Skip to main content

evaluate

Evaluate the quality of any AI-generated artifact — visualizations, code, documents, conversations, or any skill output. Works in 3 phases: (1) Generate evaluation specs tailored to the artifact type, (2) Run comprehensive evaluation against those specs, (3) Produce a beautiful visual report using the /visualize skill. Use after any skill produces output, or invoke directly with /evaluate <file-or-context>. Supports evaluating: HTML visualizations, code projects, documents, agent conversations, slide decks, dashboards, or any artifact with quality dimensions.

Quellinformationen

Repository
careerhackeralex/visualize
Letzte Quellaktivität
6. März 2026 um 08:13
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
235
Forks
38

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
100 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
evaluate
description
Evaluate the quality of any AI-generated artifact — visualizations, code, documents, conversations, or any skill output. Works in 3 phases: (1) Generate evaluation specs tailored to the artifact type, (2) Run comprehensive evaluation against those specs, (3) Produce a beautiful visual report using the /visualize skill. Use after any skill produces output, or invoke directly with /evaluate <file-or-context>. Supports evaluating: HTML visualizations, code projects, documents, agent conversations, slide decks, dashboards, or any artifact with quality dimensions.
# Evaluate Comprehensive quality evaluation for any AI-generated artifact. Produces its report as a visualization. ## How It Works ``` ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Phase 1: SPEC GENERATION │ │ Analyze the artifact type │ │ Generate tailored evaluation criteria │ │ Define scoring dimensions + weights │ │ Set quality gates │ │ │ │ │ ▼ │ │ Phase 2: EVALUATION │ │ Run automated checks (when possible) │ │ Visual/manual inspection │ │ Score each dimension with evidence │ │ Identify systemic vs local issues │ │ │ │ │ ▼ │ │ Phase 3: REPORT (via /visualize) │ │ Generate a beautiful HTML eval report │ │ Scores, charts, screenshots, fix list │ │ Radar chart of dimensions │ │ Before/after tracking │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` ## Phase 1: Spec Generation For any artifact, generate evaluation specs by analyzing: ### 1. Identify Artifact Type - **HTML Visualization** → visual design, interactivity, technical, content, shareability - **Code/Project** → correctness, readability, architecture, test coverage, performance - **Document/Report** → clarity, structure, accuracy, completeness, tone - **Conversation/Agent** → helpfulness, accuracy, tone, efficiency, safety - **Slide Deck** → all visualization dims + narrative flow, persuasion, pacing - **Dashboard** → data accuracy, information density, scannability, actionability - **Custom** → derive dimensions from the skill's SKILL.md and stated goals ### 2. Generate Dimensions For each artifact type, produce 6-10 evaluation dimensions. Each dimension needs: - **Name** — short, clear label - **Description** — what this dimension measures - **Weight** — percentage (all weights sum to 100%) - **Scoring anchors** — what does a 10, 8, 6, 4 look like? - **Automated checks** — any programmatic tests (if applicable) - **Deductions** — specific issues and their point costs ### 3. Set Quality Gates Define gates based on the artifact's purpose: | Gate | Criteria | Meaning | |------|----------|---------| | 🚀 **EXCEPTIONAL** | Overall ≥ 9.5, all ≥ 9 | Best-in-class. Share everywhere. | | ✅ **SHIP** | Overall ≥ 9.0, all ≥ 8 | Production-ready. | | ⚠️ **ACCEPTABLE** | Overall ≥ 8.0, all ≥ 7 | Usable but not impressive. | | 🔧 **NEEDS WORK** | Overall ≥ 7.0 or any < 7 | Fix before releasing. | | ❌ **FAIL** | Overall < 7.0 or any < 5 | Major rework. | ### 4. Output Spec Document Write the spec to `eval-spec-[artifact-name].md` for reference and reuse. ## Phase 2: Evaluation ### For HTML Visualizations Open in browser at 3 viewports (1280×720, 768×1024, 375×667). **Automated audit** (run in browser console): ```javascript (function() { const audit = {}; const style = [...document.querySelectorAll('style')].map(s => s.textContent).join(' '); const html = document.documentElement.outerHTML; // Structure audit.hasDoctype = /^<!doctype html>/i.test(html); audit.hasLangAttr = !!document.documentElement.lang; audit.hasCharset = !!document.querySelector('meta[charset]'); audit.hasViewport = !!document.querySelector('meta[name="viewport"]'); audit.hasTitle = document.title.length > 0; // Menu system audit.menuExists = !!document.querySelector('.viz-menu'); audit.menuHasTheme = !!html.match(/cycleTheme|themeLabel/i); audit.menuHasDownload = !!html.match(/htmlToImage|html-to-image/i); audit.menuHasPrint = !!html.match(/window\.print/i); // Theme system audit.hasCSSVars = !!style.match(/--bg\s*:/); audit.hasDarkTheme = !!style.match(/(\.theme-dark|:root)[\s\S]*?