentence each. No Why section; fold the reason into the sentence only when it is not obvious from the ticket. - Bold only on-screen control names. Code font for identifiers. No nested bullets, no file lists, no "Summary" or "Changes" headings, no closing paragraph. - Each provenance line is one line of at most 12 words. Steering names categories, not details. - Media: one item, bold caption above it stating what to notice. Required when the PR changes what a user sees (components, styles, layout, motion); capture it with the `phoenix-pr-screenshot` skill. When it cannot be captured, say why in What instead. - Total body above the provenance section fits on one screen without scrolling. Reference: Arize-ai/phoenix#16662 is the upper bound for a large change. Most PRs should be far shorter. See [examples.md](examples.md) for a large, a small, and a non-UI body. ## Provenance definitions | Field | Count | |---|---| | Agent | Tool and model, as the user names them | | User turns | Messages the human typed. Exclude approvals, tool results, system messages | | Steering turns | User turns that changed scope or approach or corrected output. Exclude "continue", answers to the agent's questions, approvals. Borderline counts | | Questions asked | Times the agent stopped to ask before acting | | Sessions | Distinct conversations, counting resumes and compactions separately | Describe the work, not the person. Paraphrase the ask; never quote it. Write "none" rather than omitting a line. Never grade the PR ("low risk", "thorough"). A one-prompt, zero-steering PR is a normal outcome and is reported as such. ## Counting Count from a record, not memory. One method is given; invent the equivalent for your own tool. Claude Code writes each session to `~/.claude/projects/<slug>/<session>.jsonl`, where the slug is the working directory with `/` replaced by `-`. Human messages are `user` entries whose `message.content` is a string: ```bash f=$(ls -t ~/.claude/projects/$(pwd | sed 's#/#-#g')/*.jsonl | head -1) jq -r 'select(.type=="user" and (.message.content|type)=="string") | .message.content' "$f" ``` Pipe through `wc -l` for user turns; read the lines to classify steering. Sum across files when several sessions contributed. With no record, or after a compaction, write `approx.` after each number and name the method in the stamp as "recall". ## Keeping it current Every edit to the body, including after review rounds, recounts the table and rewrites the stamp with the commit the stats cover. Reviewer-driven turns are user turns and usually steering turns. ## Before posting - [ ] Body above the provenance section fits on one screen - [ ] What is one sentence plus at most 4 one-sentence bullets - [ ] A UI change carries media, or What says why it has none - [ ] Every provenance line is present, one line, 12 words or fewer - [ ] Counts came from a record, or every number carries `approx.` - [ ] Stamp names the current head commit
Auf GitHub ansehen