arecon-submission

name	arecon-submission
description	Use when running the final delivery preflight for a commissioned Annual Review of Economics (ARE) review via the Annual Reviews production system — disclosure statements, reference/format compliance, figure permissions, and the transparency/reproducibility of any meta-analysis the review itself contains. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Delivery Preflight (arecon-submission)

When to trigger

• "Delivering soon" — last check before handing the commissioned review to Annual Reviews
• Unsure which files, declarations, and permissions the production system expects
• Confirming reference style, format, and figure specs are Annual Reviews-compliant
• Verifying transparency obligations for any quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) the review itself reports

Process facts (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准 — re-confirm on the Annual Reviews author pages)

• Publisher / venue. ARE is published by Annual Reviews (nonprofit), founded 2009, as an annual volume; it is a review series, distinct from JEL (AEA survey of record), JEP (non-technical), and Handbook chapters. Articles are commissioned by the Editorial Committee; there is no cold-submission portal for unsolicited manuscripts — delivery happens within the invited-article workflow (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
• Open access. Volumes are published open access under the Subscribe-to-Open (S2O) model (2023–2025 converted; 2026 in production), under a Creative Commons license — there is no author-facing APC under S2O (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). Do not treat S2O as a pay-to-publish APC.
• Disclosure (required). Annual Reviews requires authors to disclose potential sources of bias / conflicts of interest; funding sources are stated. Prepare the disclosure as the author pages specify (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
• Reproducibility of the review itself. A pure review reports no new data. The transparency obligation bites on your systematic coverage (a documented, near-PRISMA-style account of how the literature was searched and selected, from arecon-literature-synthesis) and on any meta-analysis you contribute — its data and code should be reproducible and depositable (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
• Reference & format style. Annual Reviews applies its own house format and reference style (numbered/name style distinct from AEA author-year) at production; the production editor copyedits to house style, so the delivered draft need not pre-conform, but reference data must be complete and accurate (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
• Figures / permissions. Confirm figure specs and secure permission for any reproduced exhibit (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
• Length / abstract limits. Exact word/abstract limits are 待核实 — confirm on the author pages; typical published reviews run ~25–40 pages (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).

Preflight checklist

Article & files

• This is a commissioned/invited article delivered in the invited-article workflow (not a cold submission)
• Manuscript complete; references complete and accurate (house style applied at production)
• Title page: title, complete author affiliations, keywords; abstract in review style
• Figures meet current specs; reproduced exhibits have permission and attribution

Transparency

• Systematic-coverage account documented (search strategy, inclusion/exclusion) — near-PRISMA where applicable
• Any meta-analysis the review reports: data + code reproducible and depositable

Declarations

• Conflict-of-interest / potential-bias disclosure prepared per Annual Reviews policy
• Funding sources stated
• AI not listed as an author

Volatile re-confirms

• Exact length/abstract limits, current reference style, figure specs, disclosure format, S2O/OA status — re-checked on the Annual Reviews author pages (检索于 2026-06)

Anti-patterns

• Treating ARE like a journal with a cold-submission portal — it is invited; deliver through the commissioned workflow
• Treating S2O open access as a pay-to-publish APC (it is not author-funded under S2O)
• Omitting the conflict-of-interest / bias disclosure Annual Reviews requires
• Asserting a length limit, fee, or editor name from memory rather than the live author pages
• Delivering a meta-analysis with no reproducible data/code, or a systematic review with no documented search

Output format

【Article type】commissioned/invited review (not cold submission)? Y/N
【References】complete + accurate (house style at production)? Y/N
【Abstract + front matter】review-style abstract, keywords, affiliations? Y/N
【Transparency】coverage account documented; meta-analysis (if any) reproducible? Y/N
【Disclosure】COI / bias disclosure + funding prepared? Y/N
【Figures】specs met; permissions secured? Y/N
【Volatile re-confirms】length / style / OA / disclosure checked on Annual Reviews pages? Y/N
【Next step】deliver to Annual Reviews → arecon-review-process for what to expect

Supplementary resources

• templates/checklist.md — submission self-check
• templates/manuscript_template.md — lightweight manuscript scaffold
• ../../resources/official-source-map.md — official Annual Reviews URLs and volatile facts