- name
- ask
- description
- Adaptive vault reader skill. Receives a natural language question, searches the vault first (Glob/Grep, entity reads, wikilink traversal), then self-assesses whether more context is needed. Escalates to /graphify for graph-level understanding or to /bedrock:teach for remote content ingestion only when the vault alone is insufficient. Answers simple questions with zero graphify calls. Use when: "bedrock ask", "bedrock-ask", "/bedrock:ask", any question about the vault, "what do we know about", "who owns", "what's the status of", "tell me about", "how does it work", or any Second Brain query.
- user_invocable
- true
- allowed-tools
- Bash, Read, Glob, Grep, Skill, Agent
# /bedrock:ask — Adaptive Vault Reader
## Plugin Paths
Entity definitions and templates are in the plugin directory, not at the vault root.
Use the "Base directory for this skill" provided at invocation to resolve the paths:
- Entity definitions: `<base_dir>/../../entities/`
- Templates: `<base_dir>/../../templates/{type}/_template.md`
- Plugin CLAUDE.md: `<base_dir>/../../CLAUDE.md` (already automatically injected into context)
Where `<base_dir>` is the path provided in "Base directory for this skill".
---
## Vault Resolution
Resolve which vault to query. This skill can be invoked from any directory.
**Step 1 — Parse `--vault` flag:**
Check if the input arguments include `--vault <name>`. If found, extract the vault name and remove it from the arguments (the remaining text is the question).
**Step 2 — Resolve vault path:**
1. **If `--vault <name>` was provided:**
Read the vault registry at `<base_dir>/../../vaults.json`. Find the entry matching the name.
If not found: error — "Vault `<name>` is not registered. Run `/bedrock:vaults` to see available vaults."
If found: set `VAULT_PATH` to the entry's `path` value.
2. **If no `--vault` flag — CWD detection:**
Read `<base_dir>/../../vaults.json`. Check if the current working directory is inside any registered vault path
(CWD starts with a registered vault's absolute path). If multiple match, use the longest path (most specific).
If found: set `VAULT_PATH` to the matching vault's `path`.
3. **If CWD detection fails — default vault:**
From the registry, find the vault with `"default": true`.
If found: set `VAULT_PATH` to the default vault's `path`.
4. **If no resolution:**
Error — "No vault resolved. Available vaults:" followed by the registry listing.
"Use `--vault <name>` to specify, or run `/bedrock:setup` to register a vault."
**Step 3 — Validate vault path:**
```bash
test -d "<VAULT_PATH>" && echo "exists" || echo "missing"
```
If missing: error — "Vault path `<VAULT_PATH>` does not exist on disk. Run `/bedrock:setup` to re-register."
**Step 4 — Read vault config:**
```bash
cat <VAULT_PATH>/.bedrock/config.json 2>/dev/null
```
Extract `language` and other relevant fields for use in later phases.
**From this point forward, ALL vault file operations use `<VAULT_PATH>` as the root.**
- Entity directories: `<VAULT_PATH>/actors/`, `<VAULT_PATH>/people/`, etc.
- Graphify output: `<VAULT_PATH>/graphify-out/`
---
## Overview
This skill receives a natural language question and answers it using an adaptive,
vault-first approach. It always reads vault content first, then decides whether
to escalate to graphify or /teach based on what's actually needed — not what the
question looks like in isolation.
**You are an adaptive context orchestrator agent. You only READ — never write, edit, or delete files directly.**
Writes happen exclusively through `/bedrock:teach` delegation (which flows through `/bedrock:preserve`).
If the query reveals outdated or missing information and no remote source is available to ingest,
suggest that the user run `/bedrock:preserve` or `/bedrock:teach` to update the vault.
---
## Phase 0 — Read Configuration
### 0.1 Load config
Read `.bedrock/config.json` from the vault root:
```bash
if [ -f ".bedrock/config.json" ]; then
cat .bedrock/config.json
else
echo "config_not_found"
fi
```
- **If config exists:** extract the value of `query.max_graphify_calls`. Store as `max_graphify_calls`.
- **If config does not exist or field is absent:** set `max_graphify_calls = 3` (default).
- **Valid range:** 1–5. If the value is outside this range, clamp to the nearest bound and log a warning.
---
## Phase 1 — Analyze the Question
### 1.1 Classify the question
Read the user's question and identify:
1. **Mentioned entities** — names of systems, people, teams, topics, projects, or discussions.
