Skip to main content

verification-plan-codex

Use when a plan needs proof criteria before execution, especially coding changes, business deliverables, mixed business-coding projects, acceptance criteria, rollback triggers, manual checks, or final validation design.

Quellinformationen

Repository
dachent/skills
Letzte Quellaktivität
19. Juli 2026 um 14:18
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
35
Forks
2

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
6 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
verification-plan-codex
description
Use when a plan needs proof criteria before execution, especially coding changes, business deliverables, mixed business-coding projects, acceptance criteria, rollback triggers, manual checks, or final validation design.
# Codex Verification Plan ## Overview Define how the work will be proven correct before execution starts. A verification plan maps each success criterion to commands, checks, expected results, evidence, and recovery triggers. ## Workflow 1. Read success criteria, failure criteria, out-of-scope boundaries, repo map, evidence catalog, assumption ledger, and the current implementation plan. 2. Classify validation as software, business, or mixed. 3. For every success criterion, define at least one proof method. 4. For every failure criterion, define the signal that would show it happened. 5. Define rollback or recovery triggers before execution. 6. Return the verification plan in conversation. Write an artifact only when the user explicitly requests one, and place it in the active session folder or another user-approved destination. ## Native Plan Mode - Use the current plan, success criteria, failure criteria, and inspected evidence directly; do not require a repository planning workfolder. - Use this table shape when a table improves clarity: `Criterion`, `Proof method`, `Command/check`, `Expected result`, `Evidence artifact`, `Owner/Reviewer`, `Failure signal`, and `Recovery trigger`. - Map every success criterion to at least one proof method and every failure criterion to a failure signal. - If a human decision is still required, identify the exact unresolved decision without adding a duplicate execution-approval gate. - Do not write files while the current collaboration mode prohibits mutations. ## References Read as needed: - `references/software-validation.md` for tests, builds, static checks, smoke checks, and command output. - `references/business-validation.md` for stakeholder acceptance, source reconciliation, document checks, and calculation checks. - `references/rollback-and-recovery.md` for Git and no-Git recovery strategies. ## Minimum Output Include: - criterion identifier; - proof method; - command or manual check; - expected result; - evidence artifact; - owner or reviewer if human review is required; - failure signal; - rollback or recovery trigger. ## Red Flags Do not accept vague checks such as "test it manually", "review output", "run the app", or "stakeholder approves" without defining the specific evidence that makes the check pass.
Auf GitHub ansehen