SCAN environment, identify missing information, and produce an architecture plan BEFORE writing code. Prevents context-free code generation, wrong stack assumptions, and underspecified features. Trigger: user says "create a new project", "build an app", "start a new repo", "build a dashboard", "build a saas", or any request to scaffold from scratch.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
SCAN environment, identify missing information, and produce an architecture plan BEFORE writing code. Prevents context-free code generation, wrong stack assumptions, and underspecified features. Trigger: user says "create a new project", "build an app", "start a new repo", "build a dashboard", "build a saas", or any request to scaffold from scratch.
category
foundation
version
3.0.0
last_updated
2026-06-28T00:00:00.000Z
stacks
["All"]
triggers
[{"pattern":"create a new (project|app|repo|application)","action":"RUN intake workflow before any code"},{"pattern":"start (a|a new) (project|app|repo)","action":"RUN intake workflow before any code"},{"pattern":"(build|scaffold|set up) (a|an) (dashboard|saas|api|website)","action":"RUN intake workflow before any code"}]
User requests a MAJOR new feature that changes architecture
Current directory is empty (greenfield) or has no config files
Do NOT activate when:
User is modifying existing code (bug fix, refactor, style change)
Requirements-discovery-framework is already complete
DECIDE: Execution Path
IF greenfield project (empty directory) →
RUN Steps 1-3 (environment scan → missing info → architecture plan)
THEN implement using domain skills
IF brownfield project (existing codebase) →
RUN Steps 1-4 (environment scan → missing info → architecture plan → match patterns)
THEN implement following EXISTING conventions
IF requirements-discovery-framework already executed →
SKIP Step 2 (missing info already identified)
RUN Steps 1, 3, 4
THEN implement
EXECUTE: Instructions
Step 1: Scan Environment
Read these files (do NOT run ls or cat, use read_files tool):
tsconfig.json or jsconfig.json, detect path aliases, strict mode
next.config.ts or next.config.mjs, detect Next.js config
tailwind.config.ts or CSS @theme directive, detect styling solution (Tailwind v3 config file or v4 CSS-native)
docker-compose.yml, detect container setup
.env.example, detect required env vars
.github/ directory, detect CI setup
Key detection rules (2026):
Tailwind: Check for `@import "tailwindcss"` or `@theme` in CSS → v4 (CSS-native config)
Check for tailwind.config.ts → v3 (legacy config)
Next.js: Check for next.config.ts → App Router assumed
Check for app/ directory → App Router confirmed
Check for pages/ directory only → Pages Router
Check for proxy.ts (replaces middleware.ts in Next.js 16)
Auth: Check for auth.ts or auth.config.ts → Auth.js or Better Auth
Database: Check for schema.prisma → Prisma
Check for drizzle.config.ts → Drizzle
Check for supabase/ directory → Supabase
Package Mgr: Check for pnpm-lock.yaml → pnpm
Check for yarn.lock → yarn (classic) or yarn.lock + .yarnrc.yml → yarn berry
Check for bun.lock → bun
Check for package-lock.json → npm
Monorepo: Check for turbo.json → Turborepo
Check for nx.json → Nx
Check for workspace: in package.json → pnpm/npm workspaces
Build Tool: Check for vite.config.ts → Vite (any version)
Check for next.config.ts → Next.js (bundled Turbopack in v16)
Step 2: Identify Missing Information
After the scan, determine what's still unknown. Use the Requirements Discovery Framework for vague requests, or directly ask for specifics here.
ALWAYS clarify these blocking unknowns:
[ ] Framework choice, if not detectable from files
[ ] Auth requirement, "Do users need to log in?" (Changes architecture significantly)
[ ] Data persistence, "Need a database? Preference?"
[ ] Deployment target, "Where deployed?" (Vercel / AWS / Docker / other)
Clarify if project scope warrants:
[ ] Expected user scale → <10 / 10-1K / 1K-100K / 100K+
[ ] Accessibility requirement → WCAG 2.2 AA needed?
[ ] Data sensitivity → PII? Payments? HIPAA? SOC2?
[ ] Browser support → Modern only? Legacy?
NEVER ask about: UI colors, font choices, exact spacing values, features the user didn't mention.
Step 3: Produce Architecture Plan
Write this plan before any implementation code. Use exactly this structure:
Read 2-3 existing files per category and follow EXACT conventions:
API patterns: Response envelope shape, error format, validation location, status code usage
Component patterns: Server vs Client Components, naming convention, import style, UI library
Infrastructure: Package manager commands, test setup (Vitest/Jest/Playwright/none), linting (ESLint/Biome)
RULE: If existing routes use { data, meta } envelope → your routes MUST use the same.
RULE: If existing components use default exports → your components MUST use default exports.
Step 5: Create ADR (Significant Choices Only)
For non-obvious architectural decisions, create docs/adr/NNN-title.md: