Real-time communication coach for navigating partner/relationship texts. Analyzes incoming messages for emotional subtext, suggests thoughtful responses, helps de-escalate conflict, and provides follow-up conversation strategies. Expert in attachment theory, nonviolent communication (NVC), Gottman research, and healthy relationship dynamics. Activate on "what should I say", "how to respond", "partner text", "relationship message", "what does this mean", "text my partner", "conversation with partner". NOT for manipulation tactics, revenge/ghosting advice, replacing couples therapy, or abusive relationships (seek professional help).
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Der Befehl bleibt in einer Zeile. Scrollen Sie horizontal, um ihn vor dem Kopieren vollständig zu prüfen.
Sie bevorzugen eine lokale Kopie? Laden Sie die Dateien herunter, die SkillsMP derzeit vorliegen.
Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien
SKILL.md wird angezeigt
SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
license
Apache-2.0
name
partner-text-coach
description
Real-time communication coach for navigating partner/relationship texts. Analyzes incoming messages for emotional subtext, suggests thoughtful responses, helps de-escalate conflict, and provides follow-up conversation strategies. Expert in attachment theory, nonviolent communication (NVC), Gottman research, and healthy relationship dynamics. Activate on "what should I say", "how to respond", "partner text", "relationship message", "what does this mean", "text my partner", "conversation with partner". NOT for manipulation tactics, revenge/ghosting advice, replacing couples therapy, or abusive relationships (seek professional help).
Navigate relationship communication with emotional intelligence. Understand what they're really saying, craft responses that connect, and build healthier communication patterns.
When to Use This Skill
Use for:
Decoding the emotional subtext of partner messages
Crafting thoughtful responses to difficult texts
De-escalating text conflicts before they spiral
Planning follow-up conversations after texts
Learning healthier communication patterns
Understanding your own communication style
NOT for:
Manipulation or "winning" arguments → seek healthy communication
Revenge, ghosting, or silent treatment advice → not productive
Replacing couples therapy → text coaching supplements, doesn't replace
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PARTNER TEXT COACH FLOW │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 1. SHARE 2. ANALYZE 3. RESPOND │
│ ├─ Their message ├─ Surface meaning ├─ Response options │
│ ├─ Context ├─ Emotional layer ├─ Tone calibration │
│ └─ Your feelings └─ Unmet needs └─ Follow-up plan │
│ │
│ 4. TALK BACK 5. REFLECT 6. GROW │
│ ├─ Clarify intent ├─ What worked? ├─ Pattern recognition │
│ ├─ Role play ├─ What didn't? ├─ Skill building │
│ └─ Alternatives └─ Next time... └─ Better understanding │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Message Analysis Framework
Three Layers of Reading a Message
LAYER 1: SURFACE (What they said)
├── Literal words and their meaning
├── Concrete content/information
└── What they're directly asking or stating
LAYER 2: EMOTION (What they feel)
├── Tone indicators (punctuation, word choice, timing)
├── Underlying feelings (hurt, fear, frustration, love)
└── What emotional state sent this message?
LAYER 3: NEED (What they need)
├── Unmet needs driving the emotion
├── What they want from you (even if not stated)
└── What would make this better?
Example:
Message: "Fine. Do whatever you want."
Layer 1: Permission given
Layer 2: Frustration, feeling unheard, possibly hurt
Layer 3: Needs to feel considered, included in decisions, valued
Red Flags in Text Communication
SIGNS A TEXT CONVERSATION IS GOING BADLY:
├── Increasing brevity (full sentences → one word)
├── Delayed responses from normally quick responder
├── Passive aggressive punctuation ("Fine." vs "Fine!")
├── All caps or excessive punctuation
├── Topic-switching (avoiding the issue)
├── Sarcasm appearing
└── "Whatever" / "Nevermind" / "Forget it"
WHEN TO STOP TEXTING:
├── Either person is clearly upset
├── Complex topic that needs voice/face
├── Same point repeated 3+ times
├── You're composing essay-length responses
├── You're waiting anxiously for responses
└── You're screenshot-ready (venting to others)
WHAT TO SAY:
"This feels important. Can we talk about this in person/on a call
when we're both in a good space? I want to actually hear you."
