review-grant

name	review-grant
description	Full grant review pipeline — runs compliance checker, study section reviewer, and proofreader on the T32 proposal. Aggregates all results into a single summary report.
disable-model-invocation	true
argument-hint	[optional: compliance | review | proofread — run only one stage]

Full Grant Review

Orchestrate a comprehensive review of the T32 grant proposal.

Steps

1. Parse the argument:

   • $ARGUMENTS = empty or all → run all three stages
   • $ARGUMENTS = compliance → run only compliance checker
   • $ARGUMENTS = review → run only study section reviewer
   • $ARGUMENTS = proofread → run only proofreader on all .tex files

2. Stage 1: Compliance Check Run the t32-compliance-checker agent on the proposal.

   • This checks section completeness, page limits, required content elements, and formatting
   • Output: quality_reports/t32_compliance_report.md

3. Stage 2: Study Section Review Run the nih-study-section-reviewer agent on the proposal.

   • This simulates a T32 study section review with scores and critique
   • Output: quality_reports/study_section_review.md

4. Stage 3: Proofreading Run the proofreader agent on all .tex files in proposal/.

   • Check each section file for grammar, typos, consistency, and academic quality
   • Output: quality_reports/proposal_proofread_report.md

5. Aggregate Results After all stages complete, create a summary report at quality_reports/grant_review_summary.md:

   # Grant Review Summary
   
   **Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
   **Stages Run:** [list]
   
   ## Compliance
   - **Status:** PASS / FAIL / PASS WITH WARNINGS
   - **Critical Issues:** [count and summary]
   - **Warnings:** [count]
   
   ## Study Section Review
   - **Overall Impact Score:** [N]/9
   - **Criterion Scores:** [list each]
   - **Top Strengths:** [top 3]
   - **Top Weaknesses:** [top 3]
   
   ## Proofreading
   - **Issues Found:** [count by severity]
   - **High Priority:** [list]
   
   ## Recommended Actions (Priority Order)
   1. [Most critical action]
   2. [Next action]
   3. ...
   

6. Report to user:

   • Summary of findings across all three stages
   • Paths to all generated reports
   • Recommended next steps in priority order