Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Transform your outdoor space into a beautiful, functional landscape with expert plant knowledge and design principles.
DECISION POINTS
Primary Design Process Decision Tree
CLIENT REQUEST → First Assessment
├── Has photos + measurements + specific needs?
│ ├── YES → Proceed to analysis phase
│ └── NO → STOP. Get documentation first (see Quality Gates)
│
├── ANALYSIS PHASE: What's the primary constraint?
│ ├── PRIVACY (most common)
│ │ ├── Need screening within 2 years?
│ │ │ ├── YES → Fast-growth options + fence hybrid
│ │ │ └── NO → Quality long-term species
│ │ └── Deer pressure high?
│ │ ├── YES → Avoid arborvitae, use resistant species
│ │ └── NO → Full plant palette available
│ │
│ ├── SHADE/SUN Issues
│ │ ├── Less than 3 hours sun?
│ │ │ ├── YES → Shade-tolerant palette only
│ │ │ └── NO → Assess partial vs full sun zones
│ │ └── More than 8 hours intense sun?
│ │ ├── YES → Drought-tolerant, heat-resistant
│ │ └── NO → Standard sun/part-shade options
│ │
│ └── BUDGET Constraints
│ ├── Under $2000 total?
│ │ ├── YES → Phased approach, start with structure
│ │ └── NO → Can do comprehensive design
│ └── DIY vs Professional install?
│ ├── DIY → Simplify design, standard plants
│ └── PRO → More complex features possible
Soil/Drainage Decision Tree
DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT (critical but often skipped)
├── Does water pool after rain?
│ ├── YES → Poor drainage confirmed
│ │ ├── Clay soil + pooling → Install bioswale or French drain
│ │ ├── Just clay → Amend beds with compost + sand
│ │ └── Compacted → Core aeration + organic matter
│ │
│ └── NO → Test infiltration rate
│ ├── Dig 12" hole, fill with water, time drainage
│ ├── Drains in <2 hours → Good drainage, standard plants
│ ├── 2-6 hours → Moderate, some wet-soil adaptations
│ └── >6 hours → Poor drainage, see above solutions
│
├── PLANT SELECTION SHIFTS based on drainage:
│ ├── Poor drainage → River birch, bald cypress, inkberry holly
│ ├── Good drainage → Standard palette
│ └── Excellent drainage → Drought-tolerant, Mediterranean plants
Privacy Timeline Decision Matrix
URGENCY vs QUALITY Trade-off
├── IMMEDIATE (fence + plants)
│ ├── 6' fence now, plants to soften/replace over time
│ ├── Cost: $25-50/linear foot fencing + $200-400 plants
│ └── Result: Privacy now, beauty in 3-5 years
│
├── FAST (2-3 years acceptable)
│ ├── 6-8' specimens of proven species
│ ├── Cost: $150-300 per plant, closer spacing
│ └── Result: Screening in 2-3 years, mature in 5-7
│
└── PATIENT (5+ years acceptable)
├── 3-5' healthy nursery stock, proper spacing
├── Cost: $50-100 per plant, wider spacing
└── Result: Better long-term health, lower cost
FAILURE MODES
"Arborvitae Tunnel Vision" Anti-Pattern
DETECTION RULE: Client says "I want arborvitae for privacy" as first plant mentioned
SYMPTOMS: Fixated on single species, ignores site conditions, dismisses alternatives
DIAGNOSIS: Falling for nursery marketing without understanding trade-offs
FIX:
Show arborvitae failure photos (deer damage, bagworm, snow break)
Present 3 alternatives with pros/cons comparison
If they insist: specify deer protection and maintenance requirements
"Mature Size Blindness" Anti-Pattern
DETECTION RULE: Spacing plants based on nursery size, not mature spread
SYMPTOMS: Plants too close to house/fence/each other, "room for one more" thinking
DIAGNOSIS: Not visualizing 10-20 year growth
FIX:
Draw mature footprints on site plan
Show before/after photos of overcrowded plantings
Calculate cost of future removal/replacement
"Foundation Suffocation" Anti-Pattern
DETECTION RULE: Any plant within 3 feet of house foundation
SYMPTOMS: Shrubs touching walls, blocking windows, pest entry points
DIAGNOSIS: Traditional "foundation planting" mentality without modern understanding
FIX:
Move plantings to mature width + 2 feet from structure
Use low shrubs under windows, taller plants at corners
Show moisture/pest damage examples
"Big Box Bargain Hunter" Anti-Pattern
DETECTION RULE: Planning around clearance/sale plants without species research
SYMPTOMS: "I got 20 arborvitae for $300!" without knowing mature needs
DIAGNOSIS: Price-first instead of site-appropriate selection
FIX:
Calculate replacement costs in 5-10 years
Show photos of failed cheap plantings
Redirect to local nursery with site-appropriate alternatives
"Maintenance Amnesia" Anti-Pattern
DETECTION RULE: Client wants "low maintenance" but selects high-maintenance plants
SYMPTOMS: Roses + boxwood + pristine lawn + perfect edges desired with "no work"
DIAGNOSIS: Instagram expectations without reality check
FIX:
Define actual maintenance hours available per week
Show maintenance-appropriate plant palettes
Phase in higher-maintenance areas over time
WORKED EXAMPLES
Example 1: Suburban Deer Problem Privacy Screen
SCENARIO: Colonial home, 40' back fence needs screening, heavy deer pressure, $3000 budget, 5-year timeline acceptable
DECISION PROCESS:
Initial Assessment: Photos show deer trails, damaged hostas, neighbors' arborvitae eaten to sticks
Drainage Test: Good drainage, full sun location
Species Selection: AVOID arborvitae (deer candy), consider alternatives
Final Choice: Mix of Nellie Stevens Holly (deer resistant) + native Eastern Red Cedar
Phasing: Install fall Year 1, assess gaps Year 3, infill if needed
NOVICE WOULD MISS: Would pick arborvitae based on "fast growing" label, ignore deer evidence
EXPERT CATCHES: Deer scat near fence = avoid deer-favorite plants, mix species for resilience
OUTCOME: Initial slower growth but no deer damage, full screening by Year 5, 20+ year lifespan
Layout: Asymmetric groupings, clear sight lines to patio
NOVICE WOULD MISS: Would try sun plants in shade, create busy mixed borders
EXPERT CATCHES: Embrace shade as design opportunity, use foliage contrast instead of flowers