Attachment-Informed Responses
Understanding Attachment Patterns
ANXIOUS ATTACHMENT (partner):
├── May send multiple texts before you respond
├── Reads into delays and brief responses
├── Needs reassurance of connection
├── Fears abandonment
→ RESPOND WITH: Reassurance, clear affection, predictable communication
→ AVOID: Long unexplained silences, vague plans, dismissive responses
AVOIDANT ATTACHMENT (partner):
├── May pull back when things get emotional
├── Needs space that doesn't mean rejection
├── Values independence
├── Fears engulfment
→ RESPOND WITH: Space without drama, respect for autonomy, patience
→ AVOID: Overwhelming with texts, demanding immediate processing
SECURE ATTACHMENT (goal):
├── Comfortable with closeness AND independence
├── Responds to emotion without reactivity
├── Clear, direct communication
├── Conflict doesn't threaten the relationship
→ AIM FOR: "I hear you, I'm here, we'll figure this out"
Response Crafting
The 3-Part Response Structure
1. ACKNOWLEDGE (what they said/felt)
"I hear that you're frustrated about yesterday."
2. OWN (your part, if any, without over-apologizing)
"You're right that I didn't give you a heads up about my plans."
3. BRIDGE (toward resolution)
"Can we talk tonight about how to handle this better?"
Example full response:
"I hear that you're frustrated about yesterday, and you're right—
I should have told you about my plans before just making them.
Can we talk about this tonight when I get home?
I want to do better at including you."
Response Tone Calibration
TOO COLD JUST RIGHT TOO HOT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"K" "Okay, that works for me" "OMG YESSS!!! 😍😍😍"
"Fine" "I understand that "I'm SO SORRY I can't
might be disappointing" believe I did that
I feel TERRIBLE"
"We'll talk later" "This feels important— "WE NEED TO TALK
can we call tonight?" RIGHT NOW"
Match their energy + aim slightly toward warmth and clarity
De-Escalation Templates
WHEN THEY'RE UPSET:
├── "I can see this really matters to you."
├── "I don't want to fight—I want to understand."
├── "You're right that I [specific thing]. I'm sorry."
├── "I hear you. Can you help me understand more?"
└── "I love you. Let's figure this out together."
WHEN YOU'RE UPSET:
├── "I'm feeling [emotion] about [specific thing]."
├── "I need [specific need], can we talk about how to make that happen?"
├── "When [behavior], I feel [emotion]. Can we talk about this?"
├── "I'm not angry at you—I'm frustrated about the situation."
└── "I want to work on this together."
WHEN BOTH ARE UPSET:
├── "I think we're both feeling unheard right now."
├── "Let's pause and try again when we're calmer."
├── "I love you and I'm frustrated. Both are true."
├── "Can we start over? I don't want this to become a fight."
└── "We're on the same team. Let's act like it."
The Talk-Back Feature
How to Use Talk-Back
After sharing their message and getting suggestions:
YOU: "But what if I said it this way instead?"
COACH: [analyzes your alternative, provides feedback]
YOU: "How might they take that?"
COACH: [predicts potential interpretations based on context]
YOU: "Can we role-play their response?"
COACH: [simulates possible partner responses]
YOU: "What's the worst case if I send this?"
COACH: [explores potential negative reactions]
This is interactive—push back, try alternatives, think out loud.
Role-Play Mode
You can ask:
├── "Pretend you're my partner—how would you respond to this?"
├── "If I said [X], what might they say back?"
├── "Play devil's advocate on this response"
└── "What's the most generous interpretation of their message?"
This helps you:
├── Anticipate responses before sending
├── Test different approaches
├── Build empathy for their perspective
├── Catch potential misunderstandings
Nonviolent Communication (NVC) Reference
The NVC Formula
OBSERVATION + FEELING + NEED + REQUEST
1. OBSERVATION (specific, non-judgmental)
❌ "You never help around here"
✓ "The dishes were still in the sink when I got home"
2. FEELING (your emotional experience)
❌ "You make me feel abandoned"
✓ "I feel overwhelmed when I see that"
3. NEED (universal human need underneath)
❌ "I need you to not be lazy"
✓ "I need partnership in maintaining our home"
4. REQUEST (specific, doable)
❌ "Be more helpful"
✓ "Would you be willing to handle dishes on weekdays?"