--bg/); audit.hasLightTheme = !!style.match(/\.theme-light/); audit.themePersistedToStorage = !!html.match(/localStorage.*theme/i); // Typography audit.hasInterFont = !!html.match(/fonts\.googleapis.*Inter|font-family.*Inter/i); audit.hasFontFallback = !!style.match(/-apple-system|system-ui/); audit.bodyFontSize = parseFloat(getComputedStyle(document.body).fontSize); audit.bodyFontOK = audit.bodyFontSize >= 14; // Layout audit.usesFlexOrGrid = !!(style.match(/display\s*:\s*(flex|grid)/)); audit.hasMaxWidth = !!style.match(/max-width/); audit.hasResponsiveBreakpoints = !!style.match(/@media.*max-width|@media.*min-width|sm:|md:|lg:/); // Print & Accessibility audit.hasPrintStyles = !!style.match(/@media\s*print/); audit.hasPrintColorAdjust = !!style.match(/print-color-adjust/); audit.hasReducedMotion = !!style.match(/prefers-reduced-motion/); audit.hasAriaLabels = !!html.match(/aria-label/); audit.hasSemanticHTML = !!html.match(/<(header|main|nav|section|article|footer)/); // Animations audit.hasKeyframes = !!style.match(/@keyframes/); audit.hasTransitions = !!style.match(/transition\s*:/); // Performance audit.fileSizeKB = Math.round(new Blob([html]).size / 1024); audit.fileSizeOK = audit.fileSizeKB < 200; audit.noExternalImages = document.querySelectorAll('img[src^="http"]').length === 0; audit.htmlToImageLoaded = typeof htmlToImage !== 'undefined'; // Summary const bools = Object.entries(audit).filter(([k,v]) => typeof v === 'boolean'); const passed = bools.filter(([k,v]) => v).length; audit._passed = passed; audit._total = bools.length; audit._percent = Math.round(passed / bools.length * 100); audit._failures = bools.filter(([k,v]) => !v).map(([k]) => k); console.table(audit); return audit; })(); ``` **Visual scoring** — 8 dimensions for visualizations: | # | Dimension | Weight | 10 = | 6 = | |---|-----------|--------|------|------| | D1 | First Impression | 15% | Apple keynote quality | Generic template feel | | D2 | Typography | 15% | Perfect hierarchy, Inter font, fluid sizing | All same size, no hierarchy | | D3 | Color & Contrast | 10% | Harmonious, WCAG AA, both themes beautiful | Clashing, low contrast | | D4 | Layout & Spacing | 15% | Consistent rhythm, responsive, generous space | Cramped, broken at mobile | | D5 | Content Quality | 15% | Clear message in 5 seconds, zero filler | Confusing, placeholder text | | D6 | Interactivity | 10% | Menu + theme + download + print all flawless | Missing features, broken | | D7 | Technical | 10% | Zero errors, semantic, accessible, print-ready | Console errors, broken layout | | D8 | Shareability | 10% | Would tweet this unprompted | Worse than Canva | ### For Code/Projects Dimensions: Correctness, Readability, Architecture, Error Handling, Performance, Testing, Documentation, Security ### For Documents Dimensions: Clarity, Structure, Accuracy, Completeness, Tone, Formatting, Actionability, Brevity ### For Agent Conversations Dimensions: Helpfulness, Accuracy, Tone, Efficiency, Safety, Context Awareness, Tool Usage, Follow-through ## Phase 3: Visual Report (via /visualize) After scoring, generate the eval report as a **beautiful HTML dashboard** using the visualize skill: ### Report Structure 1. **Hero** — artifact name, overall score (big number), quality gate badge 2. **Radar Chart** — all dimensions plotted on a radar/spider chart (Chart.js) 3. **Dimension Cards** — each dimension as a card with score, bar, key notes 4. **Automated Audit** — pass/fail checklist with percentages 5. **Screenshots** — key views embedded (if HTML artifact) 6. **Fix List** — prioritized fixes as a kanban-style layout (critical / high / medium / low) 7. **Systemic Issues** — patterns that affect all outputs (flagged for SKILL.md fixes) 8. **History** — if re-evaluating, show before/after score comparison chart ### Report Filename `eval-report-[artifact-name]-[date].html` ### The report itself must score ≥ 9.0 on the visualize eval criteria. This is the ultimate dogfood test — our evaluation tool produces evaluations using our visualization tool. ## The Improvement Loop ``` Generate artifact (any skill) ↓ /evaluate → Spec + Score + Visual Report ↓ Review report → identify fixes ↓ Fix (systemic → SKILL.md, local → artifact) ↓ /evaluate again → compare scores ↓ Ship when gate = SHIP or EXCEPTIONAL ``` **Max 3 loops per artifact.** If it can't reach SHIP in 3 loops, the problem is in the skill — update the skill's instructions, not the artifact. ## Quick Start ``` # Evaluate a visualization /evaluate path/to/visualization.html # Evaluate with custom context /evaluate path/to/code-project --type code # Re-evaluate after fixes (tracks improvement) /evaluate path/to/visualization.html --loop 2 # Generate specs only (no scoring) /evaluate --specs-only --type dashboard ```
Auf GitHub ansehen