They may appear as:
- Exact filename (e.g.: "billing-api", "squad-payments")
- Human-readable name (e.g.: "Billing API", "Squad Payments")
- Alias or acronym (e.g.: "BillingAPI", "BRB")
- Contextual reference (e.g.: "the billing service", "the notifications team")
2. **Relevant domain(s)** — `payments`, `notifications`, `orders`, `integrations`, `checkout`, `compliance`, `internal-tools`.
Infer from the mentioned entities or the question context.
3. **Type of information sought:**
- **Status/overview** — "what is X?", "what's the status of X?"
- **Architecture/stack** — "how does X work?", "what's the stack of X?"
- **People/teams** — "who owns X?", "who works with Y?"
- **History/decisions** — "what was decided about X?", "what happened with Y?"
- **Relationships** — "what depends on X?", "how does Y relate to Z?"
- **Deprecation** — "what is being deprecated?", "what's the deprecation plan for X?"
### 1.2 Assess clarity
If the question is too ambiguous to produce a targeted search (e.g.: "tell me everything",
"how does the system work?", "what's going on?"), ask for clarification:
> "Your question is broad. Can you specify: which system, team, or topic would you like to know more about?"
If the question mentions something that clearly isn't part of the vault (e.g.: something personal,
unrelated technology), inform: "I didn't find anything in the vault about this."
### 1.3 Phase 1 classification result
At the end, you should have:
- **search_terms**: list of names, aliases, and keywords to search for
- **domains**: list of relevant domains (may be empty if not identified)
- **info_type**: classification of the type of information sought
- **explicit_entities**: entities mentioned directly by name (if any)
---
## Phase 2 — Vault-First Search
This phase **always runs** for every question, regardless of graph availability.
It is the foundation of the adaptive approach — read vault content first, decide later.
### 2.1 Read entity definitions
Use Read to read the entity definition files from the plugin (see "Plugin Paths" section):
- If the question is about a system → read `<base_dir>/../../entities/actor.md`
- If the question is about a person → read `<base_dir>/../../entities/person.md`
- If the question is about a team → read `<base_dir>/../../entities/team.md`
- If the question is about a topic/deprecation → read `<base_dir>/../../entities/topic.md`
- If the question is about a meeting/decision → read `<base_dir>/../../entities/discussion.md`
- If the question is about a project/initiative → read `<base_dir>/../../entities/project.md`
- If you don't know the type → read all entity definitions from the plugin to classify correctly
### 2.2 Search entities by name and alias
For each search term identified in Phase 1:
**Step 1 — Search by filename:**
```
Glob: <VAULT_PATH>/actors/<term>*.md, <VAULT_PATH>/people/<term>*.md, <VAULT_PATH>/teams/<term>*.md,
<VAULT_PATH>/topics/*<term>*.md, <VAULT_PATH>/discussions/*<term>*.md, <VAULT_PATH>/projects/<term>*.md,
<VAULT_PATH>/fleeting/*<term>*.md
```
**Step 2 — Search by alias in frontmatter:**
```
Grep: pattern="aliases:.*<term>" in directories: <VAULT_PATH>/actors/, <VAULT_PATH>/people/, <VAULT_PATH>/teams/,
<VAULT_PATH>/topics/, <VAULT_PATH>/discussions/, <VAULT_PATH>/projects/
(case-insensitive)
```
**Step 3 — Search by name in frontmatter:**
```
Grep: pattern="name:.*<term>" or pattern="title:.*<term>"
in the same directories (case-insensitive)
```
**Step 4 — Search by content (fallback):**
If steps 1-3 did not return sufficient results:
```
Grep: pattern="<term>" in entity directories (case-insensitive)
```
### 2.3 Filter by domain
If domains were identified in Phase 1, filter results:
```
Grep: pattern="domain/<domain>" in the found files (tags field of frontmatter)
```
Keep all results, but prioritize those matching the domain.
### 2.4 Read found entities
For each entity found (limit: 15 entities):
1. Read the frontmatter first (~first 30 lines) to confirm relevance
2. If relevant: read the full file
3. If not relevant (false positive from Grep): discard
Record for each entity read:
- filename, type, name
- wikilinks found in frontmatter and body
- external URLs found in the content (Confluence, Google Docs, GitHub)
- Explicit date in the filename (if any)
### 2.5 Follow wikilinks (1 level of depth)
For each extracted wikilink that is relevant to the question:
1. Resolve the file: search for `<wikilink-name>.md` in entity directories
```
Glob: <VAULT_PATH>/actors/<name>.md, <VAULT_PATH>/people/<name>.md, <VAULT_PATH>/teams/<name>.md,
<VAULT_PATH>/topics/*<name>*.md, <VAULT_PATH>/discussions/*<name>*.md, <VAULT_PATH>/projects/<name>.md
```
2. Read the found file (frontmatter + body)
3. **Do NOT follow wikilinks from this second level** — stop here to avoid context explosion
**Relevance criteria for following a wikilink:**
- The question is about relationships ("who owns", "what depends on") → follow all
- The question is about status/overview → follow team, people (focal points)
- The question is about history → follow related discussions, topics
- The question is about architecture → follow dependent actors
**Limit:** Do not read more than 15 entities total (2.4 + 2.5 combined).
If the limit is reached, prioritize entities directly mentioned in the question.
