Skip to main content

browser-testing

Patterns and templates for browser-based QA using Playwright. Covers navigation, form interaction, screenshot capture, visual verification, and CAPTCHA/auth handoff.

Quellinformationen

Repository
bdfinst/agentic-dev-team
Letzte Quellaktivität
5. Juli 2026 um 18:39
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
299
Forks
36

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
browser-testing
description
Patterns and templates for browser-based QA using Playwright. Covers navigation, form interaction, screenshot capture, visual verification, and CAPTCHA/auth handoff.
role
worker
user-invocable
false
# Browser Testing Skill ## Overview This skill provides reusable patterns for browser-based testing and visual verification using Playwright. Agents load this skill when they need to interact with a running application through a real browser. ## Prerequisites Playwright must be installed with at least the Chromium browser — `/project-init` installs it for frontend projects, or install manually: ```bash npx playwright install chromium ``` ## Playwright Patterns | Category | Description | | ---------- | ------------- | | Navigation | `goto`, `waitForSelector`, `waitForNavigation` with network-idle | | Form Interaction | `fill`, `selectOption`, `check`, `setInputFiles`, submit | | Click Actions | Click by selector/text, double-click, right-click, hover | | Screenshots | Full page, viewport, element, and clipped region captures | | Waiting Strategies | Selector appear/disappear, text match, network response | | Data Extraction | `textContent`, `getAttribute`, `inputValue`, `count`, `isVisible` | | Script Template | Full `/browse` boilerplate with error capture and console logging | | Error Handling | Common timeout, connection, and protocol errors with resolutions | | CAPTCHA/Auth Handoff | Detect walls, report to user, resume from `storageState` | See `references/playwright-patterns.md` for full code examples, the script template, and the error handling table. ## Fast Feedback Loop A verification pass is usually a *sequence* of related checks, not one isolated check — keep the loop cheap: - **Batch checks into one session.** Launch the browser once, run the full sequence of actions/waits/screenshots needed for the verification pass, then close — don't relaunch a fresh browser per individual check. - **Reserve `networkidle` for the first navigation.** After the initial `goto`, a re-check following a known, small change should wait on the specific signal that changed (`waitForSelector`, `waitForResponse`) rather than re-waiting on full network idle. - **Skip the reload when nothing routed.** If the change under verification didn't require a new route or a fresh document, act on the already-loaded page instead of calling `page.goto()` again or relaunching; use `page.reload()` only when a fresh document is genuinely required. - **Scope intermediate screenshots.** Prefer element/clip screenshots for the in-between checks in a sequence; reserve full-page screenshots for the final verification. The underlying principle — prefer the cheapest deterministic signal over a broad, expensive wait — is the same one that governs CI-gate test-suite design, but this section applies it to a single interactive verification session, not a project's test architecture. ## Visual Verification Guidelines When interpreting screenshots, describe: 1. **Layout**: Is the page structure correct? Any overlapping elements, broken grids, or overflow? 2. **Content**: Is the expected text/data visible? Any placeholder text or missing images? 3. **State**: Are interactive elements in the right state? (buttons enabled/disabled, forms populated, etc.) 4. **Responsiveness**: At the given viewport, does the layout adapt correctly? 5. **Errors**: Any visible error messages, 404 pages, or console errors captured? Compare observations against acceptance criteria when available. Flag discrepancies as findings.
Auf GitHub ansehen