GitHub Issue Creator workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Turn error logs, screenshots, voice notes, and rough bug reports into crisp, developer-ready GitHub issues with repro steps, impact, and evidence and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
GitHub Issue Creator workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Turn error logs, screenshots, voice notes, and rough bug reports into crisp, developer-ready GitHub issues with repro steps, impact, and evidence and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
This public intake copy packages plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/github-issue-creator from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses the external_source block in metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Output Template, Environment, Actual Behavior, Error Details, Visual Evidence, Impact.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
[What should happen] Agent appears in list with deployment status, errors shown if deployment fails Agent publishes successfully to Teams channel Use this skill when you have unstructured bug input such as pasted errors, support notes, screenshots, or voice dictation and need to turn it into a clean GitHub issue with a summary, reproduction steps, expected vs actual behavior, impact, and attachment references.
Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Turn error logs, screenshots, voice notes, and rough bug reports into crisp, developer-ready GitHub issues with repro steps, impact, and evidence.
Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
Use when copied upstream references, examples, or scripts materially improve the answer.
Use when the workflow should remain reviewable in the public intake repo before the private enhancer takes over.
Operating Table
Situation
Start here
Why it matters
First-time use
metadata.json
Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path through the external_source block before touching the copied workflow
Provenance review
ORIGIN.md
Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source
Workflow execution
SKILL.md
Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution
Supporting context
SKILL.md
Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package
Handoff decision
## Related Skills
Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
[Step]
Navigate to agent deployment
Configure and deploy agent
Observe workflow completes
Check agent list
Configure agent for Teams channel
Attempt to publish
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: Reproduction Steps
[Step]
[Step]
[Step]
Imported: Reproduction Steps
Navigate to agent deployment
Configure and deploy agent
Observe workflow completes
Check agent list
Imported: Reproduction Steps
Configure agent for Teams channel
Attempt to publish
Imported: Summary
[One-line description of the issue]
Imported: Summary
Agent deployment fails silently - no error displayed, agent disappears from list
Imported: Summary
403 PERMISSION_DENIED error when publishing to Teams channel
Imported: Output Template
## Examples### Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly```text
Use @github-issue-creator to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @github-issue-creator against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @github-issue-creator for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @github-issue-creator using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Imported Usage Notes
Imported: Examples
Input (voice dictation):
so I was trying to deploy the agent and it just failed silently no error nothing the workflow ran but then poof gone from the list had to refresh and try again three times
Output:
## Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
- Critical: Service down, data loss, security issue
- High: Major feature broken, no workaround
- Medium: Feature impaired, workaround exists
- Low: Minor inconvenience, cosmetic
- Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
- Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
- Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
### Imported Operating Notes#### Imported: Guidelines**Be crisp**: No fluff. Every word should add value.
**Extract structure from chaos**: Voice dictation and raw notes often contain the facts buried in casual language. Pull them out.
**Infer missing context**: If user mentions "same project" or "the dashboard", use context from conversation or memory to fill in specifics.
**Placeholder sensitive data**: Use `[PROJECT_NAME]`, `[USER_ID]`, etc. for anything that might be sensitive.
**Match severity to impact**:
- Critical: Service down, data loss, security issue
- High: Major feature broken, no workaround
- Medium: Feature impaired, workaround exists
- Low: Minor inconvenience, cosmetic
**Image/GIF handling**: Reference attachments inline. Format: `!Description`## Troubleshooting### Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically**Symptoms:** The result ignores the upstream workflow in `plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/github-issue-creator`, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
**Solution:** Re-open `metadata.json`, `ORIGIN.md`, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Check the `external_source` block first, then restate the provenance before continuing.
### Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review**Symptoms:** Reviewers can see the generated `SKILL.md`, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
**Solution:** Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
### Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization**Symptoms:** The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better.
**Solution:** Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
## Related Skills-`@00-andruia-consultant` - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
-`@00-andruia-consultant-v2` - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
-`@10-andruia-skill-smith` - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
-`@10-andruia-skill-smith-v2` - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
## Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
| Resource family | What it gives the reviewer | Example path |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `references` | copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream | `references/n/a` |
| `examples` | worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream | `examples/n/a` |
| `scripts` | upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation | `scripts/n/a` |
| `agents` | routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package | `agents/n/a` |
| `assets` | supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package | `assets/n/a` |
### Imported Reference Notes#### Imported: Environment-**Product/Service**:
-**Region/Version**:
-**Browser/OS**: (if relevant)
#### Imported: Actual Behavior
[What actually happens]
#### Imported: Error Details
Create issues as markdown files in /issues/ directory at the repo root. Use naming convention: YYYY-MM-DD-short-description.md
Imported: Environment
Product/Service: Azure AI Foundry
Region/Version: westus2
Imported: Actual Behavior
Agent disappears from list. No error message. Requires page refresh and retry.
Imported: Impact
High - Blocks agent deployment workflow, no feedback on failure cause
Imported: Additional Context
Required 3 retry attempts before successful deployment
---
**Input (error paste)**:
> Error: PERMISSION_DENIED when publishing to Teams channel. Code: 403. Was working yesterday.
**Output**:
```markdown
#### Imported: Environment
- **Product/Service**: Copilot Studio → Teams integration
- **Region/Version**: [REGION]
#### Imported: Actual Behavior
Returns `PERMISSION_DENIED` with code 403
#### Imported: Error Details
Error: PERMISSION_DENIED
Code: 403
#### Imported: Impact
**High** - Blocks Teams integration, regression from previous working state
#### Imported: Additional Context
Was working yesterday - possible permission/config change or service regression
Imported: Limitations
Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
