Skip to main content

pre-flight

Pre-production code review against a user-chosen healthy point. Use whenever a user wants to review a branch before shipping, asks if code is ready to merge, wants blockers identified before a PR lands.

Quellinformationen

Repository
codiume/skills
Letzte Quellaktivität
23. August 2026 um 14:34
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
6
Forks
1

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
pre-flight
description
Pre-production code review against a user-chosen healthy point. Use whenever a user wants to review a branch before shipping, asks if code is ready to merge, wants blockers identified before a PR lands.
disable-model-invocation
true
# Pre-production code review Look for reasons this branch should not ship. Verify each finding before giving a verdict. ## Phase 1: Pin the healthy point The user gives you the healthy point: a commit `SHA`, `branch`, `tag`, `main`, `HEAD~5`, anything naming a moment when the app worked (production). If they didn't specify one, use `main`. Before going further: 1. Confirm it resolves: `git rev-parse <healthy-point>`. 2. Write the diff command once and reuse it everywhere: `git diff <healthy-point>...HEAD`. Three dots, so git compares against the merge-base. 3. Confirm the diff is non-empty. A bad ref or empty diff should fail here, not mid-review. ## Phase 2: Read the diff and its context 1. Run the captured diff command for the full changeset. 2. For every changed file, read enough surrounding code to understand the original contract and what changed. 3. Check related code for auth, data models, API contracts, config, migrations, shared utilities, error handling, and logging. 4. If something is unclear, inspect the codebase before asking a question. Ask only when the code cannot answer it. ## Phase 3: Classify the risks Give every change one label: | Label | Meaning | | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ | | 🔴 Breaking | Changes observable behavior or an API contract | | 🟡 Incomplete | Covers only the happy path, or leaves TODOs or dead branches | | 🟠 Conflict | Contradicts the system spec or project conventions | | 🟢 Safe | Has no side effects outside its module | ## Phase 4: Adversarial Interview Work through every implicit decision, unclear behavior, and non-obvious tradeoff in the diff. - One question at a time; wait for a response before continuing. - Include your recommended answer with each question. - Resolve dependencies in order. - Check the codebase before asking. Only raise questions the code cannot answer. - Stop when no implicit assumptions remain. ## Phase 5: Decide whether it ships (Go / No-Go) _Only after all Phase 4 questions are resolved._ - ✅ **SHIP**. Every risk is safe 🟢, or every finding has a confirmed fix in this branch. - ❌ **DO NOT SHIP**. List every blocking action. Include the file path, line number, and relevant snippet for each item.
Auf GitHub ansehen