Choose a prioritization framework based on stage, team context, and stakeholder needs. Use when deciding between RICE, ICE, value/effort, or another scoring approach.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Choose a prioritization framework based on stage, team context, and stakeholder needs. Use when deciding between RICE, ICE, value/effort, or another scoring approach.
intent
Guide product managers in choosing the right prioritization framework by asking adaptive questions about product stage, team context, decision-making needs, and stakeholder dynamics. Use this to avoid "framework whiplash" (switching frameworks constantly) or applying the wrong framework (e.g., using RICE for strategic bets or ICE for data-driven decisions). Outputs a recommended framework with implementation guidance tailored to your context.
type
interactive
best_for
["Choosing the right prioritization framework for a team or stage","Deciding between RICE, ICE, value/effort, and similar models","Reducing debate about how to prioritize competing work"]
scenarios
["Which prioritization framework should my startup use right now?","Help me choose between RICE and value/effort for roadmap planning","We keep arguing about prioritization. Recommend a framework."]
theme
strategy-positioning
estimated_time
15-25 min
Purpose
Guide product managers in choosing the right prioritization framework by asking adaptive questions about product stage, team context, decision-making needs, and stakeholder dynamics. Use this to avoid "framework whiplash" (switching frameworks constantly) or applying the wrong framework (e.g., using RICE for strategic bets or ICE for data-driven decisions). Outputs a recommended framework with implementation guidance tailored to your context.
This is not a scoring calculator—it's a decision guide that matches prioritization frameworks to your specific situation.
Input
Works best with: What you're trying to prioritize and why now (sprint planning, roadmap, stakeholder fight).
Also useful: Product stage, team size, data availability, and frameworks you've tried that failed.
Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or an appended ARGUMENTS: line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it covers; don't re-ask.
Arriving empty-handed? That works too. The advisor opens by asking about your product stage and the decision you need the framework to make.
Example invocation:Help me pick a framework: seed-stage B2B startup, 40-item backlog, zero usage data, loud enterprise prospect.
After collecting responses, the agent recommends a framework:
# Prioritization Framework Recommendation**Based on your context:**-**Product Stage:** [From Q1]
-**Team Context:** [From Q2]
-**Decision-Making Need:** [From Q3]
-**Data Availability:** [From Q4]
---
## Recommended Framework: [Framework Name]**Why this framework fits:**- [Rationale 1 based on Q1-Q4]
- [Rationale 2]
- [Rationale 3]
**When to use it:**- [Context where this framework excels]
**When NOT to use it:**- [Limitations or contexts where it fails]
---
## How to Implement### Step 1: [First implementation step]- [Detailed guidance]
- [Example: "Define scoring criteria: Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort"]
### Step 2: [Second step]- [Detailed guidance]
- [Example: "Score each feature on 1-10 scale"]
### Step 3: [Third step]- [Detailed guidance]
- [Example: "Calculate RICE score: (Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort"]
### Step 4: [Fourth step]- [Detailed guidance]
- [Example: "Rank by score; review top 10 with stakeholders"]
---
## Example Scoring Template
[Provide a concrete example of how to use the framework]
**Example (if RICE):**
| Feature | Reach (users/month) | Impact (1-3) | Confidence (%) | Effort (person-months) | RICE Score |
|---------|---------------------|--------------|----------------|------------------------|------------|
| Feature A | 10,000 | 3 (massive) | 80% | 2 | 12,000 |
| Feature B | 5,000 | 2 (high) | 70% | 1 | 7,000 |
| Feature C | 2,000 | 1 (medium) | 50% | 0.5 | 2,000 |
**Priority:** Feature A > Feature B > Feature C
---
## Alternative Framework (Second Choice)**If the recommended framework doesn't fit, consider:** [Alternative framework name]
**Why this might work:**- [Rationale]
**Tradeoffs:**- [What you gain vs. what you lose]
---
## Common Pitfalls with This Framework1.**[Pitfall 1]** — [Description and how to avoid]
2.**[Pitfall 2]** — [Description and how to avoid]
3.**[Pitfall 3]** — [Description and how to avoid]
---
## Reassess When- Product stage changes (e.g., PMF → scaling)
- Team grows or reorganizes
- Stakeholder dynamics shift
- Current framework feels broken (e.g., too slow, ignoring important factors)
---
**Would you like implementation templates or examples for this framework?**
Examples
Example 1: Good Framework Match (Early PMF, RICE)
Q1 Response: "Early PMF, scaling — Found initial PMF; growing fast; adding features to retain/expand"