### 2.6 Phase 2 output
At the end of Phase 2, you have:
- A set of vault entities with their full content
- Wikilinks between them (structural relationships)
- External URLs found in their content (Confluence, GDocs, GitHub)
- A sense of whether the vault content covers the question
---
## Phase 3 — Context Assessment + Conditional Escalation
This is the core decision point. After reading vault content in Phase 2,
assess whether you have enough context to answer the question.
### 3.1 Self-Assessment
Evaluate the vault content you read in Phase 2 against the original question.
Determine one of three outcomes:
**`vault_sufficient`** — You have enough information to compose a good answer.
Indicators:
- The question is factual/status/ownership and the vault entities contain a clear answer
- Examples: "who owns X", "what's the status of Y", "what team manages Z", "what is X"
- The entities read in Phase 2 directly address the question
- No significant gaps in the information
**`needs_graphify`** — The vault content is partial but the knowledge graph could fill the gaps.
Indicators:
- The question involves code-level relationships, cross-domain dependencies, or architectural paths
- The vault entities reference systems whose connections aren't explicit in the markdown
- You feel you're missing structural context that the knowledge graph could provide
- Examples: "how does X connect to Y at the code level", "what are the dependencies of X", "trace the data flow from A to B"
**`needs_remote_content`** — The vault entities reference external URLs that appear directly relevant
to the question, but the content behind those URLs isn't ingested in the vault.
Indicators:
- An entity's `sources` field or body text contains a URL (Confluence, GDocs, GitHub) that likely holds the answer
- The question asks about something documented externally (e.g., "what's the runbook for X" and the entity links to a Confluence page)
- The vault has a pointer to the answer but not the answer itself
**Priority when multiple outcomes apply:**
`needs_remote_content` > `needs_graphify` > `vault_sufficient`
Rationale: remote content must be internalized first for the vault to be complete.
Graphify can run on richer data after ingestion. If both apply, handle remote content first,
then re-assess whether graphify is still needed.
**After determining the outcome:**
- `vault_sufficient` → skip directly to **Phase 4** (recency) then **Phase 5** (respond)
- `needs_graphify` → proceed to **Phase 3-G**
- `needs_remote_content` → proceed to **Phase 3-T**
---
### Phase 3-G — Graphify Escalation
Execute only when the self-assessment determines `needs_graphify`.
#### 3-G.0 Check graph availability
```bash
if [ -f "<VAULT_PATH>/graphify-out/graph.json" ] && [ -s "<VAULT_PATH>/graphify-out/graph.json" ]; then
echo "graph_available"
else
echo "graph_not_available"
fi
```
**If `graph_not_available`:** Display the following warning and skip to Phase 4 with vault-only content:
> [!warning] Knowledge graph unavailable
> The knowledge graph is not available (`<VAULT_PATH>/graphify-out/graph.json` missing or empty).
> The answer below is based on vault content only — it may be incomplete for this type of question.
> Run `/graphify build` to rebuild the graph from the vault's actor repositories.
#### 3-G.1 Formulate graphify calls
Based on the gap between what you have (Phase 2 content) and what the question needs,
formulate 1–N graphify calls. Use the same modes as before:
| Gap identified | Graphify mode |
|---|---|
| Need to understand a single entity's code structure | `explain "<entity>"` |
| Need to find how two entities connect | `path "<entityA>" "<entityB>"` |
| Need broad relationship or dependency context | `query "<question about the gap>"` |
The LLM decides the calls based on what's missing — not from a pre-planned decomposition.
Never exceed `max_graphify_calls`.
#### 3-G.2 Execute graphify calls sequentially
For each call, invoke `/graphify` via the Skill tool. Append the structured JSON output instruction:
```
After completing the traversal, return ONLY a JSON object with this structure (no prose, no markdown fences):
{
"mode": "query|path|explain",
"start_nodes": ["node_id1", "node_id2"],
"nodes": [
{"id": "node_id", "label": "Human Readable Name", "source_file": "relative/path", "community": 0, "source_location": "file:line"}
],
"edges": [
Auf GitHub ansehen