| name | jbv-theory-development |
| description | Use when building the theoretical argument for a Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) manuscript — constructing a multidisciplinary mechanism (economics, psychology, sociology) for an entrepreneurial phenomenon, and choosing between hypothesis-testing and narrative/interpretive theorizing. Builds the argument; it does not pick the question (jbv-topic-selection) or run the analysis (jbv-data-analysis). |
Theory Development (jbv-theory-development)
When to trigger
- Your "hypotheses" are descriptive ("A relates to B in startups") with no entrepreneurial mechanism
- You need to choose the disciplinary engine — agency/real-options (economics), cognition/affect (psychology), networks/legitimacy (sociology)
- A handling editor or reviewer says the theory "could be about any organization, not entrepreneurship"
- You are deciding whether to write a deductive model or a narrative/interpretive theory
JBV's theory bar
JBV elevates "theories, narratives, and interpretations" of the antecedents, mechanisms, and consequences of entrepreneurship. Two legitimate paths:
- Hypothetico-deductive: derive testable hypotheses from an explicit mechanism. The mechanism must be about the entrepreneurial phenomenon — opportunity, judgment under Knightian uncertainty, resource assembly under resource constraints, legitimacy of the new and unknown (liability of newness), founder identity, etc. — not a generic organizational process.
- Narrative / interpretive: build an interesting, internally coherent account or process theory of how entrepreneurial action unfolds. JBV's stance is broader than the strict deductive template of many top management journals — a compelling reconceptualization can be the contribution.
Pick the disciplinary engine (and combine deliberately)
JBV is multidisciplinary by design. Make the lens explicit and consider integrating two:
- Economics: uncertainty vs. risk, search and experimentation, real options, information asymmetry and signaling in financing, incentives, selection markets.
- Psychology: entrepreneurial cognition, judgment and heuristics, self-efficacy, passion, affect, regulatory focus, grit, overconfidence.
- Sociology: networks, embeddedness, institutional logics, legitimacy, categories, status, social movements, regional/ecosystem structure.
State a clear mechanism: a causal/process chain with a why, scope conditions, and the entrepreneurial actor or activity at its center.
Build moderation/mediation around the phenomenon
- Moderators should reflect entrepreneurial context — uncertainty, resource scarcity, novelty, ecosystem support, founder/team attributes — not generic firm covariates.
- Mediators should trace the entrepreneurial process (opportunity belief → action → outcome), making the mechanism observable.
Checklist
Anti-patterns
- Generic-org theory in a startup costume — the mechanism would read identically for an incumbent.
- Hypothesis salad — many predictions, no unifying entrepreneurial mechanism.
- Borrowing a construct without a boundary — importing a psychology/sociology construct with no scope for the entrepreneurial setting.
- Pretend deduction (HARKing) — hypotheses reverse-engineered from results.
Theory pass for Journal of Business Venturing
Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the entrepreneurial mechanism, level of analysis, evidence design, and boundary conditions for ventures; then judge whether the current manuscript answers the venue's real reader: entrepreneurship reviewers who ask whether the paper advances venture formation, opportunity, founder, or ecosystem theory.
- Do the pass: Name the construct, mechanism, boundary condition, and falsifiable implication separately; do not let a literature summary masquerade as theory.
- Return a ledger: give
claim / evidence / risk / manuscript location rows, so the next agent can edit rather than rediscover the issue.
- Sibling guard: compare against Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice for broader entrepreneurship, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal for strategy interface, AMJ for general management; if a sibling owns the contribution, recommend re-routing before polishing format.
- Stop condition: do not give submission-ready advice until the pack's
resources/official-source-map.md has been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.
Output format
【Phenomenon mechanism】the entrepreneurial why, in one chain ...
【Engine】economics / psychology / sociology (+ integration) ...
【Mode】deductive hypotheses | narrative-interpretive theory ...
【Hypotheses or propositions】H1..Hk / P1..Pk ...
【Boundary conditions】...
【Tension challenged】...
【Next step】jbv-literature-positioning
