contre-expertise

Critical, sourced counter-assessment ("contre-expertise") of a working method described by the user (articles, notes, practice README): extraction of the model into falsifiable propositions, author interview, multi-agent deep research (comparable methods, practices, cited sources), two-stage adversarial verification, rival method (challenger steelman), report with dated perishable verdicts, and a capped action plan in experimental format. Progresses incrementally by default (resumes from on-disk artifacts). Trigger: the user types /contre-expertise, asks to "audit my method", "critically review the way I work", "stress-test my practices against the state of the art", « passer ma méthode au crible », « analyse critique de ma façon de travailler », or wants their practice confronted with the state of the art without flattery.