Skip to main content

test-discipline

Design assertions that prove the actual contract and fail on realistic regressions

Quellinformationen

Repository
bradygaster/squad
Letzte Quellaktivität
11. September 2026 um 21:27
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
3.285
Forks
508

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
test-discipline
description
Design assertions that prove the actual contract and fail on realistic regressions
domain
quality
confidence
high
source
current regression tests and retained quality incident lessons
## Context Use this skill whenever a change affects an API, public interface, workflow contract, generated artifact, or user-observable behavior. A passing status-only test is not evidence that the intended artifact or contract is correct. ## Patterns - Update tests in the same change as an API, signature, export, or public-interface change. - Make assertions name and inspect the offending artifact, output, or configuration field—not just an exit code or broad success status. - Mutation-test critical gates by changing the real source or emitted artifact and proving the assertion turns red. - Exercise every caller path for a changed parser, normalizer, or helper; isolated unit coverage can miss the integration path that invokes it differently. - Reproduce working-tree-only failures locally when the contract depends on index, filesystem, line-ending, or generated-output state. - Keep expected inventory arrays synchronized with the files they enumerate. ## Examples A workflow-compilation test mutates the source workflow, compiles it, and inspects the emitted safe-output contract. A repair-script test constructs the actual index/blob/worktree state that the repair routine must handle instead of a simplified fixture. ## Anti-Patterns - Calling a test sufficient because it observes only a successful process exit - Mutating a hand-built fixture instead of the source or artifact protected by the gate - Testing a helper while omitting production callers - Treating a local checkout defect as something CI alone can validate
Auf GitHub ansehen