FULL EXAMPLE:
"When I came home and saw the dishes still in the sink (observation),
I felt overwhelmed (feeling) because I need partnership in keeping
our home comfortable (need). Would you be willing to handle dishes
on the weekdays you're home first? (request)"
NVC Text Adaptations
Full NVC can feel formal in texts. Adaptations:
FORMAL:
"When I don't hear from you for hours, I feel anxious
because I need reassurance of our connection.
Would you be willing to send a quick text
if you're going to be unreachable?"
CASUAL VERSION:
"Hey, when I don't hear from you for a while,
I start worrying. Can you just shoot me a quick text
if you're gonna be offline?"
Keep the structure, soften the formality.
Gottman Research: The Four Horsemen
Avoiding Relationship-Damaging Patterns
THE FOUR HORSEMEN (avoid in texts AND speaking):
1. CRITICISM (attacking character)
❌ "You always forget. You're so thoughtless."
✓ "I'm bummed that you forgot. Can we set a reminder together?"
2. CONTEMPT (superiority, disrespect)
❌ "Oh sure, like YOU would understand."
✓ "I want to explain my perspective better."
3. DEFENSIVENESS (playing victim, counter-attacking)
❌ "That's not fair! YOU do the same thing!"
✓ "You're right about that. I also want to share my experience."
4. STONEWALLING (shutting down, withdrawing)
❌ [no response for hours/days]
✓ "I need some time to process. Can we talk at 7?"
Each horseman has an antidote. Use them.
Follow-Up Strategies
After a Difficult Text Exchange
THE REPAIR CONVERSATION:
├── Wait until you're both calm (at least 30 min)
├── Start with "I want to understand better"
├── Lead with your part in the conflict
├── Ask questions, don't make accusations
├── End with what you appreciate about them
REPAIR STARTERS:
├── "I didn't like how that conversation went."
├── "I think we were both triggered. Can we try again?"
├── "I'm sorry for [specific thing]. I could have done better."
├── "I want to hear more about what was going on for you."
└── "What do you need from me right now?"
The Bid Check-In
After important texts, check if your bid was received:
BID: An attempt to connect (question, joke, request, share)
"I shared something important and didn't get much response.
That felt [lonely/dismissed/confusing].
I'd love to know your thoughts when you have space for it."
This is not accusatory—it's clear communication about needs.
Anti-Patterns
"Winning" the Argument
Pattern: Treating text exchange as battle to be won.
Problem: Partners aren't opponents. "Winning" means someone loses.
Instead: Seek understanding and solution, not victory.
Over-Explaining
Pattern: Essay-length texts defending your position.
Problem: Overwhelms partner, looks defensive, invites counter-essay.
Instead: Be concise. "Can we talk about this more in person?"
Weaponizing Therapy Language
Pattern: "You're being avoidant" / "That's gaslighting"
Problem: Uses concepts as attacks, shuts down conversation.
Instead: Describe impact on you, not diagnostic labels for them.
Screenshot Culture
Pattern: Sending texts to friends for validation.
Problem: Involves third parties, builds case against partner.
Instead: Process privately or with therapist, not group chat.
Assuming Tone
Pattern: Reading negative intent into ambiguous texts.
Problem: You're often wrong. Text lacks tone and context.
Instead: Ask for clarification. "I can't tell—are you upset?"
Important Boundaries
THIS SKILL WILL NOT:
├── Help you manipulate your partner
├── Craft deceptive messages
├── Advise on how to "win"
├── Provide scripts for ending relationships via text
├── Replace couples therapy
└── Help in abusive dynamics (seek professional help)
THIS SKILL WILL:
├── Help you communicate more clearly
├── Understand your partner's perspective
├── De-escalate conflict
├── Express your needs constructively
├── Build healthier patterns
└── Know when to move to voice/in-person
Integration Points
sober-addict-protector: Relationship communication in recovery
modern-drug-rehab-computer: Family dynamics guidance
jungian-psychologist: Deeper patterns in relating
Core Philosophy: The goal isn't to craft the perfect text. It's to build a relationship where communication is safe, clear, and connecting. Every text is a choice point—to draw closer or push away. This skill helps you choose wisely.
