Skip to main content

mobility-capability-study

Work on the Ocean Park mobility-capability-study repository: analysis, research data, proposal/paper consistency, and workspace maintenance. Use for tasks in this project or explicitly about its methodology; not unrelated Hanoi transport research.

Quellinformationen

Repository
Cuki2910/mobility_capability_study
Letzte Quellaktivität
10. Oktober 2026 um 05:03
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
2
Forks
0

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
5 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
mobility-capability-study
description
Work on the Ocean Park mobility-capability-study repository: analysis, research data, proposal/paper consistency, and workspace maintenance. Use for tasks in this project or explicitly about its methodology; not unrelated Hanoi transport research.
# Mobility Capability Study The user's latest direction supersedes historical designs. Prepare the requested draft, update affected implementation/tests/guidance, and present the batch report before asking for confirmation. Never revert an authorized new idea to satisfy an old method assertion. Until the user replies, label the batch `PENDING_USER_CONFIRMATION`; do not claim research adoption or publish/merge it. ## Sources and scope - Follow the repository's `AGENTS.md`. Read `CLAUDE.md`, `docs/data_sources.md`, `docs/decisions.md`, and `proposal/proposal_v7.md` in that order before changes; reuse context already read this session unless it changed. - Formulas live in `src/accessibility.py`; Scenario A/B normalization and primary RAC selection live in `src/pilot.py`; analytical defaults live in `config/pipeline.json`. If prose conflicts, inspect these sources and the latest applicable decision; identify the stale guidance before correcting it. Preserve dated history. - `proposal/proposal_v7.md` is the only retained proposal. Methods are in Sections 7-10; Section 3 contains research questions. - Derive current status from repository artifacts and actual local files. A recorded download does not prove the dataset exists in this checkout. Do not hard-code a current blocker or headline number in this skill. - Keep the requested scope. Workspace cleanup does not require data acquisition or pipeline regeneration. Ocean Park is the current study; extend it when the user requests that change. ## Choose the relevant workflow - **Formulas, validation, or analysis:** read [methodology guidance](references/methodology-cheatsheet.md). - **Proposal, paper, or literature review:** read the same guidance, including its citation checks; match code, config, and decisions rather than dated prose. - **Data acquisition, VinBus, or OSM:** read [data workflow](references/osm-vinbus-workflow.md). - **Workspace maintenance:** preserve user changes, data, canonical outputs, and referenced paths. Follow explicit retention/deletion choices; update affected guidance. - **Explanation or status review:** inspect the relevant files and report evidence. A read-only request does not require downloads, regeneration, or gates. ## Verification and handoff - Use the project's Python environment and paths appropriate to the current OS. Inspect acquisition scripts for top-level side effects before invoking `--help` or importing them; `scripts/scrape_vinbus.py` performs acquisition at top level. Do not assume legacy Windows commands work on macOS. - Formula changes require proposal index-construction/validation updates and meaningful tests in the same change. Keep reusable logic in `src/` and command wrappers in `scripts/`. - After changes, run `python scripts/agent_gate.py`; full tests apply to formula, validation, network, or calibration changes under `AGENTS.md`. Documentation-only work needs no extra full test run beyond checks selected by the gate. Follow `docs/agent_workflow.md` and `config/agent_policy.json` for change review and coordination. - Gate self-audits write under `.agent/`, preserving published outputs. Read `.agent/change_review.md`, add the purpose, impact and limitations in the user-facing report, then ask for confirmation after each batch. Method/status transitions and missing coupled edits are review notes, not orders to restore the baseline. Genuine calculation, schema, or data errors still require correction. A gate PASS does not certify review, freshness, or user approval. - Report files changed, checks that passed or could not run, and remaining data blockers. Verify live external claims when needed; report local availability separately from historical acquisition status.
Auf GitHub ansehen